A fire extinguisher is an active fire protection device to put out fires, often in emergency situations. Fire extinguishers consist of pressurised containers of chemicals that, when discharged, can put out fires. It is important for users to familiarise themselves with the use of fire extinguishers in their vicinity, as improper or untimely use, contrary to bounding, may be counterproductive.
The first version of the modern fire extinguisher was invented in the United Kingdom by Captain George William Manby in 1816, consisting of a copper vessel of 3 gallons (13.6 litres) of pearl ash (potassium carbonate) solution under compressed air pressure.
The late 19th century saw the invention of the Soda-Acid extinguisher where a cylinder contained 1 or 2 gallons of water that had sodium bicarbonate mixed in it. Suspended in the cylinder was a vial containing concentrated sulfuric acid. The vial of acid was broken by one of two means depending on the type of extinguisher. One means involved the use of a plunger that broke the acid vial, while the second involved the release of a lead bung that held the vial closed. Once the acid was mixed with the bicarbonate solution, carbon dioxide gas would be expelled and this would in turn pressurize the water. The pressurized water was forced from the canister through a nozzle or short length of hose.
Around 1912 Pyrene pioneered the carbon tetrachloride or CTC extinguisher, where the liquid was expelled from a brass or chrome container by handpump, usually of 1 imperial quart (1.1 L) or 1 imperial pint (0.6 L) capacity but also made in up to 2 imperial gallon (9 L) size, onto a fire. The CTC vapourised and extinguished the flames by chemical reaction. This extinguisher was suitable for liquid and electrical fires and was popular in motor vehicles for the next 60 years. The vapour and combustion by-products were highly toxic and deaths did occur from using these extinguishers in confined spaces.
| Type | pre-1997 | current |
|---|---|---|
| Water | Solid red | |
| Foam | Solid blue | Red with a blue band |
| Powder | Red with a white band | |
| Carbon dioxide | Red with a black band | |
| Vapourising liquid (not halon) | Red with a yellow band | |
| Halon | Solid yellow | — |
| Wet chemical | Solid oatmeal | Red with an oatmeal band |
| Type | pre-1997 | current |
|---|---|---|
| Water | Signal Red | |
| Foam | Cream | Red with a Cream panel above the operating instructions |
| Powder | French Blue | Red with a Blue panel above the operating instructions |
| Carbon Dioxide CO2 | Black | Red with a Black panel above the operating instructions |
| Halon | Emerald Green | No longer produced - illegal in the UK |
| Wet Chemical | Not in use | Red with a Canary Yellow panel above the operating instructions |
| Type | Geometric | Pictogram |
|---|---|---|
| Class A | Green Triangle | Garbage can and wood pile burning |
| Class B | Red Square | Gasoline can with a burning puddle |
| Class C | Blue Circle | Electric plug with a burning outlet |
| Class D | Yellow Star | N/A |
| Class K | Black Hexagon | Pan burning |
A fire extinguisher may emit a solid, liquid, or gaseous chemical.
Most water based extinguishers also contain traces of other chemicals to prevent the extinguisher rusting. Some also contain wetting agents which help the water penetrate deep into the burning material and cling better to steep surfaces.
Water may or may not help extinguishing class B fires. It depends on whether or not the liquid's molecules are polar molecules. If the liquid that is burning is polar (such as alcohol), there won't be any problem. If the liquid is nonpolar (such as large hydrocarbons, like petroleum), the water will merely spread the flames around.
Similarly, water sprayed on an electrical fire (US: Class C, UK: Class E) will probably cause the operator to receive an electric shock. (However, if the power can be reliably disconnected and a carbon dioxide or halon extinguisher is not available, clean water will actually cause less damage to electrical equipment than will either foam or dry powders). Special spray nozzles, equipped with tiny rotating devices called spiracles will replace the continuous water jet with a succession of droplets, greatly increasing the resistivity of the jet. These shall however be used by skilled personnel, since improper handling of the nozzle may restore continuity of the water jet.
A "protein foam" was used for fire suppression in aviation crashes until the 1960s development of "light water", also known as "Aqueous Film-Forming Foam" (or AFFF). Carbon dioxide (later sodium bicarbonate) extinguishers were used to knock down the flames and foam used to prevent re-ignition of the fuel fumes. "Foaming the runway" can reduce friction and sparks in a crash landing, and protein foam continued to be used for that purpose, although FAA regulations prohibited reliance upon its use for suppression.
BC Powder has a slight saponification effect on cooking oils & fats due to its alkalinity & sometimes used to be specified for kitchens prior to the invention of Wet Chemical extinguishers. Where an extremely fast knockdown is required potassium bicarbonate (Purple K) extinguishers are used. A particular blend also containing urea (Monnex) decrepitates upon exposure to heat increasing the surface area of the powder particles and providing very rapid knockdown.
Both types of powders can also be used on electrical fires, but provide a significant cleanup and corrosion problem that is likely to make the electrical equipment unsalvageable.
Halons are very versatile extinguishers. They will extinguish most types of fire except class D & K/F and are highly effective even at quite low concentrations (less than 5%). Halon is a poor extinguisher for Class A fires, a nine pound Halon extinguisher only receives a 1-A rating and tends to be easily deflected by the wind. They are the only fire extinguishing agents that are quite suitable for discharge in aircraft (as other materials pose a corrosion hazard to the aircraft). The major extinguishing effect is by disturbing the thermal balance of the flame, and to a small extent by inhibiting the chemical reaction of the fire. Halons are chlorofluorocarbons causing damage to the ozone layer and are being phased out for more environmentally-friendly alternatives. Halon fire extinguishers may cost upwards of 800 US dollars due to production and import restrictions.
Halon extinguishers used to be widely used in vehicles and computer suites. It is mildly toxic in confined spaces, but to a far less extent than its predecessors such as carbon tetrachloride, chlorobromomethane and methyl bromide.
Since 1992 the sale and service of Halon extinguishers has been made illegal in Canada except for in a few rare cases.
In the UK and Europe Halons were made illegal at the end of 2003, except for certain specific aircraft and law enforcement uses. This appears to be at least partially in response to the Montreal Protocol and effort by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to combat release of quantities of harmful chemicals into the atmosphere.
Like Halon, phosphorous tribromide is a flame chemistry poison, marketed under the brand name PhostrEx. PhostrEx is a liquid which needs a propellant, such as compressed nitrogen and/or helium, to disperse onto a fire. As a fire extinguisher PhostrEx is much more potent than Halon making it particularly appealing for aviation use as a lightweight substitute. Unlike Halon, PhostrEx reacts quickly with atmospheric moisture to break down into phosphorus acid and hydrogen bromide, neither of which harm the earth's ozone layer.
High concentrations of PhostrEx can cause skin blistering and eye irritation, but since so little is needed to put out flames this problem is not a significant risk, especially in applications where dispersal is confined within an engine compartment. Any skin or eye contact with PhostrEx should be rinsed with ordinary water as soon as practical. PhostrEx is not especially corrosive to metals, although it can tarnish some. The U.S. EPA and FAA both approved PhostrEx, and the substance will find its first major use in Eclipse Aviation's jet aircraft as an engine fire suppression system.
To operate safely and effectively, extinguishers should be subject to regular maintenance by a competent person and most countries in the world require this maintenance as part of fire safety legislation.
Lack of maintenance can lead to an extinguisher not discharging when required, or worse still, rupturing when pressurised. Deaths have occurred, even in recent times, from corroded extinguishers exploding.
There is no all-encompassing fire code in the United States. Generally, most municipalities (by adoption of the International Fire Code) require inspections every 30 days to ensure the unit is pressurized and unobstructed (done by an employee of the facility) and an annual inspection by a qualified technician. Also, a 5 yearly hydraulic pressure testing for all types of extinguisher is required. Through electronic monitoring of fire extinguishers the 30 day inspection can be eliminated.
In the UK, three types of maintenance are required:
Firefighting equipment | Fire suppression | Safety
Hasicí přístroj | Feuerlöscher | Extintor | Extincteur | 소화기 | Estintore | Brandblusser | 消火器 | Gaśnica | Brandsläckare | 滅火器
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Fire extinguisher".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world