In group theory, a semidirect product describes a particular way in which a group can be put together from two subgroups, one of which is normal.
Let G be a group, N a normal subgroup of G (i.e., ) and H a subgroup of G. The following statements are equivalent:
If G is the semidirect product of the normal subgroup N and the subgroup H, and both N and H are finite, then the order of G equals the product of the orders of N and H.
Note that, as opposed to the case with the direct product, a semidirect product is not, in general, unique; if G and G' are two groups which both contain N as a normal subgroup and H as a subgroup, and both are a semidirect product of N and H, then it does not follow that G and G' are isomorphic. This remark leads to an extension problem, of describing the possibilities.
If G is a semidirect product of N and H, then the map φ : H → Aut(N) (where Aut(N) denotes the group of all automorphisms of N) defined by φ(h)(n) = hnh–1 for all h in H and n in N is a group homomorphism. Together N, H and φ determine G up to isomorphism, as we show now.
Given any two groups N and H (not necessarily subgroups of a given group) and a group homomorphism φ : H → Aut(N), define a new group N ×φ H, the semidirect product of N and H with respect to φ, as follows: the underlying set is the cartesian product N × H, and the group operation * is given by
Conversely, suppose that we are given an internal semidirect product as defined above, i.e. a group G with a normal subgroup N, a subgroup H, and such that every element g of G may be written uniquely in the form g=nh where n lies in N and h lies in H. Let φ : H→Aut(N) be the homomorphism
A version of the splitting lemma for groups states that a group G is isomorphic to a semidirect product of the two groups N and H if and only if there exists a short exact sequence
and a group homomorphism γ : H → G such that α γ = idH, the identity map on H. In this case, φ : H → Aut(N) is given by
The dihedral group Dn with 2n elements is isomorphic to a semidirect product of the cyclic groups Cn and C2. Here, the non-identity element of C2 acts on Cn by inverting elements; this is an automorphism since Cn is abelian. The presentation for this group is:
More generally, a semidirect product of any two cyclic groups with generator and with generator is given by a single relation with and coprime, i.e. the presentation:
If and are coprime, is a generator of and , hence the presentation:
gives an group isomorphic to the previous one.
The Euclidean group of all rigid motions (isometries) of the plane (maps f : R2 → R2 such that the Euclidean distance between x and y equals the distance between f(x) and f(y) for all x and y in R2) is isomorphic to a semidirect product of the abelian group R2 (which describes translations) and the group O(2) of orthogonal 2×2 matrices (which describes rotations and reflections which keep the origin fixed). n is a translation, h a rotation or reflection. Applying a translation and then a rotation or reflection corresponds to applying the rotation or reflection first and then a translation by the rotated or reflected translation vector (i.e. applying the conjugate of the original translation). Every orthogonal matrix acts as an automorphism on R2 by matrix multiplication.
The orthogonal group O(n) of all orthogonal real n×n matrices (intuitively the set of all rotations and reflections of n-dimensional space which keep the origin fixed) is isomorphic to a semidirect product of the group SO(n) (consisting of all orthogonal matrices with determinant 1, intuitively the rotations of n-dimensional space) and C2. If we represent C2 as the multiplicative group of matrices {I, R}, where R is a reflection of n dimensional space which keeps the origin fixed (i.e. an orthogonal matrix with determinant –1 representing an involution), then φ : C2 → Aut(SO(n)) is given by φ(H)(N) = H N H–1 for all H in C2 and N in SO(n). In the non-trivial case ( H is not the identity) this means that φ(H) is conjugation of operations by the reflection (a rotation axis and the direction of rotation are replaced by their "mirror image").
Suppose G is a semidirect product of the normal subgroup N and the subgroup H. If H is also normal in G, or equivalently, if there exists a homomorphism G → N which is the identity on N, then G is the direct product of N and H.
The direct product of two groups N and H can be thought of as the outer semidirect product of N and H with respect to φ(h) = idN for all h in H.
Note that in a direct product, the order of the factors is not important, since N × H is isomorphic to H × N. This is not the case for semidirect products, as the two factors play different roles.
The construction of semidirect products can be pushed much further. There is a version in ring theory, the crossed product of rings. This is seen naturally as soon as one constructs a group ring for a semidirect product of groups. There is also the semidirect sum of Lie algebras. Given a group action on a topological space, there is a corresponding crossed product which will in general be non-commutative even if the group is abelian. This kind of ring (see crossed product for a related construction) can play the role of the space of orbits of the group action, in cases where that space cannot be approached by conventional topological techniques - for example in the work of Alain Connes (cf. noncommutative geometry).
There are also far-reaching generalisations in category theory. They show how to construct fibred categories from indexed categories. This is an abstract form of the outer semidirect product construction.
Sources differ in their notation for the semidirect product. Some texts discuss it with no explicit notation. Others use the subscripted "times" symbol (×φ) as above to modify the direct product by inclusion of a homomorphism, writing the normal group on the left. Other notation reshapes the times symbol; Unicode * lists four variants:
Although the Unicode description of the rtimes symbol says "right normal factor", a number of authors use it with a left normal factor. Therefore the usual caution for mathematical notation applies: When reading, be careful to notice the conventions adopted by the author, and when writing, explain notation choices for the reader. The choice of symbol may vary, but putting the normal factor on the left seems fairly consistent.
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Semidirect product".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world