Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) is a special-purpose district responsible for public transit services, congestion management, specific highway improvement projects, and countywide transportation planning for Santa Clara County, California, United States.
On September 26, 1974, the county Board of Supervisors dissolved the Public Works Department.McCaleb, 16. Non-transit operations went into a new General Services Agency, while transit operations were placed into a new Santa Clara County Transportation Agency.McCaleb, 16.
The biggest problem facing SCCTD in its early years was to replace the aging bus fleet it inherited from its predecessors. At first the district bought propane-fueled Twin Coaches from Gillig, but switched to an all-diesel fleet when six buses went up in flames between December 1977 and April 1978.McCaleb, 26. At the time, critics referred to the buses as "rolling propane bombs."McCaleb, 26.
On January 1, 1995, the SCCTA merged with the county Congestion Management Agency to become the SCVTA. For convenience, the acronym was later shortened to VTA.
In 1996, voters approved a half cent sales tax, Measure B, and a companion list of projects recommended to be funded with Measure B, called (1996) Measure A. The two measures were designed to circumvent the rule in the California State Constitution that requires a two-thirds supermajority to pass any special purpose sales tax, but only a majority vote to pass a general sales tax. The measure was challenged, but in 1998, the California Supreme Court ruled that the two measure system was valid. * The tax was to be collected for ten years.
In 2000, voters approved an extension of the sales tax to fund an extension of Bay Area Rapid Transit to Santa Clara. 2000 Measure A also funded light rail extensions, highway construction, and bus service expansion, as well as a people mover to San Jose International Airport. The sales tax will be extended to 2036. The measure was criticized by residents in the western and southern portions of the county, who stated that not enough benefit was being provided to those areas. Nevertheless, due to growing congestion as a result of the dot-com boom, the measure passed overwhelmingly, with 70% of the vote.
However, due to the dot-com bust, revenues failed to materialize and VTA was forced to cut service and increase fares. VTA embarked on a series of fare hikes starting in 1998 and culminating in 2005. Base fares have increased 59%, monthly passes by 86%, and day passes by 139% over that time. VTA's farebox recovery is approximately 12%, which is far below the national average. Attempts to increase VTA's low farebox recovery has resulted in fare increases and service cuts, which continue to reduce ridership and paradoxically do not result in major improvement in farebox recovery. Thus, it is often said that VTA is in a "death spiral" of high fares and poor service. bankruptcy in 2003 [http://www.gilroydispatch.com/news/contentview.asp?c=37808" target="_blank" >* as a result of expenses that exceeded revenues.
VTA received another blow to its plans to extend BART when the Federal Transit Administration issued a "Not Recommended" rating in January 2004. * The FTA was concerned about the ability for VTA to raise matching funds for construction, and of its ability to operate BART and other bus services at the same time. Nevertheless, VTA continued to design BART and prepare the required Environmental Impact Statement.
In 2006, VTA and county social service agencies jointly proposed an additional half cent sales tax increase, 2006 Measure A, which would provide some money for unspecified transportation projects. The tax increase would have meant that Santa Clara County would have the highest sales tax in the state. Recent California Supreme Court decisions had prevented the VTA from using the same technique as in 1996, so the amount of money going to each program was not stated. However, the measure was portrayed in the public as the last means of saving the BART extension. The measure failed the voters by a margin of 58% opposed and 42% in favor. VTA's plans still include the BART extension, but the agency is still short $3 billion for its overall transportation plan. *
In June 2004, the Santa Clara County Grand Jury criticized the governance strucutre by calling it "too large, too political, too dependent on staff, too inexperienced in some cases, and too removed from the financial and operational performance of VTA." Since VTA board members are required to be elected officials, they must juggle their other duties in addition to VTA. The Grand Jury recommended that the VTA board be shrunk to 5 to 7 members, with members either appointed solely for transportation issues or directly elected by the voters. *
VTA's current General Manager is Michael Burns, previously the General Manager of San Francisco Muni.
The VTA light rail system consists of 42 miles of track, currently consisting of two main lines and a spur line. There are currently 62 light rail stations in operation on the three lines. The light rail system was opened in 1987 and has gradually expanded since then.
VTA's longest and most-used bus route is Line 22, which connects Eastridge Shopping Center in East San Jose with the Caltrain stations in Palo Alto and Menlo Park via El Camino Real. These locations serve as transfer points for SamTrans buses from San Mateo County. Line 22 is the only line with 24-hour, 7 days-per-week service, including night bus service as part of the regional All-Nighter Network. One side effect of Line 22's 24-hour schedule is that it doubles as a moving homeless shelter.Jane Lii, "Refuge On The Road: Homeless Find Nighttime Haven — The No. 22 Bus From Menlo Park To San Jose," San Jose Mercury News, 9 January 2000, 1A.Cathy Newman, "Silicon Valley: Inside the Dream Incubator," National Geographic 200, no. 6 (December 2001): 52-76. Line 22's fleet of coaches primarily consists of articulated low floor New Flyer buses. Line 22, and Rapid Line 522 are currently the only routes that utilize the low-floor articulated New Flyer models.
On July 5, 2005, VTA implemented its first rapid bus line along the VTA's busiest corridor. Modeled after the Metro Rapid service in Los Angeles, rapid bus Line 522 follows most of the Line 22 route, and features limited stops, headway based schedules, low floor fleet, and signal priority along El Camino Real.
.
Mass transit in California | Santa Clara County, California | Presently operating light rail or streetcars in the United States | Bus transit | Intermodal transportation authorities | Santa Clara VTA light rail system | Articles which may contain original research
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world