The National Institute on Drug Abuse is a United States agency whose mission is to "lead the Nation in bringing the power of science to bear on drug abuse and addiction" *.
In 1974, NIDA was established with a mandate to carry on the work of the Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) and National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (now the National Survey on Drug Use and Health) A major purpose for NIDA's creation was to comply with the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances provision that "Parties shall assist persons whose work so requires to gain an understanding of the problems of abuse of psychotropic substances and of its prevention, and shall also promote such understanding among the general public if there is a risk that abuse of such substances will become widespread" [http://www.incb.org/e/conv/1971/articles.htm#20. In October 1992, NIDA became part of the National Institutes of Health under the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health is an annual study of American drug use patterns. According to NIDA, "The data collection method is in–person interviews conducted with a sample of individuals at their place of residence. ACASI provides a highly private and confidential means of responding to questions to increase the level of honest reporting of illicit drug use and other sensitive behavior." Sixty-eight thousand people were interviewed in 2003, with a weighted response rate for interviewing of seventy three percent Like DAWN, the Survey often results in controversy because of how the data is used by drug policy officials. Rob Kampia of Marijuana Policy Project stated in a September 5, 2002 press release, "The government reaches that exact same conclusion regardless of whether drug use is going up, down, or staying the same. If use is going up they say, `We're in a drug abuse emergency; we need to crack down harder.' If use is going down, they say, `Our strategy is working; we need to crack down harder.' A cynic might think they had made up their minds before even looking at the data" [http://www.mpp.org/releases/nr090502.html.
NIDA literature and National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) research frequently contradict each other. For instance, in the 1980s and 1990s, NIMH researchers found that dopamine plays only a marginal role in marijuana's psychoactive effects Years later, however, NIDA educational materials continued to warn of the danger of dopamine-related marijuana addiction THC with the reward system is not fully understood [http://www.nida.nih.gov/pubs/teaching/Teaching5.html" target="_blank" >*.
Speaking before the National Advisory Council on Drug Abuse, Rob Kampia of the Marijuana Policy Project criticized NIDA for refusing to provide researcher Donald Abrams with marijuana for his studies, stating that "after nine months of delay, Dr. Leshner rejected Dr. Abrams' request for marijuana, on what we believe are political grounds that the FDA-approved protocol is inadequate" *.
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"National Institute on Drug Abuse".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world