In mathematical analysis, a sequence { fn } of functions converges uniformly to a limiting function f if the speed of convergence of fn(x) to f(x) does not depend on x. This notion is used because several important properties of the functions fn, such as continuity, differentiability and Riemann integrability, are only transferred to the limit f if the convergence is uniform.
Suppose S is a set and fn : S → R are real-valued functions for every natural number n. We say that the sequence (fn) converges uniformly with limit f : S → R if
The sequence (fn) is said to converge locally uniformly with limit f if for every x in S, if there exists an r > 0 such that (fn) converges uniformly on B(x,r) ∩ S.
Compare uniform convergence to the concept of pointwise convergence: The sequence (fn) converges pointwise with limit f : S → R if and only if
In the case of uniform convergence, N can only depend on ε, while in the case of pointwise convergence N may depend on ε and x. It is therefore plain that uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. The converse is not true, as the following example shows: take S to be the unit interval * and define fn(x) = xn for every natural number n. Then (fn) converges pointwise to the function f defined by f(x) = 0 if x < 1 and f(1) = 1. This convergence is not uniform: for instance for ε = 1/4, there exists no N as required by the definition.
Given a topological space X, we can equip the space of bounded real or complex-valued functions over X with the uniform norm topology. Then, uniform convergence simply means convergence in the uniform norm topology.
If S is a real interval (or indeed any topological space), we can talk about the continuity of the functions fn and f. The following is the more important result about uniform continuity:
If S is an interval and all the functions fn are differentiable and converge to a limit f, it is often desirable to differentiate the limit function f by taking the limit of the derivatives of fn. This is however in general not possible: even if the convergence is uniform, the limit function need not be differentiable, and even if it is differentiable, the derivative of the limit function need not be equal to the limit of the derivatives. Consider for instance fn(x) = 1/n sin(nx) with uniform limit 0, but the derivatives do not approach 0. The precise statement covering this situation is as follows:
One may straightforwardly extend the concept to functions S → M, where (M, d) is a metric space, by replacing |fn(x) - f(x)| with d(fn(x), f(x)).
The most general setting is the uniform convergence of nets of functions S → X, where X is a uniform space. We say that the net (fα) converges uniformly with limit f : S → X iff
Augustin Louis Cauchy in 1821 published a faulty proof of the false statement that the pointwise limit of a sequence of continuous functions is always continuous. Joseph Fourier and Niels Henrik Abel found counter examples in the context of Fourier series. Dirichlet then analyzed Cauchy's proof and found the mistake: the notion of pointwise convergence had to be replaced by uniform convergence.
Theory and Application of Infinite Series, Konrad Knopp, Blackie and Son, London, 1954, reprinted by Dover Publications, ISBN 0486661652.
Calculus | Mathematical series
Gleichmäßige Konvergenz | Convergence uniforme | התכנסות במידה שווה | Tasainen suppeneminen
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Uniform convergence".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world