A plurality (or "relative majority") is the largest share of something, which may or may not be a majority. For example, if an election had three candidates, who received 40%, 25%, and 35% of the vote, the candidate with 40% would have a plurality, but not a majority. Some elections or voting methods require merely a plurality; the best-known is the First Past The Post system, sometimes called plurality voting, but other systems such as Borda count are also plurality-based. Other systems require a majority, using methods such as runoff voting if a majority is not initially produced.

Plurality-based voting systems can be very simple and transparent compared to ones that require majorities; the simplest case, First Past The Post, simply allows each voter to select one candidate and awards the election to the candidate with the most votes. However, they are also the most prone to tactical voting, and can elect a candidate even though there is another candidate who would be preferred over them by the majority of voters.

For example, in a vote like this

• Candidate A, Democratic Socialist Party, 30%
• Candidate B, Progressive Socialist Party, 30%
• Candidate C, Conservative Party, 40%

it seems clear that a majority of voters - 60% - want a socialist candidate to be elected. However, because their vote is split between two candidates, the conservative candidate will be elected with a plurality even though conservatives are in a minority. This effect means that jurisdictions with plurality-based systems tend to have small numbers of active parties - often, as in the United States and the UK, only two parties with any real chance of election. In these systems it can be very difficult for any view not within the two established parties to be heard, as switching a vote from your favourite of the two most popular parties to a smaller party increases the chances that, with the vote split, the voter's less favoured of the two most popular parties will be elected.

It is even possible for a party with majority support to fail to be elected under these systems, if it is not one of the two traditional biggest parties; for example, in a First Past The Post vote:

• 40 voters (A) prefer party 1, followed by party 3
• 50 voters (B) prefer party 2, followed by party 3
• 60 voters (C) prefer party 3, followed by party 1
• 70 voters (D) prefer party 3, followed by party 2

In this case, party 3 is by far the preferred party, with 130 of the 220 voters preferring it to the other parties. However, if people think that only party 1 and party 2 (the traditionally established parties) have a chance of being elected, then these voters are likely to vote tactically for the party they prefer of the ones they consider electable; so in fact party 2 will be elected, with 120 votes, followed by party 1 with 100 votes. Party 3 will gain few votes, reinforcing the perception that it is unelectable and encouraging its supporters to continue to vote tactically in further elections between those parties.

See also

---

External links

---

• Article on the practical effects in Papua New Guinea of switching from a majority-based to a plurality-based voting system

Voting theory