Holism in science, or Holistic science, is a controversial approach to research that emphasizes the study of complex systems under the guise of science. Not a scientific discipline itself, it defines a philosophical lens by which emergence is taken into account when applying the scientific method, often within a wider interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary mode of inquiry. This practice is in contrast to a purely analytic tradition (sometimes called reductionism) which proports to understand systems by dividing them into their smallest possible or discernible elements and understanding their elemental properties alone. The holism/reductionism dichotomy is often evident in conflicting interpretations of experimental findings and in setting priorities for future research.
Features considered central to the holistic approach
The term
holistic science has been used as a category encompassing a number of scientific research fields (see some examples below). The term may not have a precise definition. Fields of scientific research considered potentially holistic do however have certain things in common.
First, they are multidisciplinary. Second, they are concerned with the behavior of complex systems. Third, they recognize feedback within systems as a crucial element for understanding their behavior.
The Santa Fe Institute, a center of holistic scientific research in the United States, expresses it like this:
- The two dominant characteristics of the SFI research style are commitment to a multidisciplinary approach and an emphasis on the study of problems that involve complex interactions among their constituent parts.
An alternative to reductionism
Some advocates of
holism refer to orthodox science as
reductionist science or the
reductionist paradigm or
greedy reductionism. This is a compact way to allude to a tendency of classical science towards the
modular: that is, to break systems down into manageable parts for study.
The holistic premise is that there is a possible qualitative difference between an entire system and its parts: that modularisation may fail. As applied to science, holists may generally assert that this difference can warrant the kind of rigorous scrutiny typical of scientific inquiry. The distinction of approach then lies not so much in the subjects chosen for study, but in the methods and assumptions used to study them. For example, in the field of quantum physics, David Bohm pointed out that there is no scientific evidence to support the dominant view that the universe consists of a huge, finite number of minute particles, and offered in its stead a view of undivided wholeness.
Though considered by some as alternative, holistic methods are not generally at odds with the classical scientific method. Where holistic scientists come from a standard science background, holistic work in science tends to be, to varying degrees, a marriage of the two approaches. For example gestalt psychology grew out of early experimental psychology. When the terms are used constructively in the science context, holism and reductionism refer to how empirical evidence is interpreted, and not only to the methods used to produce such evidence.
Examples of holism in various scientific fields
Many scientific disciplines are affected by the holistic paradigm. Some of these are widely accepted parts of mainstream
science, while others are variously considered to be
protoscientific or even
pseudoscientific.
Quantum physics
Physicist
David Bohm put forward an
interpretation of
quantum theory that reconciles it with an idea of the universe as an undivided whole, any division of which (e.g. into observer and observed) can only be arbitrary. Despite its elegant simplicity and distinct advantages, this holistic interpretation was given at best an ambivalent reception by mainstream scientists. Recently, however (from the 1990s to the present) Bohm's reputation in the field of quantum physics has grown, though many of his holistic ideas remain in dispute.
*
Systems biology and systems ecology
Fledgling transdisciplines which apply holistic approaches to the study of
biology and
ecology to gain insights into the functioning of entire biological and ecological systems (i.e. plants, animals, organisms). See
Systems biology and
Systems ecology articles for more information.
System dynamics modelling
In
system dynamics modeling, a field that originated at
MIT, a holistic controlling paradigm organizes scientific method, but uses the results of reductionist science to define static relationships between variables in a modeling procedure that permits simulation of the dynamics of the system under study. As mentioned above,
feedback is a crucial tool for understanding system dynamics.
*
Complexity theory
Another area of intense holistic scientific research is
complexity theory. Research in this area began in 1984 with the establishment of the
Santa Fe Institute by physicist
Murray Gell-Mann, and this institute remains a driving force in the field.
Cognitive science
The field of
cognitive science, or the study of mind and intelligence has some examples for holistic approaches. These include
Unified Theory of Cognition (
Allen Newell, e.g.
Soar,
ACT-R as
models) and many others, many of which rely on the concept of
emergence, i.e. the interplay of many entities make up a functioning whole. Another example is
psychological nativism, the study of the innate structure of the mind.
Non-holistic functionalist approaches within cognitive science include e.g. the
modularity of mind paradigm.
Cognitive science need not concern only human cognition. Biologist Marc Bekoff has done holistic, interdisciplinary scientific research in animal cognition and has published a book about it (see below).
Neural networks and artificial intelligence
Another category of holistic research consists of attempts to simulate the human brain or build systems that function along the same lines as the human brain. The field as a whole is called
artificial intelligence and the subfield
neural networks in particular can be considered holistic, as it is based on the assumption that connections and
feedback between simple nodes arranged in a system, or network, can give rise to behavior similar to intelligent or cognition-based behavior.
Integral theory
Not a scientific field in itself, and
interdisciplinary by definition,
integral theory is the pursuit of knowledge through a combination of scientific and spiritual approaches. The fundamental proposition of integral theory is that both
science and
spirituality are legitimate domains of human experience and are both essential to an understanding of the world. Mainstream scientists, by contrast, when interpreting scientific findings typically subordinate, ignore, or deny spiritual experience. Integral theorists believe that their new approach will open new avenues of scientific inquiry in the future. Prominent integral theorists include
Jean Gebser,
Teilhard de Chardin, and the contemporary thinker
Ken Wilber.
Medicine
In addition to the wealth of
complementary and alternative approachs to medicine, many of which are viewed with suspicion or even outright hostility by the mainstream medical community,
orthomolecular medicine and
orthomolecular psychiatry, pioneered by noted physicist and peace activist
Linus Pauling, represent an alternative approach to medicine that makes greater use of laboratory testing to vary the concentration of substances normally present in the body to prevent and treat disease.
Other examples
- Ecology, or ecological science, i.e. studying the ecology at levels ranging from populations, communities, and ecosystems up to the biosphere as a whole.
- The study of climate change can be considered holistic science, as the climate (and the Earth itself) constitutes a complex system to which the scientific method cannot be applied using current technology.
- Princeton University hosts a holistic science project entitled "Global Consciousness Project" that uses a network of physical random number generators to register events of global signficance, testing the hypothesis that there is a collective human consciousness at work in the world. *
- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's 1810 book Zur Farbenlehre (Theory of Colors) not only parted radically with the dominant Newtonian optical theories of his time, but also with the entire Enlightenment methodology of reductive science. Although the theory was not received well by scientists, Goethe — considered one of the most important intellectual figures in modern Europe — thought of his color theory as his greatest accomplishment. Holistic theorists and scientists such as Rupert Sheldrake still refer to the Goethe's color-theory as an inspiring example of holistic science. The introduction to the book lays out Goethe's unique philosophy of science.
- Another example of how holistic and reductionist science can be mutually supportive and cooperative is free choice profiling.
Writers on holistic science
A text often referred to by writers on holistic science (and by all who recognize the existence of scientific
paradigms) is
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by
Thomas Kuhn. While this book does not address holistic science directly, it is relevant because, in it Kuhn originally coined the term "scientific paradigm" and introduced the concept of opposing, or even warring, paradigms in science.
The following have written influential books which treat non-reductionist or holistic science:
- Teilhard de Chardin (1881-1955), French paleontologist, biologist, philosopher
- David Bohm (1917-1992), American quantum physicist
- Francisco Varela (1946-2001), Chilean biologist
- Rupert Sheldrake, biologist and prolific author
- Mae-Wan Ho, biologist
- Stephen Wolfram, author of A New Kind of Science
- Eric Margolis of Rice University, co-author of Concepts: Core Readings (with Stephen Laurence of the University of Sheffield)
- Ken Wilber, American philosopher, psychologist and author of The Marriage of Sense and Soul: Integrating Science and Religion
- Fred Alan Wolf, American physicist, author of Taking the Quantum Leap
- Marc Bekoff, American biologist and cognitive ethologist, author of Species of Mind (with philosopher Colin Allen)
- F. David Peat, physicist and writer, founder of the Pari Center for New Learning
- Murray Gell-Mann, physicist and Nobel laureate, wrote The Quark and the Jaguar, Adventures in the Simple and the Complex on complexity
- Henri Bortoft, physicist who did postgraduate research on the problem of wholeness in quantum physics with David Bohm, wrote The Wholeness of Nature: Goethe's Way Toward a Science of Conscious Participation in Nature on Goethean science
- Kenneth E. Boulding, economist and system scientist
- Willis Harman, former President of the Institute of Noetic Sciences
- Humberto Maturana, Chilean biologist and philosopher
Holistic science in academe
Perhaps due to the inherent multidisciplinary nature of holistic science, academic institutions have been slow to come forward with degree programs for it. Those that have done so include
Schumacher College in the UK, which offers an MSc degree program in Holistic Science. Several universities have set up centers dedicated to one or more scientific fields where holistic approaches are common. These include the
University of Michigan's
Center for the Study of Complex Systems,
Princeton University's
Global Consciousness Project,
Rice University's
Cognitive Sciences Program, the
London Metropolitan University's
Centre for Postsecular Studies, and the
Hang Seng Centre for Cognitive Studies in
Sheffield.
There are also several non-university academic institutions and societies that are dedicated to holistic science or open to holistic ideas. For example, Santa Fe Institute (a major center of holistic scientific research in the U.S.), the Scientific and Medical Network (in Europe), the Pari Center for New Learning (in Italy), and the System Dynamics Society in Albany, New York. The VERITAS Research Program, affiliated with the University of Arizona, uses holistic approaches to test the existence of an afterlife. There is also the Institute of Noetic Sciences in Petaluma, California. Brazil has its Willis Harman House in São Paulo.
Opposing views
Holistic science is
controversial. One opposing view is that holistic science is "
pseudoscience" because it does not rigorously follow the
scientific method despite the use of a scientifically-sounding language.
Science journalist John Horgan has expressed this view in the book, The End of Science 1996. He wrote that a certain pervasive model within holistic science, self-organized criticality, for example, "is not really a theory at all. Like punctuated equilibrium, self-organized criticality is merely a description, one of many, of the random fluctuations, the noise, permeating nature." By the theorists' own admissions, he said, such a model "can generate neither specific predictions about nature nor meaningful insights. What good is it, then?"
Bibliography
- Paul Davies and John Gribbin. The Matter Myth: Dramatic Discoveries That Challenge Our Understanding of Physical Reality, 1992, Simon & Schuster, ISBN 0671728415
- Henri Bortoft. The Wholeness of Nature: Goethe's Way Toward a Science of Participation in Nature, 1996, Lindisfarne Books, ISBN 0940262797
- Humberto R. Maturana and Francisco Varela. The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, 1992, Shambhala, ISBN 0877736421
- Article "What is the Proper Relationship of Holistic and Reductionist Science?" by Karl North
- Article "The Fine Line: (W)holism and Science" by Annemarie Colbin, Ph.D.
- Article "A New Image of Cosmos & Anthropos: From Ancient Wisdom to a Philosophy of Wholeness" by Michael R. Meyer
- Excerpts from Holistic Science - towards a second Renaissance by R.J.C. Wilding (unpublished book in process)
- Article "Concerning the Spiritual in Art and Science" by Mike King (available on-line)
- Article "Patterns of Wholeness: Introducing Holistic Science" by Brian Goodwin, from the journal Resurgence
- Article "From Control to Participation" by Brian Goodwin, from the journal Resurgence
- System Dynamics Resource Page at Arizona State University, hosted by Craig W. Kirkwood
- Introduction to Goethe's Way of Science: A Phenomenology of Nature, edited by David Seamon and Arthur Zajonc. State University of New York Press, 1998
See also
Articles related to holism
Articles related to the classification of scientific endeavors
External links
References
- 1 Olival Freire Jr., Science and exile: David Bohm, the hot times of the Cold War, and his struggle for a new interpretation of quantum mechanics (Online article)
- 2 Definition of System Dynamics and Systems Thinking on System Dynamics Society homepage
Holism | Interdisciplinary fields | Systems theory | Cognitive science
scienza olistica