| William Shockley | |
|---|---|
| Born : | London, England, February 13, 1910 |
| Died : | Stanford, California, USA, August 12, 1989 |
William Bradford Shockley (February 13, 1910 – August 12, 1989) was a British-born American physicist and co-inventor of the transistor with John Bardeen and Walter Houser Brattain, for which all three were awarded the 1956 Nobel Prize in physics. His attempts to commercialize a new transistor design in the 1950s and 60s led directly to the creation of Silicon Valley. In his later life Shockley was a professor at Stanford, and he also became a foremost advocate of eugenics.
Shockley was named by Time Magazine as one of the 100 most influential people of the 20th century.
Bell Lab attorneys soon discovered that Shockley's field effect principle had been anticipated and patented in 1930 by Julius Lilienfeld. Although the patent appeared breakable, Bell Labs decided it could not risk the chance of its patent being rejected, and therefore based its patent application only on the Bardeen-Brattain design. Shockley's name was not on the resulting patent.
Shockley's diode equation is from this period. William Shockley (1950), Electrons and holes in semiconductors, with applications to transistor electronics During this time Shockley worked out the critical ideas of drift and diffusion and the differential equations that govern the flow of electrons in solid state crystals. He also conceived of the possibility of minority carrier injection that led to his concepts for a sandwich transistor weeks later. This would lead to the junction transistor, invented by Shockley on July 5, 1951. He obtained a patent for this invention.
The ensuing publicity generated by the "invention of the transistor" limelighted Shockley. Shockley was a popular speaker/lecturer and was often consulted by Washington (DC) and the military. This further infuriated and alienated Bardeen and Brattain. Shockley later blocked the two from working on the junction transistor. Bardeen eventually quit, while Brattain refused to work with Shockley further.
His abrasive management style caused him to be passed over for executive promotion at Bell Labs, which felt he was a greater asset as a research scientist and theorist. Shockley wanted the power and profit he felt he deserved. He resigned from Bell Labs in 1953 and moved back to the California Institute of Technology.
"His way" could generally be summed up as "domineering and increasingly paranoid". In one famous incident he claimed that a secretary's cut thumb was an attempt to poison him, and he demanded lie detector tests to find the culprit.* It was later demonstrated the cut was due to a broken thumbtack on the office door, and from that point the research staff was increasingly hostile. Meanwhile his demands to create a new and technically difficult device, now known as the Shockley diode, meant that the project was moving very slowly.
Shockley was a co-recipient of the Nobel Prize in physics in 1956, along with Bardeen and Brattain. A group of about 30 colleagues have met on and off at Stanford since 1956 to reminisce about their time with Shockley and his central role in sparking the information technology revolution, its organizer saying "Shockley is the man who brought silicon to Silicon Valley." *
In late 1957 eight of his researchers, whom he later named "the Traitorous Eight", resigned after Shockley decided not to continue research into silicon-based semiconductors*. The eight started Fairchild Semiconductor after being given seed capital from Fairchild to form a semiconductor division. Among the "Traitorous Eight" were Robert Noyce and Gordon E. Moore, who themselves would leave Fairchild to create Intel. Other offspring companies of Fairchild Semiconductor include National Semiconductor and Advanced Micro Devices. Shockley Semiconductor did not, however, make Shockley a fortune or even turn a profit. While still trying to get his three-state device to work, Fairchild and Texas Instruments both introduced the first integrated circuits, making Shockley's work essentially superfluous.
In his later life, Shockley began giving speeches on population problems, an issue that had interested him since his wartime trips to India. In 1963 he gave a speech at Gustavus Adolphus College in Minnesota suggesting that the people least competent to survive in the world were the ones reproducing the fastest, while the best of the human population was using birth control and having fewer children.
In an interview with U.S. News & World Report in 1963, he "fell into the trap of discussing race," as one biographer writes.* He noted that intelligence research showed a genetic factor in intelligence and that tests for IQ indicate that African Americans have an average IQ 15 points lower than the population average. He was subsequently attacked in the media, for eugenics had become unpopular after its manifestations under the Nazis in WWII. (See also IQ:Genetics vs environment and Race and intelligence)
Shockley believed that the higher rate of reproduction among African Americans was having a "dysgenic" effect, and expressed an interest in eugenics. He thought this work was important to the genetic future of the population, and came to describe it as the most important work of his career, even though it severely tarnished his reputation. Shockley's published writings on this topic, such as in Letters to the Editor of the Palo Alto Times, were largely based on the research of Cyril Burt. Shockley also proposed that individuals with IQs below 100 be paid to undergo voluntary sterilization.
Perhaps it was his beliefs about eugenics that led him to donate sperm to the Repository for Germinal Choice, a sperm bank founded by Robert Klark Graham in hopes of spreading humans' best genes. The bank, called by the media the "Nobel Prize sperm bank," claimed to have three Nobel Prize-winning donors, though Shockley was the only one to come forward publicly. No children were conceived with any of the Nobel Prize sperm. Although some of Shockley's notoriety rubbed off on the sperm bank, at the same time the publicity created a demand for the material. This, together with the zero success rate of the original donors, caused Graham to broaden his criteria to allow for a wider range of donors (younger, taller, and better-looking than what he referred to as the "bald little professor" stereotype of his previous donors). A total of 215 babies were born until the bank's closure. *
American physicists | American eugenicists | American inventors | Nobel Prize in Physics winners | Scientists at Bell Labs | Race and intelligence controversy | IEEE Medal of Honor recipients | National Inventors Hall of Fame | Deaths by prostate cancer | 1910 births | 1989 deaths
William B. Shockley | William Bradford Shockley | William Shockley | 윌리엄 쇼클리 | William Bradford Shockley | William Shockley | William Shockley | ウィリアム・ショックレー | William Shockley | William Shockley | William Bradford Shockley | William Bradford Shockley
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"William Shockley".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world