In mathematics, a prime number (or a prime) is a natural number that has exactly two (distinct) natural number divisors, which are 1 and the prime number itself. There exists an infinitude of prime numbers, as demonstrated by Euclid in about 300 B.C.. The first 30 prime numbers are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97, 101, 103, 107, 109, and 113 ; see the list of prime numbers for a longer list.
The property of being a prime is called primality, and the word prime is also used as an adjective. Since 2 is the only even prime number, the term odd prime refers to all prime numbers greater than 2.
The study of prime numbers is part of number theory, the branch of mathematics which encompasses the study of natural numbers. Prime numbers have been the subject of intense research, yet some fundamental questions remain such as the Riemann hypothesis or the Goldbach conjecture, which have been open for more than a century. The problem of modeling the distribution of prime numbers is a popular subject of investigation for number theorists: When looking at individual numbers, the primes seem to be randomly distributed, but the "global" distribution of primes follows well-defined laws.
The notion of prime number has been generalized in many different branches of mathematics. In the context of ring theory, a branch of abstract algebra, the term "prime element" has a specific meaning. Here, a ring element a is defined to be prime if whenever a divides b c for ring elements b and c, then a divides at least one of b or c. With this meaning, the additive inverse of any prime number is also prime. In other words, when considering the set of integers as a ring, is a prime element. Without further specification, however, "prime number" always means a positive integer prime. Among rings of complex algebraic integers, Eisenstein primes and Gaussian primes may also be of interest.
Ancient Greeks such as Pythagoras are believed to have been the first to study prime numbers, and the simple sieve method for finding them is attributed to Eratosthenes.
Until the 19th century most mathematicians considered the number 1 a prime, and there is still a large body of mathematical work that is still valid despite labelling 1 a prime, such as the work of Stern and Zeisel. Henri Lebesgue is said to be the last professional mathematician to call 1 prime. The change in label occurred so that it can be said 'each number has a unique factorization into primes.' Gowers, 2002, p. 118: "The seemingly arbitrary exclusion of 1 from the definition of a prime ... does not express some deep fact about numbers: it just happens to be a useful convention, adopted so there is only one way of factorizing any given number into primes." See also Arguments for and against the primality of 1.
For a long time, prime numbers were thought as having no possible application outside of number theory; this changed in the 1970s when the concepts of public-key cryptography were invented, in which prime numbers formed the basis of the first algorithms such as the RSA cryptosystem or the Diffie-Hellman key-exchange algorithm.
The fundamental theorem of arithmetic states that every positive integer larger than 1 can be written as a product of primes in a unique way, i.e. unique except for the order. Primes are thus the "basic building blocks" of the natural numbers. For example, we can write
and any other factorization of 23244 as the product of primes will be identical except for the order of the factors. See prime factorization algorithm for details for how to do this in practice for larger numbers.
The importance of this theorem is one of the reasons for the exclusion of 1 from the set of prime numbers. If 1 were admitted as a prime, the precise statement of the theorem would require additional qualifications.
Suppose you have a finite number of primes. Call this number m. Multiply all m primes together and add one (see Euclid number). The resulting number is not divisible by any of the finite set of primes, because dividing by any of these would give a remainder of one. And one is not divisible by any primes. Therefore it must either be prime itself, or be divisible by some other prime that was not included in the finite set. Either way, there must be at least m + 1 primes. But this argument applies no matter what m is; it applies to m + 1, too. So there are more primes than any given finite number.
This previous argument explains why the product of m primes + 1 must be divisible by some prime not in the finite set of primes.
Other mathematicians have given their own proofs. One of those (due to Euler) shows that the sum of the reciprocals of all prime numbers diverges to infinity. Kummer's is particularly elegant and Harry Furstenberg provides one using general topology.Furstenberg, Harry. On the infinitude of primes. Amer. Math. Monthly 62, (1955), p. 353. A description of the proof is also available at http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1460203
Provided one is not asking this of too large a value, one can use the prime counting function π(x) to find out exactly how many primes there are less than x. Values of x as large as 1020 can be calculated quickly and accurately with modern computers. Thus, e.g., π(100000) = 9592.
For larger values of x beyond the reach of modern equipment, the prime number theorem provides a good heuristic estimate.
The Sieve of Eratosthenes is a simple way, and the Sieve of Atkin a fast way, to compute the list of all prime numbers up to a given limit.
In practice, though, one usually wants to check whether a given number is prime, rather than generate a list of primes. Further, it is often satisfactory to know the answer with a high probability. It is possible to quickly check whether a given large number (say, up to a few thousand digits) is prime using probabilistic primality tests. These typically pick a random number called a "witness" and check some formula involving the witness and the potential prime N. After several iterations, they declare N to be "definitely composite" or "probably prime". Some of these tests are not perfect: there may be some composite numbers, called pseudoprimes for the respective test, that will be declared "probably prime" no matter what witness is chosen. However, the most popular probabilistic tests do not suffer from this drawback.
One method for determining whether a number is prime is to divide by all primes less than or equal to the square root of that number. If any of the divisions come out as an integer, then the original number is not a prime. Otherwise, it is a prime. One need not actually calculate the square root; once one sees that the quotients exceed the divisors, one can stop. This is known as trial division; it is the simplest primality test and it quickly becomes impractical for testing large integers because the number of possible factors grows exponentially as the number of digits in the number-to-be-tested increases.
The least efficient algorithm starts out with a list containing just the number 2, then tries dividing each subsequent number by the primes already in the list. If it is not divisible evenly by any of them, it is added to the list. But if it is divisible evenly by any number already on the list, the program moves on to the next candidate.
The simplest, most elegant algorithm is perhaps the sieve of Eratosthenes.
limit = 1000000; // arbitrary search limit
for (i = 2; i <= limit; i++) {
is_prime* = true // assume all numbers are prime at first
}
for (n = 2; n <= sqrt (limit); n++) {
if (is_prime*) {
// eliminate multiples of each prime, starting with its square
for (i = n^2; i <= limit; i += n) { is_prime* = false }
}
}
for (n = 2; n =< limit; n++) {
if is_prime* then print n
}
A more complicated, but more efficient algorithm (when properly optimized) is the sieve of Atkin. Its basic structure is as follows.
limit = 1000000 // arbitrary search limit
for (n = 5; n <= limit; n++) {
is_prime* = false // initialize the sieve
}
// put in candidate primes:
// integers which have an odd number of representations by certain quadratic forms
for (x = 1; x <= sqrt (limit); x++) {
for (y = 1; y <= sqrt (limit); y++) {
n = 4x^2+y^2
if n <= limit and n mod 12 == 1 or 5 then is_prime= not (is_prime[n)
n = 3x^2+y^2
if n <= limit and n mod 12 == 7 then is_prime= not (is_prime[n)
n = 3x^2-y^2
if x > y and n <= limit and n mod 12 == 11 then is_prime= not (is_prime[n)
}
}
// eliminate composites by sieving
for (n = 5; n <= sqrt (limit); n++) {
if is_prime* then {
// n is prime, omit multiples of its square; this is sufficient because
// composites which managed to get on the list cannot be square-free
for (k = n^2; k <= limit; k += n^2) {
is_prime* = false
}
}
}
print 2, 3
for (n = 5; n <= limit; n++) {
if is_prime* then print n
}
A primality test algorithm is an algorithm which tests a number for primality, i.e. whether the number is a prime number.
A probable prime is an integer which, by virtue of having passed a certain test, is considered to be probably prime. Probable primes which are in fact composite (such as Carmichael numbers) are called pseudoprimes.
In 2002, Indian scientists at IIT Kanpur discovered a new deterministic algorithm known as the AKS algorithm. The amount of time that this algorithm takes to check whether a number N is prime depends on a polynomial function of the number of digits of N (i.e. of the logarithm of N).
There is no known formula for primes which is more efficient at finding primes than the methods mentioned above under "Finding prime numbers".
There is a set of Diophantine equations in 9 variables and one parameter with the following property: the parameter is prime if and only if the resulting system of equations has a solution over the natural numbers. This can be used to obtain a single formula with the property that all its positive values are prime.
There is no polynomial, even in several variables, that takes only prime values. For example, the curious polynomial in one variable f(n) = n2 − n + 41 yields primes for n = 0,..., 40, but f(41) is composite. However, there are polynomials in several variables, whose positive values as the variables take all positive integer values are exactly the primes.
Another formula is based on Wilson's theorem mentioned above, and generates the number two many times and all other primes exactly once. There are other similar formulae which also produce primes.
A prime p is called primorial or prime-factorial if it has the form p = Π(n) ± 1 for some number n, where Π(n) stands for the product 2 · 3 · 5 · 7 · 11 · ... of all the primes ≤ n. A prime is called factorial if it is of the form n! ± 1. The first factorial primes are:
The largest known primorial prime is Π(392113) + 1, found by Heuer in 2001.The largest known factorial prime is 34790! − 1, found by Marchal, Carmody and Kuosa in 2002.[http://primes.utm.edu/top20/page.php?id=30 It is not known whether there are infinitely many primorial or factorial primes.
Primes of the form 2n − 1 are known as Mersenne primes, while primes of the form are known as Fermat primes. Prime numbers p where 2p + 1 is also prime are known as Sophie Germain primes. The following list is of other special types of prime numbers that come from formulas:
Some primes are classified according to the properties of their digits in decimal or other bases. For example, numbers whose digits form a palindromic sequence are called palindromic primes, and a prime number is called a truncatable prime if successively removing the first digit at the left or the right yields only new prime numbers.
The prime numbers are distributed among the natural numbers in an unpredictable way, but there do appear to be laws governing their behavior. Leonhard Euler commented
Let pn denote the nth prime number (i.e. p1 = 2, p2 = 3, etc.). The gap gn between the consecutive primes pn and pn + 1 is the difference between them, i.e.
We have g1 = 3 − 2 = 1, g2 = 5 − 3 = 2, g3 = 7 − 5 = 2, g4 = 11 − 7 = 4, and so on. The sequence (gn) of prime gaps has been extensively studied.
For any natural number N larger than 1, the sequence (for the notation N! read factorial)
is a sequence of N − 1 consecutive composite integers. Therefore, there exist gaps between primes which are arbitrarily large, i.e. for any natural number N, there is an integer n with gn > N. (Choose n so that pn is the greatest prime number less than N! + 2.)
On the other hand, the gaps get arbitrarily small in proportion to the primes: the quotient gn/pn approaches zero as n approaches infinity. Note also that the twin prime conjecture asserts that gn = 2 for infinitely many integers n.
The largest known prime, as of December 2005, is 230402457 − 1 (this number is 9,152,052 digits long); it is the 43rd known Mersenne prime. M30402457 was found on December 15, 2005 by Curtis Cooper and Steven Boone, professors at Central Missouri State University and members of a collaborative effort known as GIMPS. Before finding the prime, Cooper and Boone ran the GIMPS program on a peak of 700 CMSU computers for 9 years.
The next two largest known primes are also Mersenne Primes: M25964951=225964951 − 1 (42nd known Mersenne prime, 7,816,230 digits long) and M24036583=224036583 − 1 (41st known Mersenne prime, 7,235,733 digits long). Historically, the largest known prime has almost always been a Mersenne prime since the dawn of electronic computers, because there exists a particularly fast primality test for numbers of this form, the Lucas-Lehmer test for Mersenne numbers.
The largest known prime that is not a Mersenne prime is 27653 × 29167433 + 1 (2,759,677 digits). This is also the sixth largest known prime of any form. It was found by the Seventeen or Bust project and it brings them one step closer to solving the Sierpinski problem.
Some of the largest primes not known to have any particular form (that is, no simple formula such as that of Mersenne primes) have been found by taking a piece of semi-random binary data, converting it to a number n, multiplying it by 256k for some positive integer k, and searching for possible primes within the interval 256k(n + 1) − 1.
The concept of prime number is so important that it has been generalized in different ways in various branches of mathematics.
One can define prime elements and irreducible elements in any integral domain. For the ring Z of integers, the set of prime elements equals the set of irreducible elements; it's {...−11, −7, −5, −3, −2, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, ...}.
As an example, we consider the Gaussian integers Z*, that is, complex numbers of the form a + bi with a and b in Z. This is an integral domain, and its prime elements are the Gaussian primes. Note that 2 is not a Gaussian prime, because it factors into the product of the two Gaussian primes (1 + i) and (1 − i). The element 3, however, remains prime in the Gaussian integers. In general, rational primes (i.e. prime elements in the ring Z of integers) of the form 4k + 3 are Gaussian primes, whereas rational primes of the form 4k + 1 are not.
In ring theory, one generally replaces the notion of number with that of ideal. Prime ideals are an important tool and object of study in commutative algebra, algebraic number theory and algebraic geometry. The prime ideals of the ring of integers are the ideals (0), (2), (3), (5), (7), (11), ...
A central problem in algebraic number theory is how a prime ideal factors when it is lifted to an extension field. For example, in the Gaussian integer example above, (2) ramifies into a prime power (1 + i and 1 − i generate the same prime ideal), prime ideals of the form (4k + 3) are inert (remain prime), and prime ideals of the form (4k + 1) split (are the product of 2 distinct prime ideals).
In class field theory yet another generalization is used. Given an arbitrary field K, one considers valuations on K, certain functions from K to the real numbers R. Every such valuation yields a topology on K, and two valuations are called equivalent if they yield the same topology. A prime of K (sometimes called a place of K) is an equivalence class of valuations. With this definition, the primes of the field Q of rational numbers are represented by the standard absolute value function (known as the "infinite prime") as well as by the p-adic valuations on Q, for every prime number p.
There are many open questions about prime numbers. The most significant of these is the Riemann hypothesis, which essentially says that the primes are as regularly distributed as possible. From a physical viewpoint, it roughly states that the irregularity in the distribution of primes only comes from random noise. From a mathematical viewpoint, it roughly states that the asymptotic distribution of primes (about 1/ log x of number less than x are primes, the prime number theorem) also holds for much shorter intervals of length about the square root of x (for intervals near x). This hypothesis is generally believed to be correct, in particular, the simplest assumption is that primes should have no significant irregularities without good reason.
Other famous conjectures have a much greater chance of being true (in a formal sense, they follow from simple heuristic probabilistic arguments) with the lack of a solution more likely a reflection of the lack of suitable proof tools:
For a long time, number theory in general, and the study of prime numbers in particular, was seen as the canonical example of pure mathematics, with no applications outside of the self-interest of studying the topic. In particular, number theorists such as British mathematician G. H. Hardy prided themselves on doing work that had absolutely no military significance.No one has yet discovered any warlike purpose to be served by the theory of numbers or relativity, and it seems unlikely that anyone will do so for many years. G. H. Hardy, A Mathematician's Apology However, this vision was shattered in the 1970s, when it was publicly announced that prime numbers could be used as the basis for the creation of public key cryptography algorithms. Prime numbers are also used for hash tables and pseudorandom number generators.
Several public-key cryptography algorithms, such as RSA, are based on extremely large prime numbers (that is, greater than 10100).
Many numbers occur in nature, and inevitably some of these are prime. There are, however, relatively few examples of numbers that appear in nature because they are prime. For example, starfish have 5 'legs', which is a prime number. However there is no evidence to suggest that starfish have 5 'legs' because 5 is a prime number; insects seem to manage just fine with 6 legs.
One example of the use of prime numbers in nature is as an evolutionary strategy used by different species of insects called cicadas (both from the subspecies magicicada) which emerge in Eastern North America every 13 or 17 years to breed. The logic for this in nature appears to be that a predator specializing in magicicadas would have to emerge at the exact same frequency to find its prey.Paulo R. A. Campos, Viviane M. de Oliveira, Ronaldo Giro, and Douglas S. Galvão. Emergence of Prime Numbers as the Result of Evolutionary Strategy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 098107 (2004) If magicicadas had appeared say every 12 years, then predators appearing every 2, 3, 4, 6, or 12 years would be sure to meet them. Over a 200-year period, average predator populations during hypothetical outbreaks of 14- and 15-year cicadas would be up to 2% higher than during outbreaks of 13- and 17-year cicadas.The Economist. Invasion of the Brood. 6 May 2004. Though small, this appears enough to drive natural selection towards a prime-numbered life-cycle in this insect.
In an episode of The Next Generation, two mutually unintelligible sentient life forms use the beginning sequence of prime numbers to communicate the fact that they are intelligent, thinking beings.
In Stephen King's novels The Waste Lands and Wizard and Glass, the protagonists solve a puzzle using primes in order to ride on the sentient and deranged train, Blaine the Mono.
In Mark Haddon's novel The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time, the main character is fascinated by prime numbers, and in the book the chapters are numbered with primes.
In the Stargate Atlantis episode "Hot Zone", physicists Rodney McKay and Radek Zelenka play the game "Prime or Not Prime" in which players randomly name numbers and expect the other player or players to determine whether the number is prime.
In Carl Sagan's Contact a message from outer space is sent to humanity. This message is hashed into pieces and comes in intervals of incremented prime numbers from 2 to 101.
In the movie Cube, prime numbers are used by the characters to escape from a mysterious facility.
Integer sequences | Prime numbers
Priemgetal | Frumtæl | عدد أولي | মৌলিক সংখ্যা | Sò͘-sò͘ | Просты лік | Просто число | Nombre primer | Prvočíslo | Primtal | Primzahl | Algarv | Πρώτος αριθμός | Número primo | Primo | Zenbaki lehen | اعداد اول | Nombre premier | Número primo | 소수 (수론) | Prosti broj | Bilangan prima | Frumtala | Numero primo | מספר ראשוני | Numerus primus | Primzuel | Pirminis skaičius | Prímszámok | Priemgetal | 素数 | Primtall | Primtal | Primtall | Liczby pierwsze | Número primo | Простое число | Nùmmuru primu | Prime number | Prvočíslo | Praštevilo | Прост број | Alkuluku | Primtal | จำนวนเฉพาะ | Asal sayılar | Số nguyên tố | Просте число | 素数
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Prime number".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world