Judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) is a motion made by a party, during trial, claiming the opposing party has insufficient evidence to reasonably support its case. JMOL is similar to summary judgment, which is a motion made before trial. JMOL is also known as a directed verdict, which it has replaced in American Federal courts.

In United States Federal courts, JMOL is a creation of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 50. JMOL is decided by the standard of whether a reasonable jury could find in favor of the party opposing the JMOL motion. If there is no evidence to support a reasonable conclusion for the opposing party, judgment is entered by the court and the case is over. If there is sufficient evidence to make a reasonable conclusion in favor of the opposing party, but there is equally strong evidence to support an opposite conclusion, the party with the burden of production fails.

Timing is very important in making a motion for JMOL; the motion can only be made once the opposing party has presented its case. In civil cases, the plaintiff presents her case, then the defendant presents her case, then the plaintiff may present a rebuttal. So, once the plaintiff has presented her case, the defendant may move for JMOL, but the plaintiff may not. Once the defendant has finished presenting her case, the plaintiff may move for JMOL, and so may the defendant.

Most importantly, JMOL must be made before the case is put to the jury for deliberation, otherwise it offends Seventh amendment due process rights, and is thus unconstitutional. Therefore, JMOL must be made by motion after the opposing party has presented its case and before the case has been submitted to the jury.

If a JMOL motion is denied initially, it may be tried again after the jury verdict is returned, as a renewed judgment as a matter of law.

See also

• renewed judgment as a matter of law
• new trial
• summary judgment
• judgment notwithstanding the verdict

Civil procedure