In finance, short selling or "shorting" is a way to profit from the decline in price of a security, such as stock or a bond. Most investors "go long" on an investment, hoping that price will rise. To profit from the stock price going down, a short seller can borrow a security and sell it, hoping that it will decrease in value so that they can buy it back at a lower price and keep the difference. For example, assume that shares in XYZ Company currently sell for $10 per share. A short seller would borrow 100 shares of XYZ Company, and then immediately sell those shares for a total of $1000. If the price of XYZ shares later falls to $8 per share, the short seller would then buy 100 shares back for $800, return the shares to their original owner, and make a $200 profit. This practice has the potential for an unlimited loss, for example, if the shares of XYZ that one borrowed and sold in fact went up to $25, the short seller would have to buy back all the shares at $2500, losing $1500.
However, the term "short selling" or "being short" is often used as a blanket term for all those strategies which allow an investor to gain from the decline in price of a security. Those strategies including buying options known as puts. In fact, what is many times labeled short selling is options or futures activity, since this activity greatly magnifies the gain that results from a securities price loss. For example, if the next earnings release of XYZ company is going to show that its profits declined somewhat in some of its divisions, its stock might decline only 5 percent when that information is released. Someone within the company who wants to trade in inside information however would probably not be satisifed with only a 5 percent gain on his short sell and instead would buy put options or other derivatives or futures to gain possibly 20 or more percent on the decline in the stock price of XYZ.
Moreover, less than 5% of all shorts are done by public investors and traders, whereas at least 95% of short sales are done by broker-dealers and market makers who do not even always have to own shares to sell them (i.e. Naked Short Selling).
The term "short" was in use from at least the mid-19th century. It is commonly understood that "short" is used because the short seller is in a deficit position with his brokerage house.
Short sellers were blamed (probably erroneously) for the Wall Street Crash of 1929. Regulations governing short selling were implemented in 1929 and in 1940. Political fallout from the 1929 crash led Congress to enact a law banning short sellers from selling shares during a sharp downturn. President Hoover condemned short sellers and even J. Edgar Hoover said he would investigate short sellers for their role in prolonging the Depression. Legislation introduced in 1940 banned mutual funds from short selling (this law was lifted in 1997).
When Wall Street "downgrades" a stock, one may reasonably assume that interested parties have already established a short position in (i.e. sold short) the stock being downgraded, as invariably the stock drops or even plummets when the "downgrade" hits the wire. Therefore, public investors are typically too late to short by the time the "downgrade" is heard on the news.
Some typical examples of mass short-selling activity are during "bubbles", such as the Internet bubble. At such periods, short-sellers sell hoping for a market correction. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announcements approving a drug often cause the market to react illogically due to media attention; short sellers use the opportunity to sell into the buying frenzy and wait for the exaggerated reaction to subside before covering their position. Negative news, such as litigation against a company will also entice professional traders to sell the stock short.
The short seller owes his broker and must repay the shortage when he covers his position. Technically, the broker usually in turn has borrowed the shares from some other investor who is holding his shares long; the broker itself seldom actually purchases the shares to loan to the short seller.
Example: Borrowing 100 shares from someone, selling them immediately at $1.00 - when the stock drops, you buy them back for $0.50 and give the 100 shares back to the original owner keeping the profit.
In the U.S., in order to sell stocks short, the seller must arrange for a broker-dealer to confirm that it is able to make delivery of the shorted securities. This is referred to as a "locate", and it is a legal requirement that U.S. regulated broker-dealers not permit their customers to short securities without first obtaining a locate. Brokers have a variety of means to borrow stocks in order to facilitate locates and make good delivery of the shorted security. The vast majority of stocks borrowed by U.S. brokers come from loans made by the leading custody banks and fund management companies (see list below). Sometimes, brokers are able to borrow stocks from their customers who own "long" positions. In these cases, if the customer has fully paid for the long position, the broker can not borrow the security without the express permission of the customer, and the broker must provide the customer with collateral and pay a fee to the customer. In cases where the customer has not fully paid for the long position (meaning, the customer borrowed money from the broker in order to finance the purchase of the security), the broker will not need to inform the customer that the long position is being used to effect delivery of another client's short sale.
Stock exchanges such as the NYSE or the NASDAQ typically give short interest or the Short ratio that gives the number of shares that have been sold short as a % of the total float. Alternatively, these can also be expressed as Short interest ratio or the short ratio which is the number of shares sold short as a % of the average daily volume. These can be useful tools to spot trends in stock price movements.
Note: One can also purchase a put option giving one the right (but not the obligation) to sell one's shares at a fixed price. In the event of a market decline, one could then oblige the counterparty to buy the stock at the agreed upon price, which would be higher than the current quoted price.
When the exchange rate has changed you buy the first currency again; this time you get more of it, and pay back the loan. Since you got more money than you had borrowed initially, you earn money. Of course, as for the reverse, the reverse.
An example of this is as follows: Let us say a trader wants to trade with the dollar and the Indian rupee currencies. Assume that the current market rate is $1=Rs.50 and the trader borrows Rs.100. With this, he buys $2. If the next day, the conversion rate becomes $1=Rs.51, then the trader sells his $2 and gets Rs.102. He returns Rs.100 and keeps the Rs.2 profit.
There is no formal loan: it's your good name; you agree that you compensate if your trade goes bad. As far as you are speculating: the broker will check your credit; what otherwise you do, is up to you. Of course, if one has a history of defaulting on brokers, they have little chance of obtaining loans in the future.
One may also take a short position in a currency using futures or options; the preceding method is used to bet on the spot price, which is more directly analogous to selling a stock short.
Many short sellers place a "stop loss order" with their stockbroker after selling a stock short. This is an order to the brokerage to cover the position if the price of the stock should rise to a certain level, in order to limit the loss and avoid the problem of unlimited liability described above. In some cases, if the stock's price skyrockets, the stockbroker may decide to cover the short seller's position immediately and without his consent, in order to guarantee that the short seller will be able to make good on his debt of shares.
Short selling is sometimes referred to as a "negative income investment strategy" because there is no potential for dividend income or interest income. One's return is strictly from capital gains.
Short sellers must be aware of the potential for a short squeeze. This is a sharp uptick in the price of a stock, caused by large numbers of short sellers covering their positions on that stock. This can occur if the price has risen to a point where these people simply decide to cut their losses and get out. (This may occur in an automated way if the short sellers had previously placed stop-loss orders with their brokers to prepare for this eventuality.) Since covering their positions involves buying shares, the short squeeze causes an ever further rise in the stock's price, which in turn may trigger additional covering.
On occasion, a short squeeze is deliberately induced. This can happen when a large investor (a company or a wealthy individual) notices significant short positions, and buys many shares, with the intent of selling the position at a profit to the short sellers who will be panicked by the initial uptick.
Short sellers have to deliver the securities to their broker eventually. At that point they will need money to buy them, so there is a credit risk for the broker. To reduce this, the short seller has to keep a margin with the broker.
Short sellers must also be aware of the potential for liquidity squeezes. This occurs when a lack of potential supply, or an excess of coverers, makes it difficult to cover the short sellers' position. Because of this, most short sellers restrict their activities to heavily traded stocks, and they keep an eye on the "short interest" levels of their short investments. Short interest is defined as the total number of shares that have been sold short, but not yet covered.
Finally, short sellers must remember that they are betting against the overall upward direction of the market. This, combined with interest costs, can make it unattractive to keep a short position open for a long duration.
Advocates of short sellers say that the practice is an essential part of the price discovery mechanism. They state that short-seller scrutiny of companies' finances has led to the discovery of instances of fraud which were glossed over or ignored by investors who had held the companies' stock long. Some hedge funds and short sellers claimed that the accounting of Enron and Tyco was suspicious, months before their respective financial scandals emerged.
Responding to concerns over short-selling, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) instituted an uptick rule in reaction to the Crash of 1929. The rule provides that a short seller cannot sell a stock short unless on an uptick or a zero-plus tick; this means the stock can only be sold short if the last non-zero "tick" (i.e. trade price) was higher than the preceding one. In doing so, U.S. market regulators are trying to make sure that short sellers are not, by themselves, causing the price depreciation, and that downwards pressure on the stock price is balanced by new buying demand.
In the U.S., Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) cannot be sold short for a month after they start trading. This mechanism is in place to ensure a degree of price stability during a company's initial trading period. However, some penny stock brokerages (also known as bucket shops) have used the lack of short selling during this month to pump and dump thinly traded IPOs. Canada and other countries do allow selling IPOs (including U.S. IPOs) short.
On 2003-10-29 the SEC * announced a one year pilot program to suspend the uptick rule for 1000 listed and NASDAQ traded stocks selected from the 3000 most liquid securities.
Leerverkauf | Vendita allo scoperto | מכירה בחסר | Shorte | Krótka sprzedaż | Продажа без покрытия | Blankning
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Short selling".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world