In mathematics, the cardinality of a set is a measure of the "number of elements of the set". There are two approaches to cardinality – one which compares sets directly using bijections, injections, and surjections, and another which uses cardinal numbers.
We say that a set A has cardinality greater than or equal to the cardinality of B (and B has cardinality less than or equal to the cardinality of A) if there exists an injective function from B into A. We say that A has cardinality strictly greater than the cardinality of B if A has cardinality greater than or equal to the cardinality of B, but A and B do not have the same cardinality, i.e. if there is an injective function from B to A but no bijective function from A to B. For example, the set R of all real numbers has cardinality strictly greater than the cardinality of the set N of all natural numbers, because the inclusion map i : N → R is injective, but it can be shown that there does not exist a bijective function from N to R.
Note that, up until this point, we have only defined the term "cardinality" in a strictly functional role: we have not actually defined the "cardinality" of a set as a specified object itself. We now outline such an approach.
The relation of having the same cardinality is called equinumerosity, and this is an equivalence relation on the class of all sets. The equivalence class of a set A under this relation then consists of all those sets which have the same cardinality as A. There are then two main approaches to the definition of "cardinality of a set":
Cardinality of set is denoted . Cardinality of its power set is denoted .
Cardinalities of the infinite sets are denoted (for each ordinal , is the first cardinality greater than ).
The cardinality of the natural numbers is denoted aleph-null (), while the cardinality of the real numbers is denoted . It can be shown that . (see: Cantor's diagonal argument). The continuum hypothesis states that there is no cardinal number between the cardinality of the reals and the cardinality of the natural numbers, and so .
= {a, b, c}, and set is defined as = {apples, oranges, peaches}, then because they both have three elements.
Such a property allows for the comparison of how many elements are contained in two or more sets without resorting to an intermediate set (viz. the natural numbers).
Proof. Assume there exists such a set, call it . Then let Y be the power set of , , from which the contradiction follows.
Kardinalität | Cardinalité | Fjöldatölur | Cardinalità | Cardinalidade | Mahtavuus | Aleftal | 基数
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Cardinality".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world