An optical illusion characterized by visually perceived images that, at least in common sense terms, are deceptive or misleading. so the information gathered by the eye is processed by the brain to give, on the face of it, a percept that does not tally with a physical measurement of the stimulus source. A conventional assumption is that there are physiological illusions that occur naturally and cognitive illusions that can be demonstrated by specific visual tricks that say something more basic about how human perceptual systems work.
Ambiguous illusions are pictures or objects that elicit a perceptual 'switch' between the alternative interpretations. The Necker cube is a well known example; another instance is the Rubin vase.
Distorting illusions are characterized by distortions of size, length, or curvature. A striking example is the Café wall illusion. Another example is the famous Mueller-Lyer illusion.
Paradox illusions are generated by objects that are paradoxical or impossible, such as the Penrose triangle or impossible staircases seen, for example, in the work of M. C. Escher. The triangle is an illusion dependent on a cognitive misunderstanding that adjacent edges must join.
Fictional illusions are defined as the perception of objects that are genuinely not there to all but a single observer, such as those induced by schizophrenia or hallucinogenic drugs. These are more properly called hallucinations.
Well-known illusions include:
Many famous artists have worked extensively with optical illusions, including M.C. Escher, Salvador Dalí, Giuseppe Arcimboldo, Marcel Duchamp, Oscar Reutersvärd, and Charles Allan Gilbert.Optical illusion is also used in film by the technique of forced perspective.
The explanation of illusions is widely debated. Recent evidence implies that visual illusions are simply the signature of the empirical statistical way all visual percepts are generated. In this interpretation, these phenomena are simply a consequence of the way vision has evolved to solve the inverse problem (see references and links below).
Purves D, Lotto B (2002) Why We See What We Do: An Empirical Theory of Vision. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Purves D, Lotto RB, Nundy S (2002) Why We See What We Do. American Scientist 90 (3): 236-242.
Purves D, Williams MS, Nundy S, Lotto RB (2004) Perceiving the intensity of light. Psychological Rev. Vol. 111: 142-158.
Yang Z, Purves D (2003) A statistical explanation of visual space.Nature Neurosci 6: 632-640.
Optical illusions | Optical phenomena
Optický klam | Synsbedrag | Optische Täuschung | Ilusión óptica | Optika iluzio | Illusion d'optique | 착시 | Sjónvilla | Illusione ottica | אשליה אופטית | Gezichtsbedrog | 錯視 | Ilusão de óptica | Optinen harha | Optisk illusion | Ảo ảnh (quang học) | 错视
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Optical illusion".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world