article

The Millenary Petition was a list of requests given to James I by Puritans in 1603 when he was on his way to claim the English throne. It is claimed, but not proved, that this petition had 1000 signatures. This carefully worded document expressed Puritan distaste regarding the state of Anglican Church, and took into consideration James' religious views as well as his liking for a debate, as written in Basilikon Doron. There was no hint of dissatisfaction with the royal supremacy in the petition, and the Puritan reformers stressed that they were not separatists or schismatics throughout.

The general Puritan feeling was that, despite Elizabeth's best efforts and the introduction of the new Book of Common Prayer, the Anglican church still remained too popish. There were, however, different types of puritan reformers. On one hand, there were the moderate reformers, and on the other, there were the extremist revolutionary reformers, who had hoped for deep, structural changes within the Anglican church. While many of the main Puritans goals were rebutted, the petition did culminate in the Hampton Court Conference, in which eventually led James to produce an English version of the bible, now known as the King James Version.

The Demands


The puritans rejected the following popish ceremonies *:

They also disliked popish terms such as Priest and Absolution, and rejected popish garments the clergy were obliged to wear at service. They wanted better observance of the sabbath, which was originally supported by James up until The Book of Sports. They wanted to end Pluralism, and claimed that ministers should be both 'able and sufficient men'.

The Puritans also requested some changes to ecclesiastical disipline. First, they asked, in a rather ambigious statement, that punishment only be enforced by Christ's own institution. Second, they claimed excommunication should not be imposed by lay officials. Third, they asked that men should not be excommunicated for "trifles and twelvepenny matters". Finally, they asked for better restraint in the use of ex officio oath.

Sources and further reading


  • Roger Lockyer, Tudor and Stuart Britain: 1485-1714, 2004. ISBN 0582771889.

See also


External links


  • http://www.learnthebible.org/preservation_king_james.htm
  • http://history.hanover.edu/texts/ENGref/er88.html

History of Britain | 17th century | Documents | Religion in the United Kingdom | 1603 works

 

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the "Millenary Petition".

Home Pageartsbusinesscomputersgameshealthhospitalshomekids & teensnewsphysiciansrecreationreferenceregionalscienceshoppingsocietysportsworld