Computers and other typing devices offer many different keyboard layouts for inputting data in different languages. The standard English keyboard layout is known as QWERTY. Various alternatives to the QWERTY layout have been suggested, many claiming advantages such as higher typing speeds. The most famous alternative is the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard.
The standard keyboard structure also includes the control, alternative, and function keys. These keys are commonly known as modifier keys.
Many languages include characters additional to the standard upper and lower case 26-letter alphabet, such as accented characters, that do not easily fit onto a standard English-language keyboard (UK, US or other varieties). Typing accented characters is made easier by using the dead key feature. When a dead key is pressed, nothing happens on the screen, but then pressing the character to be accented makes the desired accented character appear on the screen. For example, typing the acute accent dead key followed by the letter a gives á. To type a diacritical mark on its own, it needs to be followed by a space.
In the Mac OS, dead keys are accessed with the option (alt) key as follows:
| ´ | option-e |
| ` | option-` |
| ¨ | option-u |
| ^ | option-i |
| ~ | option-n |
which is then followed by the letter the accent is intended for. For example, the keypresses option-e e results in the é character. In Mac OS X, pressing one of these key combinations creates the accent and hi-lights it, then produces the finalized character when a vowel is pressed, or simply leaves the accent if a consonant is pressed.
While the core of the keyboard, the alphabetic section, remains fairly constant, and the numbers from 1-9 are almost invariably on the top row, keyboards differ vastly in:
By far the most widespread, the only one not confined to a particular geographical area. Keys like "enter" and "caps lock" have not been translated from the language of the keyboard in question.
United States keyboards are also used in Canada.
Note:
The US keyboard layout does not use AltGr or any dead keys, and thus offers no way of inputting any sort of diacritic or accent; this makes it unsuitable for all but a handful of languages.
U.S. keyboards are used not only in the United States, but also in most English-speaking countries, e.g. Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. In the United Kingdom, UK keyboards are used. See British and American keyboards for details.
The QWERTZ layout is fairly widely used in Germany and much of Central Europe. The main difference between it and QWERTY is that Y and Z are swapped, and most special characters such as brackets are replaced by German special characters.
The AZERTY layout is used in France, Belgium and some neighbouring countries. It differs from the QWERTY layout thus:
The French AZERTY keyboard also has special characters used in the French language, such as ç, à é, è, and other characters such as &, " ,' ,§, , all located under the numbers.
Some French people use the Canadian Multilingual standard keyboard. The Portuguese (Portugal) keyboard layout is also be preferable, as it provides all French accents (acute, grave, tréma, tilde, circumflex, cedilla, and also quotation marks «») and its dead-letter option for all the accent keys allow for easy input of all the possibilities in French and most other languages(áàäãâéèëêíìïîóòöõôúùüû). Ç is, however, a separate key, as can be seen above.
The Belgian AZERTY was developed from the French AZERTY but some adaptions were made in the 1980s. All letters remain the same as on the French keyboard, but some signs (? ! @ - _ + = §) are on different locations.
There are also keyboard layouts that do not resemble QWERTY/QWERTZ/AZERTY very closely, if at all. Best-known among these is the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard layout (named after its inventor, not the key order), which reduces finger movement and is claimed by some proponents to offer higher typing speed along with ergonomic benefits. Some languages use the Roman script but with non-QWERTY-based keyboard layouts, such as Latvian and Turkish (the majority of Turkish keyboards are QWERTY, though the "Turkish-F keyboard layout"* is older and said to be better suited to the language).
A syllabic chord keyboard is a keyboard with three sets of keys that are used to type in a single syllable with one (combined) keystroke.
Besides Dvorak, other keyboard layouts include:
This is not a general rule, and many non-Roman keyboard layouts have been invented from scratch.
Most non-Roman keyboard layouts have the capacity to be used to input Roman letters as well as the script of the language, for example, when typing in URLs or names. This may be done through a special key on the keyboard devoted to this task, or through some special combination of keys, or through software programs that do no interact with the keyboard much.
People who do not have a Cyrillic keyboard sometimes use a phonetic (transliterated) layout where 'А' is obtained by pressing 'A', Russian 'Б' by pressing 'B', 'Д' by pressing 'D', 'О' by pressing 'O' etc. See also Russian keyboard: standard and phonetic.
The Bulgarian Phonetic layout. Although not standard, this layout is widespread because of its similarity to the QWERTY layout. It is a Phonetic not Transliteration layout, and produces cyrillic symbols.
Both layouts are in widespread use.
Transliteration using Roman script is used only in informal electronic written communication, mainly because of a long history of compatibility issues with different encodings, history of lack of native OS support and user laziness.
In general, first the range of possibilities is narrowed down (most often by entering the desired character's pronunciation), then, if there remains more than one possibility, selecting the desired ideogram either by typing the number before the character, or using a graphical menu to select it. The computer assists the typist by using heuristics to guess which character is most likely desired. Although this may sound clumsy, East Asian input methods are today sufficiently sophisticated that for both beginners and experts, typing in these languages is only slightly slower than typing English.
In Japanese, the QWERTY-based JIS keyboard layout is used, and the pronunciation of each character is entered using Hepburn romanization or Kunrei-shiki romanization. There are several kana-based typing methods. See also Japanese language and computers.
Chinese has the most complex and varied input methods. Characters can be entered by pronunciation (like Japanese and Korean) or by structure. Most of the structural methods are the most difficult to learn, but they are extremely fast for experienced typists, as they do away with the need for selecting characters from a menu. For a detailed treatment, see Chinese input methods for computers.
There exist a variety of other, slower ways a character may be entered. If the pronunciation of a character is not known, the selection can be narrowed down by giving its component shapes, radicals, and stroke count. Also, many input systems include a "drawing pad" permitting "handwriting" of a character using a mouse. Finally, if the computer does not have CJK software installed, it may be possible to enter a character directly through its encoding number (e.g. Unicode).
In contrast to Chinese and Japanese, Korean is typed the same way as Western languages. There are two major kinds of keyboard layouts: dubeolsik and sebeolsik. Dubeolsik, based on the QWERTY keyboard, is more commonly used. While Korean consonants and vowels (jamo) are grouped together into syllabic characters when written, the language itself is actually alphabetical, and therefore typing in Korean is quite simple for someone who understands the Korean alphabet Hangul. Each jamo is assigned to a single key. As the user types letters, the computer automatically groups them into syllabic characters. Given a sequence of jamo, there is only one unambiguous way letters can be validy grouped into syllables, so this grouping is done seamlessly by the computer, with the result that Korean can be typed in the same way as English or any other alphabetical language.
This is an example with Cangjie (blue) and Bopomofo/Zhuyin (red).
In Hong Kong, both Chinese (Traditional) and US keyboards are found. Japanese keyboards are occasionally found, but UK keyboards are rare.
See also British and American keyboards, Technical standards in colonial Hong Kong
A Chinese (Traditional) keyboard has a US layout with Chinese input method labels printed on the keys. These keyboards can be used for Roman characters, provided that US keyboard layout is selected in the operating system.
See the section on Chinese languages above, and also Chinese input methods for computers.
Usually the JIS keyboard is used. Some people type Hiragana directly, but most people prefer typing Latin alphabets, which are automatically converted to Hiragana. In both cases, the Alt+Zen/Han key combination is used to switch on input method editor. Some people prefer the US layout, in which case Alt+` does the role, or Cmd-Space for Macs.
See the section on East Asian languages above, also Japanese language and computers and Japanese input methods.
Among the ways of measuring the benefits of an individual keyboard layout are the distance travelled by the typist's fingers while typing, the amount of alteration between hands and fingers, and the number of keys pressed in the home row. When run through a keyboard layout comparison applet created by a Jon A. Maxwell with extra layouts added, text taken from the section "East Asian Languages" in this article on April 19, 2006, beginning with "Chinese, Japanese and Korean" and ending with "(e.g. Unicode)." yielded the following results:
| Layout | Distance | Same hand | Same finger | Total keys | Number row | Top row | Home row | Bottom row | ZXCV in Qwerty position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QWERTY | 71.96 m | 38.03% | 4.985% | 2824 | 0.837% | 49.22% | 31.37% | 18.55% | |
| ASSET | 31.45 m | 32.25% | 2.764% | 2824 | 0.837% | 18.60% | 72.72% | 7.834% | |
| Capewell evolved (0.9.3) | 35.05 m | 39.21% | 2.471% | 2824 | 0.837% | 16.75% | 67.32% | 15.08% | |
| Colemak | 35.57 m | 33.43% | 1.089% | 2824 | 0.837% | 15.29% | 71.47% | 12.40% | |
| Klausler 2 | 35.90 m | 24.21% | 2.346% | 2824 | 0.837% | 21.36% | 71.17% | 6.619% | |
| Dvorak (I and U switched) | 36.00 m | 23.41% | 4.105% | 2824 | 0.544% | 23.16% | 68.07% | 8.211% | |
| Klausler 1 | 36.04 m | 32.34% | 1.340% | 2824 | 0.837% | 21.49% | 69.41% | 8.253% | |
| QWERAK | 36.19 m | 36.32% | 4.273% | 2824 | 0.837% | 22.91% | 68.16% | 8.085% | |
| Capewell Dvorak | 36.21 m | 24.00% | 2.513% | 2824 | 0.837% | 17.46% | 68.20% | 13.48% | |
| Dvorak | 38.89 m | 23.41% | 4.105% | 2824 | 0.544% | 23.16% | 68.07% | 8.211% | |
| Plum Keyboard | 38.94 m | 42.73% | 6.828% | 2824 | 0.837% | 17.63% | 72.55% | 8.965% | |
| Arensito | 42.08 m | 44.57% | 6.116% | 2824 | 0.837% | 14.91% | 60.11% | 24.13% | |
| Capewell QWERF 2006 | 50.91 m | 38.03% | 4.985% | 2824 | 0.837% | 27.77% | 52.82% | 18.55% | |
| Capewell QWERF | 51.77 m | 38.03% | 5.152% | 2824 | 0.837% | 29.95% | 51.73% | 17.46% | |
| XPeRT | 60.80 m | 29.66% | 6.954% | 2824 | 0.837% | 36.53% | 48.72% | 13.90% |
While not a scientificaly valid measure of how well each layout performs, the results lend some credibility to the notion that Dvorak outperforms QWERTY. They also seem to indicate that the second evolved layout created by Peter Klausler achieves very similar results to Dvorak, while the ASSET layout consistently achieves the lowest distance, but with less hand alteration.
Notes: The text sample used was rendered using Mozilla Firefox, resulting in five less line breaks than would have been the case with the Opera browser. With other text samples, the Plum Keyboard seems to have a tendency to have the most keys on the home row, rather than the ASSET layout.
Computer keyboards | Keyboard layouts
Клавиатурна подредба | Tastaturlayout | Klavarofasono | Tata letak keyboard | キー配列 | Раскладка клавиатуры
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Keyboard layout".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world