Herbert Marshall McLuhan CC (July 21, 1911 – December 31, 1980) was a Canadian educator, philosopher, and scholar, professor of English literature, literary critic, and communications theorist, who is one of the founders of the study of media ecology.
Born Herbert Marshall McLuhan, in Edmonton, Alberta, to Herbert and Elsie (née Hall). The McLuhan family moved to Winnipeg, Manitoba, while Marshall was still a young child. While in Winnipeg, McLuhan would earn a BA and MA in English, after a one year stint as an engineering major, at the University of Manitoba. McLuhan later enrolled at the University of Cambridge. There, he would study under I. A. Richards and F. R. Leavis, and was influenced by New Criticism. Upon reflection later, he credited the faculty there for being chiefly concerned with the training of perception. This application finds resonance throughout his work, as do occasionally such notions of Richards' from the 1930s as feedforward.
During the 1936-37 academic year, McLuhan taught as a teaching assistant at the University of Wisconsin. On March 30, 1937, McLuhan culminated what was a slow but total conversion process when he was formally received into the Roman Catholic Church. Subsequently, he taught in Roman Catholic institutions of higher education. From 1937 to 1944 he taught English at Saint Louis University. There he taught and befriended Walter J. Ong (1912-2003), who would go on to do his Ph.D. dissertation on a topic McLuhan had called to his attention, and who would himself also later become a well-known authority on communication and technology. On August 4, 1939, McLuhan married Corinne Lewis of Fort Worth, Texas, and they spent 1939-40 at Cambridge University, where he continued to work on his doctoral dissertation on Thomas Nashe and the verbal arts. From 1944 to 1946 McLuhan taught at Assumption College in Windsor, Ontario.
From 1946 to 1979 he taught at St. Michael's College, University of Toronto, where Hugh Kenner was one of his students. McLuhan also taught at Fordham University one year (1967-68), when his son Eric McLuhan did the famed Fordham Experiment.
McLuhan's 1943 Cambridge University doctoral dissertation surveys the history of the verbal arts (grammar, dialectic and logic, and rhetoric – collectively known as the trivium) from the time of Cicero down to the time of Thomas Nashe. In his later publications, McLuhan at times uses the Latin concept of the trivium to outline an orderly and systematic picture of certain periods in the history of Western culture. McLuhan suggests that the Middle Ages, for instance, was characterized by the heavy emphasis on the formal study of logic. The key turn that led to the Renaissance was not the rediscovery of ancient texts but a reemphasis on the importance of rhetoric and language over the formal study of logic. This shift signaled in Renaissance humanism was largely a shift in emphasis, not a shift to totally eliminate one verbal art. Modern life is characterized by the reemergence of grammar as its most salient feature – an approach McLuhan felt was exemplified at times by the New Criticism of Richards and Leavis. (For a nuanced account of McLuhan's thought regarding Richards and Leavis, see McLuhan's "Poetic and Rhetorical Exegesis: The Case for Leavis against Richards and Empson" in the Sewanee Review, volume 52, number 2 (1944): 266-76.)
Because both dialectic and rhetoric in the classical trivium aimed at persuasion, it is not surprising that McLuhan, in The Mechanical Bride, turned his attention to analyzing and commenting on numerous contemporary examples of persuasion in popular culture. From centering his attention on persuasion in his doctoral dissertation and in his book, he made a dramatic inward turn, as it may be styled, in attending to the inwardness of persuasion carried out by communication media as such, as distinct from their content. His famous (or infamous, depending on your point of view) slogan "the medium is the message" (elaborated in his 1964 book, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man) uses hyperbole to call attention to the inward impact of communication media. However, it should be noted that he titled his later (1967) book The Medium is the Massage.
We can use Lonergan's terminology from Insight: A Study of Human Understanding to clarify the meaning of McLuhan's statement that "the medium is the message": At the empirical level of consciousness, the medium is the message, whereas at the intelligent and rational levels of consciousness, the content is the message.
When McLuhan declares that he is more interested in percepts than concepts, he is declaring in effect that he is more interested in what Lonergan refers to as the empirical level of consciousness than in what Lonergan refers to as the intelligent level of consciousness in which concepts are formed, which Lonergan distinguishes from the rational level of consciousness in which the adequacy of concepts and of predications is adjudicated. McLuhan's inward turn to attending to percepts and to the cultural conditioning of the empirical level of consciousness through the impact of communication media sets him apart from more outward oriented studies of sociological influences and the outward presentation of self carried out by George Herbert Mead, Erving Goffman, Berger and Luckmann, Kenneth Burke, Hugh Duncan, and others.
McLuhan's interest in the critical study of popular culture was influenced by the short book Culture and Environment by F.R. Leavis and Denys Thompson (1933).
According to McLuhan, a student at the University of Toronto told him that Harold Innis had put The Mechanical Bride on the reading list for one of his courses there, which led McLuhan to discover Innis's later work.
Throughout the book, McLuhan is at pains to reveal how communication technology (alphabetic writing, the printing press, and the electronic media) affects cognitive organization, which in turn has profound ramifications for social organization:
His episodic and often rambling history takes the reader from pre-alphabetic tribal humankind to the electronic age. According to McLuhan, the invention of movable type greatly accelerated, intensified, and ultimately enabled cultural and cognitive changes that had already been taking place since the invention and implementation of the alphabet, by which McLuhan means phonemic orthography. (McLuhan is careful to distinguish the phonetic alphabet from logographic/logogramic writing systems, like hieroglyphics or ideograms.)
Print culture, ushered in by the Gutenberg press in the middle of the fifteenth century, brought about the cultural predominance of the visual over the aural/oral. Quoting with approval an observation on the nature of the printed word from Prints and Visual Communication by William Ivins, McLuhan remarks:
The main concept of McLuhan's argument (later elaborated upon in The Medium is the Massage) is that new technologies (like alphabets, printing presses, and even speech itself) exert a gravitational effect on cognition, which in turn affects social organization: Print technology changes our perceptual habits ("visual homogenizing of experience"), which in turn impacts social interactions ("fosters a mentality that gradually resists all but a... specialist outlook"). According to McLuhan, the advent of print technology contributed to and made possible most of the salient trends in the Modern period in the Western world: individualism, democracy, Protestantism, capitalism and nationalism. For McLuhan, these trends all reverberate with print technology's principle of "segmentation of actions and functions and principle of visual quantification" (Galaxy p. 154).
Visual, individualistic print culture will soon — McLuhan is writing in the early 1960s — be brought to an end by what McLuhan calls "electronic interdependence," when electronic media replace visual culture with aural/oral culture. In this new age, humankind will move from individualism and fragmentation to a collective identity, with a "tribal base." McLuhan's coinage for this new social organization is the global village, a term which has predominantly negative connotations in The Gutenberg Galaxy (a fact lost on its later popularizers):
Note again McLuhan's stress on the importance of awareness of a medium's cognitive effects: If we are not vigilant to the effects of media's impact, the global village has the potential to become a place where totalitarianism and terror rule.
Key to McLuhan's argument is the idea that technology has no per se moral bent — it is a tool that shapes profoundly an individual's and, by extension, a society's self-conception and realization:
Technology affects cognition, and the moral valence of these changes is, for McLuhan, good or bad, depending on one's perspective. In the later seventeenth century, for instance, McLuhan identifies a considerable amount of alarm and revulsion towards the growing quantity of printed books. A few hundred years later, though, many thinkers express alarm at the "end of the book." If there can be no universal moral sentence passed on technology, McLuhan believes that "there can only be disaster arising from unawareness of the causalities and effects inherent in our technologies."
Though the World Wide Web was invented thirty years after The Gutenberg Galaxy was published, McLuhan is a popularizer or the coiner of the term "surfing" when used to refer to rapid, irregular and multidirectional movement through a heterogeneous body of documents or knowledge, e.g., statements like "Heidegger surf-boards along on the electronic wave as triumphantly as Descartes rode the mechanical wave." Paul Levinson's excellent 1999 book Digital McLuhan explores the ways that McLuhan's work can be better understood through the lens of the digital revolution.
McLuhan frequently quotes Ong's Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue (1958), which evidently had prompted McLuhan to write this book. Once again, Ong wrote a highly favorable review of this new book in America 107 (Sept. 15, 1962): 743, 747. However, in the 1967 New Catholic Encyclopedia, Ong subsequently qualified his earlier praise by characterizing McLuhan's The Gutenberg Galaxy as "a racy survey, indifferent to some scholarly detail, but uniquely valuable in suggesting the sweep and depth of the cultural and psychological changes entailed in the passage from illiteracy to print and beyond" (8: 838). McLuhan himself said of the book, "I'm not concerned to get any kudos out of Gutenberg Galaxy. It seems to me a book that somebody should have written a century ago. I wish somebody else had written it. It will be a useful prelude to the rewrite of Understanding Media 1960 NAEB report that I'm doing now."
McLuhan's The Gutenberg Galaxy won the 1963 Governor-General's Award for Non-Fiction, Canada's highest literary award. The chairman of the selection committee was McLuhan's colleague at the University of Toronto, and oftentimes intellectual sparring partner, Northrop Frye. W. Terrence Gordon, p. 109
McLuhan's most widely known work, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (1964), is also a pioneering study in media ecology. In it McLuhan proposes that media themselves, not the content they carry, should be the focus of study – popularly quoted as "the medium is the message" — it should be noted that Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer had developed such a theory in "The industrial production of cultural commodities" in Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944). McLuhan's theory is that a medium affects the society in which it plays a role not by the content delivered over the medium, but by the characteristics of the medium itself. McLuhan posits that a light bulb is the most clear demonstration of this concept. A light bulb does not have content in the way that a newspaper has articles or a television has programs. McLuhan posits that a light bulb has no content, yet it creates space; that is, a light bulb enables people to create spaces during nighttime that would otherwise be enveloped by darkness. McLuhan states that a light bulb creates an environment by its mere presence. (UM page 8) More controversially, he postulates that content had little effect on society – in other words, it did not matter if television broadcasts children's shows or violent programming, to illustrate one example – the effect of television on society would be identical. He notes that all media have characteristics that engaged the viewer in different ways; for instance, a passage in a book could be reread at will, but (at least until the advent of the videocassette) a movie had to be screened again in its entirety to study any individual part of it.
McLuhan also claims in the first part of "Understanding Media", that different media invite different degrees of participation on the part of a person who chooses to consume a medium. Some media, like the movies, enhance one single sense, in this case vision, in such a manner that a person does not need to exert much effort in filling in the details of a movie image. McLuhan contrasts this with TV, which he claims requires more effort on the part of viewer to determine meaning, and comics, which due to their minimal presentation of visual detail require a high degree of effort to fill in details that the cartoonist may have intended to portray. A movie is thus said by McLuhan to be "hot", intensifying one single sense "high definition", demanding a viewer's attention, and a comic book to be "cool" and "low definition", requiring much more conscious participation by the reader to extract value. (UM page 22)
In Understanding Media, McLuhan generally divides media into hot (high definition of information) and cool (low definition of information). A hot medium is one that extends one single sense in high definition. High definition means the state of being well-filled with data. A cool medium is one with low definition. Because of the lack of information, much has to be filled in by users. Therefore, a cool medium generally requires higher level of participation of users than a hot medium. When looking at the two different kinds of media, it can be interpreted that the hotter the medium, the less someone needs to interpret what is being presented to them, whereas the colder the medium, the more someone has to uncover and engage in the media. For example, this could be compared with hot a high definition photograph where the viewer can glean a lot of information contrasted with a blue print where the viewer has to 'fill in the blanks'.
Less enduring than McLuhan's better known aphorism, "the medium is the message," is "the medium is the massage." Nonetheless, in 1967, McLuhan would adopt the latter as the title of a book written with Quentin Fiore, begun during McLuhan's tenure at Fordham University in New York City as Albert Schweizer Chair in Humanities. According to McLuhan biographer W. Terrence Gordon, "by the time it appeared in 1967, McLuhan no doubt recognized that his original saying had become a cliché and welcomed the opportunity to throw it back on the compost heap of language to recycle and revitalize it. But the new title is more than McLuhan indulging his insatiable taste for puns, more than a clever fusion of self-mockery and self-rescue; the subtitle is "An Inventory of Effects," underscoring the lesson compressed into the original saying."W. Terrence Gordon, p. 175 In this book, McLuhan adopts the term "massage" to denote the effect each medium has on the human sensorium, inventorying the "effects" of numerous media in terms of how they "massage" the sensorium.
Near the beginning of the book, McLuhan adopts a pattern in which an image is presented, and on the next page the choice of image is explained by a synopsis of each media effect, followed by a new image and the facing page, with another explanation and so on. The shifting of analytic registers, from "reading" typographic print to "scanning" photographic facsimiles, reinforces McLuhan's overarching argument in this book, namely, that each medium produces a different "massage" or "effect" on the human sensorium.
In "'The Medium is the Massage,'" McLuhan rehearses the argument, which first appears in the Prologue to 1962's "'The Gutenberg Galaxy'", that media are "extensions" of our human senses, bodies and minds.
Changing from this pattern into a more conversational style, McLuhan presents key changing points in how man has viewed the world and how these views were changed by the adoption of new media. "The technique of invention was the discovery of the nineteenth *", brought on by the adoption of fixed points of view and perspective by typography, while "The technique of the suspended judgment is the discovery of the twentieth century", brought on by the bard abilities of radio, movies and television. (pg 69)
McLuhan uses James Joyce's Finnegans Wake as a major inspiration towards the study of war throughout history as an indicator as to how war may be conducted in the future.
McLuhan claims that the ten thunders in the Wake represent different stages in the history of man (pg 46):
An audio recording version of McLuhan's most famous work was made by Columbia Records. The recording consists of a pastiche of statements made by McLuhan interrupted by other speakers, including people speaking in various phonations and falsettos, discordant sounds and 1960's incidental music in what could be considered a deliberate attempt to translate the disconnected images seen on TV into an audio format, resulting in the prevention of a connected stream of conscious thought. Various audio recording techniques and statements are used to illustrate the relationship between spoken, literary speech and the characteristics of electronic audio media. McLuhan biographer Philip Marchand called the recording "the 1967 equivalent of a McLuhan video."
McLuhan's statement that the content of any medium is another medium leads the concept of a figure and a ground. Here McLuhan claims that when a new medium is created, it will eventually overtake those media from which its content is derived as an innovation. The older medium becomes a ground upon which the new medium stands as a more noticed figure.
A tetrad is a means of examining the effects of a medium on society by dividing its effects into four categories and displaying them simultaneously. Visually, a tetrad consists of five diamonds forming an X, with the name of media listed in its centre. The two diamonds on the left of a tetrad are the Enhancement and Retrieval qualities of the medium, both Figure qualities. The two diamonds on the right of a tetrad are the Reversal and Obsolescence qualities, both Ground qualities.
Enhancement (figure): The amplification of practical solutions to known problems.
Retrieval (figure): The recovery of old values. Transition of ground to figure.
Reversal (ground): Unexpected and new problems when a medium is amplified too much.
Obsolescence (ground): The erosion of contemporary values. Transition from figure to ground.
Nonetheless, McLuhan soon became a fixture of media discourse from then on. For example, Newsweek magazine did a cover story on him. He made a cameo appearance as himself in Woody Allen's movie Annie Hall. Alvy Singer (Allen's character) presents McLuhan to rebuff the professor behind Alvy, who is trying to impress his date with his discussion of Marshall McLuhan's work. He corrects the professor and derisively asks how he ever became a professor. Woody captured an important aspect of McLuhan's personality – having him utter the line "You know nothing of my work, and how you got to teach a course in anything is totally amazing." According to some of his biographers, McLuhan was fond of telling his students and others that they simply did not understand him, no matter how much of his work they had studied.P. Marchand, p. 117 Playboy magazine published a lengthy interview with McLuhan.
He is mentioned in the song Broadway Melody of 1974 by progressive rock band Genesis, featured on their 1974 album The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway. The lyrics read: "Marshall McLuhan, casual viewin', head buried in the sand." During the late 1990s, the Canadian rock band 5140 initially titled their sixth release for EMI Records Canada "Marshall McLuhan, Casual Viewin," but were forced to change it due to copyright infringement.
In 1983 he was lampooned in the David Cronenberg film Videodrome, where his character was given the name "Professor Brian O'Blivion" and issued such memorable quotes as "The television screen has become the retina of the mind's eye" and "I refuse to appear on television, except on television".
In 1970, McLuhan was made a Companion of the Order of Canada. After McLuhan's death, his former student and friend Walter J. Ong wrote what is arguably the most favorable assessment of McLuhan in print anywhere to this day: "McLuhan as Teacher: The Future Is a Thing of the Past," Journal of Communication 31 (1981): 129-35.
As mentioned above, Oxford University Press published the 550-page Letters of Marshall McLuhan in 1987. Two biographies of McLuhan have been published – one by Philip Marchand in 1989 and the other by W. Terrence Gordon in 1997. Books and articles in which McLuhan's thought is discussed are far too numerous to enumerate here.
Further information about McLuhan's thought can be found in The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism (1st ed. 1994: 481-83; 2nd ed. 2005: 643-45), Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory: Approaches, Scholars, Terms (U of Toronto P, 1993: 421-23), and Encyclopedia of Literary Critics and Criticism (Fitzroy Dearborn, 1999: 744-47).
Recognizing his lasting global influence for his pioneering work on the study of media ecology, the government of Canada honoured him with his image on a postage stamp in 2000.
In 2004, the University of Chicago Press noted that Marshall McLuhan and Walter Ong today "enjoy the status of honorary guru* among technophiles" (see the back cover of Ong's Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue: From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason that was reissued by the University of Chicago Press in 2004, with a new foreword by Adrian Johns).
On March 27-28, 1998, Fordham University sponsored a symposium on the Legacy of McLuhan, who had taught at Fordham for one year. In 2005, Hampton Press published papers from the symposium as the book The Legacy of McLuhan, edited by Lance Strate.
"The Table Talk of Marshall McLuhan." by Peter C. Newman. Maclean's, June 1971, pp. 42, 45.
"An Interview With Marshall McLuhan: His Outrageous Views About Women." by Linda Sandler. Miss Chatelaine, September 3, 1974, pp. 58-59, 82-87, 90-91.
"It Will Probably End the Motor Car: An Interview With Marshall McLuhan." by Kirwan Cox and S. M. Crean. Cinema Canada, August 1976, pp. 26-29.
"Interview With Professor Marshall McLuhan." Maclean's, March 7, 1977.
1911 births | 1980 deaths | 20th century philosophers | Canadian expatriate academics in the United States | Canadian literary critics | Canadian philosophers | Companions of the Order of Canada | Edmontonians | Literary critics of English | Media theorists | New Criticism | North American cultural studies | Philosophers of technology | Postmodernism | Rhetoric | Rhetoricians | Roman Catholic Canadians | Saint Louis University faculty | University of Manitoba alumni | Winnipeggers
Marshall McLuhan | Marshall McLuhan | Marshall McLuhan | Marshall McLuhan | מרשל מקלוהן | Marshall McLuhan | マーシャル・マクルーハン | Marshall McLuhan | Marshall McLuhan | Маклюэн, Маршалл | Marshall McLuhan | Marshall McLuhan | Marshall McLuhan
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Marshall McLuhan".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world