In the development of Internet Art, defined by art projects which are "materializations of social networks about communication, about the Internet" (Lev Manovich, "Internet, modernisation and net.art" *),net.art (with a dot and a small 'n') is a particular moment. net.art is less a category than a movement, less a genre than a critical and political landmark in Internet Art history.
Lev Manovich at the same time disparaged the Internet as a Totalitarian medium in his text from 1996 ON TOTALITARIAN INTERACTIVITY in which he makes the personal statement: "I cannot but see Internet as a communal apartment of Stalin era: no privacy, everybody spies on everybody else, always present line for common areas such as the toilet or the kitchen. Or I can think of it as a giant garbage site for the information society, with everybody dumping their used products of intellectual labor and nobody cleaning up."
"net.art" is an expression that was coined by Pit Schultz (one of the founders of the Nettime mailing list) sometime in 1995, but is generally attributed to Vuk Cosic through Alexei Shulgin. It was forged after coming across "conjoined phrases in an email bungled by a technical glitch (a morass of alphanumeric junk, its only legible term 'net.art')" (Rachel Greene, Internet Art, Thames & Hudson Ltd, London, 2004). It was first used on the occasion of the "net.art per se" series, a meeting of artists and theorists in Trieste, Italy in May 1996, to point to a group of people who worked closely in the first half of the 1990s (and into the 2000s) . These meetings gave birth to the online website net.art per se/CNN Interactive *, which is a fake CNN website commemorating the event. Rachel Greene sums up the core ideas discussed at this meeting, ideas that were to become the basis for the works related to net.art: "a serious engagement with popular media, a belief in parody and appropriation, a skepticism towards commodified media information and a sense of the interplay of art and life."
The birth of net.art as a geographically and historically defined movement is usually related to the creation of the Electronic Photogallery by Alexei Shulgin in 1994, which evolved into the Moscow wwwartcentre [http://sunsite.cs.msu.su/wwwart/index1.htm, as initiated by Alexei Shulgin, Tania Detkina, Alexander Nikolaev and Rachel Baker.
net.artists have defined themselves through an international and network mode of communication, an interplay of exchanges, collaborative and cooperative work. They have a massive presence on several mailing lists such as Nettime (see their archives with Olia Lialina and Alexei Shulgin) and Eyebeam *)
net.artists like Jodi developed a particular form of e-mail art, or spam mail art, through text reprocessing and ASCII art interventions: a list of all their actions on the Eybeam mailing list for the year 1998 can be found here. The term "spam art" was coined by Frederic Madre to describe all such forms of disruptive interventions in mailing-lists. A bridge can be made to the e-mail interventions of "Codeworks" artists such as Mez or mi-ga. ("Codeworks" is a term coined by poietician Alan Sondheim to define the textual experiments of artists playing with faux-code and non-executable script or mark-up languages).
By questioning structures such as the navigation window (or dialog boxes) and challenging their functionality, net.artists have shown that what is considered to be natural by most Internet users is actually highly constructed, even controlled, by corporations. Company browsers like Netscape Navigator or Internet Explorer display user-friendly structures (the "navigation", the "exploration" are landmarks of our social practices) to provide the user with a familiar environment. Net.artists try to break this familiarity. An early experiment in that field is the "BlahBlah" search Olia Lialina, in My Boyfriend Came Back from the War Jodi, with their series of pop-up interventions and browser crashing applets, have engaged the materiality of navigation in their work. Their experiments have given birth to what could be called "browser art", which has been expanded by the British collective I/O/D's experimental navigator WebStalker [http://bak.spc.org/iod/" target="_blank" >*, to choose one example among many.
Alexei Shulgin (Link X 1996) and Heath Bunting (_readme or Own, Be Owned, or Remain Invisible [http://irational.org/heath/_readme.html, 1996) have played with the structure of advertisement portals by establishing lists of keywords unlikely to be searched for but nonetheless existing on the web as URLs or metadata components: they use this relational data to enmesh paths of navigation in order to create new readable texts. The user (and especially the art-interested user that is likely to be the first audience) is not exploring one art website that has its own meaning and aesthetic significance within itself, but rather they are opened up to the entire network as a collection of socio-economic forces and political stances that are not always visible.
Rachel Greene has associated net.art with Tactical media as a form of Detournement. She writes: "The subversion of corporate websites shares a blurry border with hacking and agitprop practices that would become an important field of net art, often referred to as 'tactical media'."
In this perspective, the duo 0100101110101101.org Christophe Bruno (The Google Ad Word Happening * have emerged among others as a new generation of Internet artists with goals closely connected to those of the early net.artists.
"We can point to a superficial difference between most net.art and hacking: hackers have an obsession with getting inside other computer systems and having an agency there, whereas the 404 errors in the JTDDS (for example) only engage other systems in an intentionally wrong manner in order to store a 'secret' message in their error logs. It's nice to think of artists as hackers who endeavour to get inside cultural systems and make them do things they were never intended to do: artists as culture hackers." (Brett Stalbaum, http://www.thing.net/eyebeam/msg00527.html)
Some projects, such as Joachim Schmid's Archiv Hybrids or Copies by 0100101110101101.org * on 1997.
Olia Lialina has confronted the issue of digital curating. In 1998 she set up the web platform Teleportacia.org , an online gallery of promotion and selling of net.art works. Each piece of net.art has its originality protected by a guarantee constituted by the web address of its location (the URL), presented as a barrier against reproducibility and/or forgery. Lialina claimed that this allowed the buyer of the piece to own it as they wished: controlling the location address as a means of controlling access to the piece. This attempt at giving net.art an economic identity and a legitimation within the art world was critically questioned, even within the net.art sphere, though the project was often understood as a satire (see "Net Art Market: What Happens Next?" Teleportacia.org *" target="_blank" >collective, who, under the pseudonym of "Luther Bissett", cloned the content of Teleportacia.org in 1999 and came up with an unauthorized mirror-site, showing the net.art works in the same context (the clone of Teleportacia.org) and the same quality as the original. The Last Real Net Art Museum [http://myboyfriendcamebackfromth.ewar.ru/ is another example of Olia Lialina's attempt to deal with the issue.
"There is no Genius isolated from the world and inspired by the Muse – culture is made by people exchanging information and re-working on what has been already done in the past, it has always been like that." (‘Luther Blissett’, 0100101110101101.org : art.hacktivism)
A story of net.art *
Baumgärtel, T. "The Materiality Test" *
Nathan Castle, "Art.com, Internet Art and Radicalism in the New Digital Economy" *
Olia Lialina, interviewed by Tilman Baumgärtel: "Internet Art Haute Couture. The Price of Art" *
Vuk Cosic, interviewed by We-Make-Money-Not-Art *
Frederic Madre, interviewed by Josephine Bosma *