In mathematics, the limit of a function is a fundamental concept in mathematical analysis.
Rather informally, to say that a function f has limit L at a point p, is to say that we can make the value of f as close to L as we want, by taking points close enough to p. Formal definitions, first devised around the end of the 19th century, are given below.
To motivate the definition of a limit, consider the following informal statement:
To contextualize this informal statement, imagine a traveler walking along the graph of y=f(x). Her horizontal position is measured by the value of x: this is like the position given by a map of the land or by a global positioning system. Her altitude is given by the coordinate y. She is walking towards the horizontal position given by x=c. As she does so, she notices that her altitude approaches L. If later asked to guess the altitude over x=c, she would then answer L, even if she had never actually reached that position.
What, then, does it mean to say that her altitude approaches L? It means that her altitude gets nearer and nearer to L. In other words, she gets close to L except for a possible small error in accuracy. For example, suppose we set a particular accuracy goal for our traveler: she must get within a meter of L. She reports back that indeed she can get within one meter: she notes that when she is within five meters from x=c, her altitude is always one meter or less from L. We then change our accuracy goal: can she get within one centimeter? Yes. If she is within seven centimeters of x=c, then her altitude remains within one centimeter of the target L. In summary, to say that the traveler's altitude approaches L as her horizontal position approaches c means that for every target accuracy goal, there is some neighborhood of c whose altitude remains within that accuracy goal.
The initial informal statement can now be explicated
This explicit statement is quite close to the formal definition of the limit of a function with values in a Hausdorff topological space.
In this case, it is customary to write
Suppose f : (M,dM) -> (N,dN) is a map between two metric spaces, p is a limit point of M and L∈N. We say that the limit of f at p is L and write
if and only if for every ε > 0 there exists a δ > 0 such that for all x∈M with 0 < dM(x, p) < δ, we have dN(f(x), L) < ε.
The real line with metric is a metric space. Also the extended real line with metric is a metric space.
Suppose f(x) is a real-valued function. We can also consider the limit of function when x increases or decreases indefinitely.
We write
or we write
Similarly, we can define the expressions
There are three basic rules for evaluating limits at infinity for a rational function f(x) = p(x)/q(x):
The complex plane with metric is also a metric space. There are two different types of limits when we consider complex-valued functions.
Suppose f is a complex-valued function, then we write
It is just a particular case of functions over metric spaces with both M and N are the complex plane.
By noting that |x-p| represents a distance, the definition of a limit can be extended to functions of more than one variable.
To say that the limit of a function f at p is L is equivalent to saying
If the sets A, B, ... form a finite partition of the function domain, , ... and the relative limit for each of those sets exist and is the equal to, say, L, then the limit exists for the point x and is equal to L.
The function f is continuous at p if and only if the limit of f(x) as x approaches p exists and is finite. Equivalently, f transforms every sequence in M which converges towards p into a sequence in N which converges towards f(p).
Again, if N is a normed vector space, then the limit operation is linear in the following sense: if the limit of f(x) as x approaches p is L and the limit of g(x) as x approaches p is P, then the limit of f(x) + g(x) as x approaches p is L + P. If a is a scalar from the base field, then the limit of af(x) as x approaches p is aL.
Taking the limit of functions is compatible with the algebraic operations, provided the limits on the right sides of the identity below exist:
(the last provided that the denominator is non-zero). In each case above, when the limits on the right do not exist, or, in the last case, when the limits in both the numerator and the denominator are zero, nonetheless the limit on the left may still exist -- this depends on which functions f and g are.
These rules are also valid for one-sided limits, for the case p = ±∞, and also for infinite limits using the rules
(see extended real number line).
Note that there is no general rule for the case q / 0; it all depends on the way 0 is approached. Indeterminate forms — for instance, 0/0, 0×∞, ∞−∞, and ∞/∞ — are also not covered by these rules, but the corresponding limits can often be determined with L'Hôpital's rule.
Grenzwert (Funktion) | Límite de una función | Limite di una funzione | Limiet van een functie | Granica funkcji | Предел функции | ลิมิตของฟังก์ชัน
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Limit of a function".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world