The mathematical constant π is an irrational number, approximately equal to 3.14159, which is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter in Euclidean geometry, and has many uses in mathematics, physics, and engineering. It is also known as Archimedes' constant (not to be confused with Archimedes number) and as Ludolph's number.
The name of the Greek letter π is pi, and this spelling is used in typographical contexts where the Greek letter is not available or where its usage could be problematic. When referring to this constant, the symbol π is always pronounced like "pie" in English, the conventional English pronunciation of the letter.
The constant is named π because it is the first letter of the Greek words "περιφέρεια" (periphery) and "περίμετρον" (perimeter). The Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler proposed that this number be given a particular name and suggested the use of π.
The numerical value of π, truncated to 50 decimal places is:
See the links below and those at sequence A00796 in OEIS for more digits.
There are few, if any, cases in engineering and science where more than a few dozen digits are needed; with the 50 digits given here, the circumference of any circle that would fit in the observable universe (ignoring the curvature of space) could be computed with an error less than the size of a proton. Nevertheless, the exact value of π has an infinite decimal expansion: its decimal expansion never ends and does not repeat, since π is an irrational number (and indeed, a transcendental number). This infinite sequence of digits has fascinated mathematicians and laymen alike, and much effort over the last few centuries has been put into computing more digits and investigating the number's properties. Despite much analytical work, and supercomputer calculations that have determined over 1 trillion digits of π, no pattern in the digits has ever been found. Digits of π are available on many web pages, and there is software for calculating π to billions of digits on any personal computer. See history of numerical approximations of π.
The formulae often given for calculating the digits of π have desirable mathematical properties, but are often hard to understand without a background in trigonometry and calculus. Nevertheless, it is possible to compute π using techniques involving only algebra and geometry.
For example, one common classroom activity for experimentally measuring the value of π involves drawing a large circle on graph paper, then measuring its approximate area by counting the number of cells inside the circle. Since the area of the circle is known to be , π can be derived using algebra: .
This process works mathematically as well as experimentally. If a circle with radius r is drawn with its center at the point (0,0), any point whose distance from the origin is less than r will fall inside the circle. The pythagorean theorem gives the distance from any point (x,y) to the center: . Mathematical "graph paper" is formed by imagining a 1x1 square centered around each point (x,y), where x and y are integers between -r and r. Squares whose center resides inside the circle can then be counted by testing whether, for each point (x,y),
The total number of points satisfying that condition thus approximates the area of the circle, which then can be used to calculate an approximation of π. Mathematically, this formula can be written:
In other words, count up all points (x,y) in which both x and y are between -r and r to find the approximate area of the circle. Then divide by r2 to find the approximation of π. Closer approximations can be produced by using larger values of r.
Similarly, all of the more complex approximations of π given below involve repeated calculations of some sort, yielding closer and closer approximations with increasing numbers of calculations.
Furthermore, π is also transcendental, as was proven by Ferdinand von Lindemann in 1882. This means that there is no polynomial with rational coefficients of which π is a root. An important consequence of the transcendence of π is the fact that it is not constructible. Because the coordinates of all points that can be constructed with compass and straightedge are constructible numbers, it is impossible to square the circle: that is, it is impossible to construct, using compass and straightedge alone, a square whose area is equal to the area of a given circle.
Often William Jones' book A New Introduction to Mathematics from 1706 is cited as the first text where the Greek letter π was used for this constant, but this notation became popular especially since Leonhard Euler adopted it some years later, (cf. History of π).
The value of π has been known in some form since antiquity. As early as the 19th century BC, Babylonian mathematicians were using π = 25/8, which is within 0.5% of the true value.
The Egyptian scribe Ahmes wrote the oldest known text to give an approximate value for π, citing a Middle Kingdom papyrus, corresponding to a value of 256 divided by 81 or 3.160.
It is sometimes claimed that the Bible states that π = 3, based on a passage in 1 Kings 7:23 giving measurements for a round basin as having a 10 cubit diameter and a 30 cubit circumference. Rabbi Nehemiah explained this by the diameter being from outside to outside while the circumference was the inner brim; but it may suffice that the measurements are given in round numbers. Also, the basin may not have been exactly circular.
Archimedes of Syracuse discovered, by considering the perimeters of 96-sided polygons inscribing a circle and inscribed by it, that π is between 223/71 and 22/7. The average of these two values is roughly 3.1419.
The Chinese mathematician Liu Hui computed π to 3.141014 (good to three decimal places) in AD 263 and suggested that 3.14 was a good approximation.
The Indian mathematician and astronomer Aryabhata in the 5th century gave the approximation π = 62832/20000 = 3.1416, correct when rounded off to four decimal places.
The Chinese mathematician and astronomer Zu Chongzhi computed π to be between 3.1415926 and 3.1415927 and gave two approximations of π, 355/113 and 22/7, in the 5th century.
The Indian mathematician and astronomer Madhava of Sangamagrama in the 14th century computed the value of π after transforming the power series expansion of π /4 into the form
and using the first 21 terms of this series to compute a rational approximation of π correct to 11 decimal places as 3.14159265359. By adding a remainder term to the original power series of π /4, he was able to compute π to an accuracy of 13 decimal places.
The astronomer Ghyath ad-din Jamshid Kashani (1350-1439) correctly computed π to 9 digits in the base of 60, which is equivalent to 16 decimal digits as:
The German mathematician Ludolph van Ceulen in 1615 computed the first 32 decimal places of π. He was so proud of this accomplishment that he had them inscribed on his tombstone.
In 1789, the Slovene mathematician Jurij Vega improved John Machin's formula from 1706 and calculated the first 140 decimal places for π of which the first 126 were correct * and held the world record for 52 years until 1841, when William Rutherford calculated 208 decimal places of which the first 152 were correct.
The English amateur mathematician William Shanks, a man of independent means, spent over 20 years calculating π to 707 decimal places (accomplished in 1873). In 1944, D. F. Ferguson found that Shanks had made a mistake in the 528th decimal place, and that all succeeding digits were fallacious. By 1947, Ferguson had recalculated pi to 808 decimal places (with the aid of a mechanical desk calculator).
Due to the transcendental nature of π, there are no closed form expressions for the number in terms of algebraic numbers and functions. Roughly speaking, this means that any formula which uses simple math operations to calculate π must go on forever. This is why formulæ for calculating π are often written with a "..." to indicate that in order to reach π exactly, an infinite number of additional terms would have to follow the terms given.
Consequently, numerical calculations must use approximations of π. For many purposes, 3.14 or 22/7 is close enough, although engineers often use 3.1416 (5 significant figures) or 3.14159 (6 significant figures) for more accuracy. The approximations 22/7 and 355/113, with 3 and 7 significant figures respectively, are obtained from the simple continued fraction expansion of π. The approximation 355/113 (3.1415929…) is the best one that may be expressed with a three-digit numerator and denominator.
The earliest numerical approximation of π is almost certainly the value . In cases where little precision is required, it may be an acceptable substitute. That 3 is an underestimate follows from the fact that it is the ratio of the perimeter of an inscribed regular hexagon to the diameter of the circle.
All further improvements to the above mentioned "historical" approximations were done with the help of computers.
| Geometrical shape | Formula |
|---|---|
| Circumference of circle of radius r and diameter d | |
| Area of circle of radius r | |
| Area of ellipse with semiaxes a and b | |
| Volume of sphere of radius r and diameter d | |
| Surface area of sphere of radius r and diameter d | |
| Volume of cylinder of height h and radius r | |
| Surface area of cylinder of height h and radius r | |
| Volume of cone of height h and radius r | |
| Surface area of cone of height h and radius r |
(All of these are a consequence of the first one, as the area of a circle can be written as A = ∫(2πr) dr ("sum of annuli of infinitesimal width"), and others concern a surface or solid of revolution.)
Also, the angle measure of 180° (degrees) is equal to π radians.
Here, "probability", "average", and "random" are taken in a limiting sense, e.g. we consider the probability for the set of integers {1, 2, 3,…, N}, and then take the limit as N approaches infinity.
The theory of elliptic curves and complex multiplication derives the approximation
Note that since , for any pdf f(x), the above formulæ can be used to produce other integral formulae for π.
A semi-interesting empirical approximation of π is based on Buffon's needle problem. Consider dropping a needle of length L repeatedly on a surface containing parallel lines drawn S units apart (with S > L). If the needle is dropped n times and x of those times it comes to rest crossing a line (x > 0), then one may approximate π using:
Another approximation of π is to throw points randomly into a quarter of a circle with radius 1 that is inscribed in a square of length 1. π, the area of a unit circle, is then approximated as 4*(points in the quarter circle) / (total points).
In the early years of the computer, the first expansion of π to 100,000 decimal places was computed by Maryland mathematician Dr. Daniel Shanks and his team at the United States Naval Research Laboratory (N.R.L.) in 1961. Dr. Shanks's son Oliver Shanks, also a mathematician, states that there is no family connection to William Shanks, and in fact, his family's roots are in Central Europe.
Daniel Shanks and his team used two different power series for calculating the digital of π. For one it was known that any error would produce a value slightly high, and for the other, it was known that any error would produce a value slightly low. And hence, as long as the two series produced the same digits, there was a very high confidence that they were correct. The first 100,000 digits of π were published by the US Naval Research Laboratory
None of the formulæ given above can serve as an efficient way of approximating π. For fast calculations, one may use a formula such as Machin's:
together with the Taylor series expansion of the function arctan(x). This formula is most easily verified using polar coordinates of complex numbers, starting with
Formulæ of this kind are known as Machin-like formulae.
Many other expressions for π were developed and published by the incredibly intuitive Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan. He worked with mathematician Godfrey Harold Hardy in England for a number of years.
Extremely long decimal expansions of π are typically computed with the Gauss-Legendre algorithm and Borwein's algorithm; the Salamin-Brent algorithm which was invented in 1976 has also been used.
The first one million digits of π and 1/π are available from Project Gutenberg (see external links below). The current record (December 2002) by Yasumasa Kanada of Tokyo University stands at 1,241,100,000,000 digits, which were computed in September 2002 on a 64-node Hitachi supercomputer with 1 terabyte of main memory, which carries out 2 trillion operations per second, nearly twice as many as the computer used for the previous record (206 billion digits). The following Machin-like formulæ were used for this:
These approximations have so many digits that they are no longer of any practical use, except for testing new supercomputers. (Normality of π will always depend on the infinite string of digits on the end, not on any finite computation.)
In 1997, David H. Bailey, Peter Borwein and Simon Plouffe published a paper (Bailey, 1997) on a new formula for π as an infinite series:
This formula permits one to fairly readily compute the kth binary or hexadecimal digit of π, without having to compute the preceding k − 1 digits. Bailey's website contains the derivation as well as implementations in various programming languages. The PiHex project computed 64-bits around the quadrillionth bit of π (which turns out to be 0).
Fabrice Bellard claims to have beaten the efficiency record set by Bailey, Borwein, and Plouffe with his formula to calculate binary digits of π *:
Other formulæ that have been used to compute estimates of π include:
This converges extraordinarily rapidly. Ramanujan's work is the basis for the fastest algorithms used, as of the turn of the millennium, to calculate π.
In addition, the following expressions approximate π
In 1897, an amateur mathematician from Indiana believed that he had discovered a way to square the circle. He proposed a bill to the state legislature to have his discovery made into law. It was passed in the state House of Representatives but postponed indefinitely in the state Senate thanks to the intervention of a mathematics professor who was present in the capitol on other business. The bill, which subsequently entered folklore as the Indiana Pi Bill, contained several false mathematical claims from which commentators have extracted a number of apparent "values of π" including 3.2, 3.23.., 4, and 9.24....
Ever since computers have calculated π to billions of decimal places, memorising π has become a hobby for some people. The current unofficial world record is 83,431 decimal places, and was set by a Japanese mental health counsellor named Akira Haraguchi, who is currently 59 years of age.* Before Haraguchi accomplished this on July 2, 2005, the world record was 42,195, which was set by Hiroyuki Goto.
There are many ways to memorise π, including the use of piems, which are poems that represent π in a way such that the length of each word (in letters) represents a digit. Here is an example of a piem: How I need a drink, alcoholic in nature (or: of course), after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics. Notice how the first word has 3 letters, the second word has 1, the third has 4, the fourth has 1, the fifth has 5, and so on. The Cadaeic Cadenza contains the first 3834 digits of π in this manner. Piems are related to the entire field of humorous yet serious study that involves the use of mnemonic techniques to remember the digits of π, known as piphilology. See English mnemonics#Pi for examples. In other languages there are similar methods of memorisation. However, this method proves inefficient for large memorisations of pi. Other methods include remembering "patterns" in the numbers (for instance, the "year" 1971 appears in the first fifty digits of pi).
Bailey and Crandall showed in 2000 that the existence of the above mentioned Bailey-Borwein-Plouffe formula and similar formulæ imply that the normality in base 2 of π and various other constants can be reduced to a plausible conjecture of chaos theory. See Bailey's above mentioned web site for details.
It is also unknown whether π and e are algebraically independent. However it is known that at least one of πe and π + e is transcendental (q.v.).
For example, consider Coulomb's law (SI units)
and thus eliminate the need for π.
Departing entirely from classical construction, we may mount the given circle on a wheel and roll it along the straight line, unrolling the circumference as we go. The wheel rim is covered with red paint, which is transferred to the road as the wheel travels. As shown by the animation, it travels an unusual, counterintuitive distance before making a full revolution: almost one-seventh again beyond three diameters. This is the number π.]]
Famous numbers | Pi | Transcendental numbers
Pi | باي (رياضيات) | Pi | Пи (математика) | Nombre π | Číslo pí | Pi (tal) | Pi (Kreiszahl) | Pii | Αριθμός π | Número π | Pi (nombro) | Pi (zenbakia) | عدد پی | Pi | Número pi | 원주율 | Pi | Π | Pi greco | פאי | Pi | Numerus pi | Pi | Pi (mattemetik) | Pi | 'पाय' (π) अव्यय राशी | Pi (wiskunde) | 円周率 | Pi | Pi | Pi | Pi | Пи | Pi | Pi | Ludolfovo číslo | Pi | Пи | Pii (vakio) | Pi (tal) | ไพ | Pi | Pi sayısı | Число пі | 圓周率 | 圓周率