In mathematics, the permutations of a finite set (i.e. the bijective mappings from the set to itself) fall into two equal classes: the even permutations and the odd permutations. An even permutation is one that can be produced by an even number of exchanges of two elements (these exchanges are called transpositions). An odd permutation is one that can be produced by an odd number of transpositions. It is a remarkable and non-trivial fact that every permutation is either even or odd, but not both.
The sign or signature of a permutation, with the notation sgn(σ), is defined as +1 if the permutation is even and -1 if it is odd. Another notation for it is the Levi-Civita symbol, which is also defined for non-bijective maps from the finite set to itself, with the value zero.
The following rules follow directly from the corresponding rules about addition of integers:
Considering the symmetric group Sn of all permutations of the set {1,...,n}, we can conclude that the map
Furthermore, we see that the even permutations form a subgroup of Sn. This is the alternating group on n letters, denoted by An. It is the kernel of the homomorphism sgn. The odd permutations cannot form a subgroup, since the composite of two odd permutations is even, but they form a coset of An (in Sn).
If n>1, then there are just as many even permutations in Sn as there odd ones; consequently, An contains n!/2 permutations. reason: if σ is even, then (12)σ is odd; if σ is odd, then (12)σ is even; the two maps are inverse to each other.
A cycle is even if and only if its length is odd. This follows from formulas like
Every permutation of odd order must be even; the converse is not true in general.
Every permutation can be produced by a sequence of transpositions: with the first transposition we put the first element of the permutation in its proper place, the second transposition puts the second element right etc. Given a permutation σ, we can write it as a product of transpositions in many different ways. We want to show that either all of those descompositions have an even number of transpositions, or all have an even number.
Suppose we have two such descompositions:
Every transposition can be written as a product of an odd number of transpositions of adjacent elements, e.g.
We define an inversion pair for σ to be a pair of indices (i,j) such that i<j and σ(i)>σ(j). Let N(σ) be the number of inversion pairs of σ.
Now compose the inverse of T1 with sigma. T1 is the transposition (i, i+1) of two adjacent numbers, so, compared to σ, the new permutation σ(i, i+1) will have exactly one inversion pair less (in case (i,i+1) was an inversion pair for σ) or more (in case (i, i+1) was not an inversion pair). Then apply the inverses of T2, T3, ... Tk in the same way, "unraveling" the permutation σ. At the end we get the identity permutation, whose N is zero. This means that the original N(σ) less k is even.
We can do the same thing with the other decomposition, Q1... Qm, and it will turn out that the original N(σ) less k is even.
Therefore, m - k is even, as we wanted to show.
We can now define the transposition σ to be even if N(σ) is an even number, and odd if N(σ) is odd. This coincides with the definition given earlier but it is now clear that every permutation is either even or odd.
An alternative proof uses the polynomial
A third approach uses the presentation of the group Sn in terms of generators τ1,...,τn-1 and relations
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Even and odd permutations".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world