In mathematics, the principal square root of a non-negative real number is denoted and represents the non-negative real number whose square (the result of multiplying the number by itself) is
For example, since
This example suggests how square roots can arise when solving quadratic equations such as or, more generally
Per the fundamental theorem of algebra, there are two solutions to the square root of any number (although these roots may not be distinct, as in the square root of zero). For a positive real number, the two square roots are the principal square root and the negative square root. For negative real numbers, the concept of imaginary and complex numbers has been developed to provide a mathematical framework to deal with the results.
Square roots of positive integers are often irrational numbers, i.e., numbers not expressible as a ratio of two integers. For example, cannot be written exactly as m/n, where n and m are integers. Nonetheless, it is exactly the length of the diagonal of a square with side length 1.
The discovery that is irrational is attributed to Hippasus, a disciple of Pythagoras.
The square root symbol () was first used during the 16th century. It has been suggested that it originated as an altered form of lowercase r, representing the Latin radix (meaning "root").
There are numerous methods to compute square roots. See the article on methods of computing square roots.
The square of any positive or negative number is positive, and the square of 0 is 0. Therefore, no negative number can have a real square root. However, it is possible to work in a larger number system, called the complex numbers, in which negative numbers have square roots. This is done by introducing a new number, called the imaginary unit, which is defined to be a square root of -1. It is usually denoted by (sometimes j). Using this notation, the square root of any negative number is
By the argument given above, i can be neither positive nor negative. Thus one drawback of working with complex numbers is that the terms "positive" and "negative" lose their meaning. This creates another problem: we cannot define to be the "positive" square root of .
For every non-zero complex number z there exist precisely two numbers w such that w2 = z. The usual definition of √z is as follows: if is represented in polar coordinates with , then we set . Thus defined, the square root function is holomorphic everywhere except on the non-positive real numbers (where it isn't even continuous). The above Taylor series for remains valid for complex numbers x with |x| < 1.
When the number is in rectangular form the following formula can be used:
where the sign of the imaginary part of the root is the same as the sign of the imaginary part of the original number.
Note that because of the discontinuous nature of the square root function in the complex plane, the law is in general not true. Wrongly assuming this law underlies several faulty "proofs", for instance the following one showing that -1 = 1:
The third equality cannot be justified. (See invalid proof.)
However the law can only be wrong by a factor -1 (it is right up to a factor -1), √(zw) = ±√(z)√(w), is true for either ± as + or as -. Note that √(c2) = ±c, therefore √(a2b2) = ±ab and therefore √(zw) = ±√(z)√(w), using a = √(z) and b = √(w).
If A is a positive-definite matrix or operator, then there exists precisely one positive definite matrix or operator B with B2 = A; we then define √A = B.
More generally, to every normal matrix or operator A there exist normal operators B such that B2 = A. In general, there are several such operators B for every A and the square root function cannot be defined for normal operators in a satisfactory manner. Positive definite operators are akin to positive real numbers, and normal operators are akin to complex numbers.
Under certain conditions infinitely nested radicals such as
represent rational numbers. This rational number can be found by realizing that x also appears under the radical sign, which gives the equation
If we solve this equation, we find that x = 2. More generally, we find that
Beware, however, of the discontinuity for n=0. The infinitely nested square root for n=0 does not equal one, as the "general" solution would indicate. Rather, it is (obviously) zero.
The same procedure also works to get
This method will give a rational value for all values of such that
The construction is also given by Descartes in his La Géométrie, see figure 2 on page 2. However, Descartes made no claim to originality and his audience would have been quite familiar with Euclid.
In Ancient India, the knowledge of theoretical and applied aspects of square and square root was at least as old as Sulba Sutras, dated around 800-500 B.C. (possibly much earlier). A method for finding very good approximations to the square roots of 2 and 3 are given in Boudhayana Sulba Sutra Joseph (1991), Crest of the Peacock: ch.8. Aryabhata in Aryabhatiya (section 2.4) has given a method for finding out square root of numbers having many digits.
Smith D.E. in History of Mathematics (book 2, p.148) says thus about the existing situation in Europe: "In Europe these methods (for finding out the square and square root) did not appear before Cataneo (1546). He gave the method of Aryabhata for determing the square root".
Funció arrel | Odmocnina | Kvadratrod | Quadratwurzel | Raíz cuadrada | Racine carrée | Raíz cadrada | שורש (מתמטיקה) | 제곱근 | Ferningsrót | Radice quadrata | Vierkantswortel | 平方根 | Kvadratrot | Pierwiastek kwadratowy | Raiz quadrada | Square root | Квадратни корен | Akar kuadrat | Neliöjuuri | Kvadratrot | 平方根
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Square root".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world