In mathematics, a morphism is an abstraction of a structure-preserving mapping between two mathematical structures.
The most common example occurs when the process is a function or map which preserves the structure in some sense. In set theory, for example, morphisms are just functions; in group theory they are group homomorphisms; while in topology they are continuous functions. In the context of universal algebra morphisms are generically known as homomorphisms.
The abstract study of morphisms and the structures (or objects) between which they are defined forms part of category theory. In category theory, morphisms need not be functions at all and are usually thought as arrows between two different objects (which need not be sets). Rather than mapping elements of one set to another they simply represent some sort of relationship between the domain and codomain.
Despite the abstract nature of morphisms, most people's intuition about them (and indeed much of the terminology) comes from the case of concrete categories where the objects are simply sets with some additional structure and morphisms are functions preserving this structure.
A category C is given by two pieces of data: a class of objects and a class of morphisms.
There are two operations defined on every morphism, the domain (or source) and the codomain (or target).
Morphisms are often depicted as arrows from their domain to their codomain, e.g. if a morphism f has domain X and codomain Y, it is denoted f : X → Y. The set of all morphisms from X to Y is denoted homC(X,Y) or simply hom(X, Y) and called the hom-set between X and Y. (Some authors write MorC(X,Y) or Mor(X, Y)).
For every three objects X, Y, and Z, there exists a binary operation hom(X, Y) × hom(Y, Z) → hom(X, Z) called composition. The composite of f : X → Y and g : Y → Z is written or gf (Some authors write it as fg.) Composition of morphisms is often denoted by means of a commutative diagram. For example,
Morphisms must satisfy two axioms:
When C is a concrete category, composition is just ordinary composition of functions, the identity morphism is just the identity function, and associativity is automatic. (Functional composition is associative.)
Note that the domain and codomain are really part of the information determining the morphism. For example, in the category of sets, where morphisms are functions, two functions may be identical as sets of ordered pairs (having the same range), but have different codomains. These functions are considered distinct for the purposes of category theory. For this reason, many authors require that the hom-classes hom(X, Y) be disjoint. In practice, this is not a problem, because if they are not disjoint, the domain and codomain can be appended to the morphisms, (say, as the second and third components of an ordered triple), making them disjoint.
Note that if a split monomorphism f has a left-inverse g, then g is a split epimorphism and has right-inverse f.
Note that every isomorphism is a bimorphism but, in general, not every bimorphism is an isomorphism. For example, in the category of commutative rings the inclusion Z → Q is a bimorphism which is not an isomorphism. However, any morphism that is both an epimorphism and a split monomorphism, or both a monomorphism and a split epimorphism, must be an isomorphism. A category in which every bimorphism is an isomorphism is a balanced category. For example, Set is a balanced category.
See also:
For more examples see the article on category theory.
Morphismus | Morfismo | Morphisme | Morfismo | 射 (圏論) | Morfism | 态射
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Morphism".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world