Spiritual science refers to the application of scientific methodology to experiences or phenomena of mind, culture or spirit. Interest in such an application arose widely at the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth century. Edmund Husserl, for example, wrote in 1935:
The term spiritual science is a translation from the German "Geisteswissenschaft" (pl. "Geisteswissenschaften"), which arose as a translation of John Stuart Mills' reference to "moral sciences". The term is also translated as human studies, the humanities, cultural studies or the social sciences.Rickman, H.P., Introduction to Wilhelm Dilthey, Pattern and Meaning in History. Harper: 1961 p. 23. Its literal meaning, however, is the sciences of the mind or spirit. It is not meant to be a branch of natural science.
Spiritual science is often used as a synonym for anthroposophy. The latter, however, refers more narrowly to the work of Rudolf Steiner and the movement connected with him, while spiritual science refers more broadly to any research that uses the methodology of science to explore cultural, human or spiritual experience.
Two pupils of Dilthey carried his philosophical approach forward:
Later phenomenological philosophers generally have not followed up Husserl's work on the spiritual level of reality.
Rudolf Steiner called his research Geisteswissenschaft, which has the triple meaning in English of the Humanities generally, of a science of the mind, and of spiritual science. He reported his evolving methodology in a series of books; of these, the most relevant are: The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity and How to Attain Knowledge of Higher Worlds. He also reported on a vast number of research results, both in a series of books (e.g. Theosophy: An Introduction and An Outline of Occult Science) and in many lectures, about 6000 of which were transcribed and are now published.
Steiner's cultural-scientific research extended into nearly every aspect of human life; the major categories of his publications (those for which there are multiple published works devoted solely to the theme) include art, eurythmy, speech and drama, music, fine arts and architecture, art history, education, medicine, science, agriculture, sociology, Christianity and religion. His declared purpose was to bring a new foundation to human existence, and he certainly succeeded in bringing significant impulses to many realms, as out of his work has come a new kind of education, medicine, agriculture, phenomenological approach to science (often called Goethean science), jurisprudence, sociology, psychology, art, and other new directions. Central to his work is a unique view of the human being as a reincarnating, developing soul originating in a spiritual existence and indwelling a bodily organization composed of the physical body; a life and rhythmic organization; and consciousness. Steiner describes a complex interaction of destiny and freedom with considerable scope for free will.
The Templeton Prize is awarded yearly to a recognized scientist for "progress toward research or discoveries about spiritual realities". It has been given to John Barrow, Charles H. Townes, George Ellis, Holmes Rolston III, John Polkinghorne, Arthur Peacocke, Freeman Dyson and many others.
Dilthey's work was largely subsumed under the wave of empirical sociology, psychology and history that followed him. This tradition consciously ignored all inner experience; for Dilthey, the essence of the human sciences was that they were bound up with inner experience.
Husserl's own followers were challenged to follow his approach to inner experience, which tread a path between pure subjectivism in the tradition of Berkeley and pure objectivism in the tradition of Locke.Held, Klaus, introduction to Edmund Husserl's Die phänomenologische Methode I. Stuttgart 1985. Thus, his comments on "Geisteswissenschaft" have elicited little philosophical echo.
Steiner often did not cite his own research approach when reporting results. This has raised the question of the replicability of his results. In fact, even the methodology itself (insofar as he reported this) is extremely difficult to replicate. Steiner recognized this problem but seems to have been unable to train others to anything like his own apparent level of competence here.
Anthroposophy | Metaphysics | 20th century philosophers | Phenomenology | Rudolf Steiner
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Spiritual science".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world