This article is about the legal term. For the book by Tom Clancy, see Clear and Present Danger. For the 1994 film, see Clear and Present Danger (film).

Clear and present danger is a term used in the case Schenck v. United States, , a U.S. Supreme Court opinion concerning speech against the draft during World War I (bold emphasis added):

"The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right."

Following Schenck v. United States, "clear and present danger" became a standard test in cases where a United States law limits free speech; the law is deemed to be constitutional if it can be shown that the language it prohibits is language that poses a "clear and present danger." However, it should be noted that the Schenck decision was later overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio, and the test refined to determining whether the speech would provoke an imminent lawless action.

Research Resources

• First Amendment Library entry on Schenck v. United States
• First Amendment Library entry on Famous First Amendment Phrases: Origins

See also

• shouting fire in a crowded theater

Freedom of expression | United States law

明白かつ現在の危険