Science for the People is a left-wing organization, magazine, and movement which emerged from the antiwar culture of the 1970s. It was composed of professors, students, workers, and concerned citizens, who sought to end any potential oppression brought on by pseudoscience, or the misuse of science. It was founded in part by the Sociobiology Study Group (based in Cambridge, Massachusetts), which included members Richard Lewontin, Stephen Jay Gould, Jonathan Beckwith, Ruth Hubbard, and Richard Levins. Science for the People generated much controversy in the 1970s for the radical tactics of some of its members. Herb Fox, one of its founding members, wrote:

"I was a founder in 1969-70 of Science for the People. It originated in the coming together of the then one-year old Scientists and Engineers for Social and Political Action (SESPA) and a group of Harvard and MIT students who had been invited to participate in a session of the AAAS annual meeting. SESPA itself was formed in the aftermath of a struggle in the American Physical Society lead by Charlie Schwartz and Martin Perl and others to get the APS to take a stand against the Vietnam war. SftP's disruptive tactics at the AAAS meeting and at many scientific meetings thereafter increased its exposure and the participation of the younger and more militant anong scientists and science students. The first issue of Science for the People (1970) was produced and edited by me with a comrade who is now my wife. Subsequent issues were produced by ever changing editorial collectives. Over its first few years differing views arose on what SftP should be. One group wanted Science for the People to assume a supportive role in the class struggle with special attention to the issues of science. Another group wanted to work towards "A Science for the People." Most wanted to be the voice of critical consciousness from within the scientific community exposing science against the people and the dangers of the misuse of science. The struggle was painful and disruptive and not carried on with great clarity. Eventually those who were more interested in third world and workers struggles etc. than in science itself left the organization. Over the ensuing years the organization became primarily identified with its magazine which became an outlet for critical discussion of the misuse of science. In the process it became identified with well known critical academic scientists such as Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Lewontin."^*

External links

• Science for the People - official website
• Science for the People Discussion List
• "Towards A Science For The People" - theoretical outline
• "Science and Ideology" - critical essay by Edward O. Wilson