The "Aphrodite of Milos" otherwise known as the Venus de Milo is an ancient Greek statue and one of the most famous of the art of ancient Greek sculpture. It is believed to depict Aphrodite (called Venus by the Romans), the Greek goddess of love and beauty. It is a marble sculpture, slightly larger than life size at 203 cm (80 inches) high, but without its arms and its original plinth. From an inscription on its now-lost plinth, it is thought to be the work of Alexandros of Antioch; it was earlier mistakenly attributed to the master sculptor Praxiteles.
It is not known exactly what aspect of Venus the statue originally depicted. It is generally thought to have been a representation of Venus Victrix (Aphrodite Victorious) holding the golden apple presented to her by Paris of Troy (see also the Judgement of Paris). This would also have served as a pun on the name of the island Milos, which means "apple" in the Greek language. Two fragments of a left arm and a left hand with an apple were found near the statue in the same niche and are thought to be remnants of its arms. After the statue was found, numerous attempts were made to reconstruct its pose, though it was never restored. (A drawing by Adolf Furtwängler suggesting its original form can be found in an article by KousserKousser, Rachel (2005). Creating the past: the Vénus de Milo and the Hellenistic reception of Classical Greece. American Journal of Archeology 109 (2), 227–250..)
News of the discovery took longer than normal to get to the French ambassador. The peasant grew tired of waiting for payment and was pressured into selling to a local priest, who planned to present the statue as a gift to a translator working for the Sultan in Constantinople (present day Istanbul, Turkish.
The French ambassador's representative arrived just as the statue was being loaded aboard a ship bound for Constantinople and persuaded the islands primates (chief citizens) to annul the sale and honor the first offer.
Upon learning of the reversal of the sale, the translator had the primates whipped and fined, but was eventually reprimanded by the Sultan after the French ambassador complained to him about the mistreatment of the island primates. The primates were reimbursed and ceded all future claims to the statue in gratitude.
Upon arrival at the Louvre, the statue was reassembled but the fragments of the left hand and arm were initially dismissed as being a later restoration due to the rougher workmanship. It is now accepted that the left hand holding the apple and the left arm is in fact original to the statue, but was not as well finished as the rest of the statue since it would have been somewhat above eye level and difficult to see. (This was a standard practice for many sculptors of the era--less visible parts of statues were often not as well finished since they would typically be invisible to the casual observer. Sculptures and statues from this era were normally carved out of several blocks of stone and carefully pieced together. The Venus de Milo turns out to have been carved from at least six to seven blocks of Parian marble: one block for the nude torso, another block for the draped legs, another block apiece for each arm, another small block for the left foot, another block for the inscribed plinth and finally the separately carved herm that stood beside the goddess).
The controversial plinth was initially found to fit perfectly as part of the statue, but after it was translated and dated, the embarrassed experts who had publicized the statue as a possible original work by the artist Praxiteles dismissed it as another later addition to the statue. The inscription read: "...(Alex)andros son of Menides, citizen of Antioch on the Maeander made this (statue)...". The inscribed plinth would have moved the dating of the statue from the Classical Age to the Hellenistic Age because of the style of lettering and the mention of the ancient city of Antioch on the Maeander, which did not exist at the time Praxiteles lived. The Hellenistic Age was at that time was considered a period of decline for Greek art. The plinth mysteriously disappeared shortly before the statue was presented to King Louis XVIII in 1821 and only survives in two drawings and an early description. The king eventually presented the statue to the Louvre museum in Paris, where it still stands on public display.
The statue's great fame in the 19th century was not simply the result of its admitted beauty, but also owed much to a major propaganda effort by the French authorities. In 1815 France had returned the Medici Venus to the Italians after it had been looted from Italy by Napoleon Bonaparte. The Medici Venus, regarded as one of the finest Classical sculptures in existence, caused the French to consciously promote the Venus de Milo as a greater treasure than that which they had recently lost. It was duly praised by artists and critics, who regarded it as the epitome of graceful female beauty; however, Pierre-Auguste Renoir was clearly not following the script when he dismissed it as a "big gendarme".
Although the statue is widely renown for the mystery of its missing arms, enough evidence remains to prove that the right arm was lowered across the torso with the right hand resting on the raised left knee so the sliding drapery wrapped around the hips and legs could be held in place. There is a filled in hole below the right breast that originally contained a metal tenon that would have supported the separately carved right arm.
The left arm was held at just below the eye level of the statue above a herm while holding an apple. The right side of the statue is more carefully worked and finished than the left side or back, indicating that the statue was intended to be seen mainly as a profile from its right. The left hand would have held the apple up into the air further back inside the niche the statue was set in. When the left hand was still attached, to an observer it would have been clear that the goddess was looking at the apple she held up in her left hand.
The statue would have been painted in a riot of colors as the custom of the era, decked out in jewelery and positioned inside a niche inside a gymnasium (ancient Greece). The painting of the statue along with the bedecking in jewelery was intended to make it appear more lifelike. Today, all traces of the painting have disappeared and the only signs of the armbands, necklace, earrings and crown are the attachment holes.
Ancient Greek sculpture | Venus types | Collections of the Louvre
Venus von Milo | Venus de Milo | Melosa Venuso | Vénus de Milo | Venere di Milo | ונוס ממילו | Milói Vénusz | Venus van Milo | ミロのヴィーナス | Wenus z Milo | Vênus de Milo | Венера Милосская | Venus de Milo | Venus från Milo | Tượng thần Vệ Nữ | Венера Мілоська | 断臂维纳斯
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Venus de Milo".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world