Competition classes in gliding, as in other sports, are created as a means to promote the development of the sport. Classes may be created to further a sporting policy or as an answer to popularity, market and technology trends.
Class policy in gliding mostly seeks to promote fairness in competition, contain the cost of access to the sport and establish a stable environment for investment decisions by both manufacturers and competitors. Gliding enjoys a well integrated institutional framework at the international level which ensures that essentially the same classes and class definitions are followed in all countries.
As gliding is by its very nature performance-oriented, classes have not been targeted at fostering technological development, which has been stimulated mostly by market dynamics and by a strong cross-feeding between research and industry.
Gliding World Records are classified by the FAI under sub-classes that do not have a one-to-one correspondence with the above competition classes:
A microlift class with an upper limit of 18 kg/m² wing loading to encompass types such as the Carbon Dragon is currently under discussion.
Glider classes not recognised by the FAI have been used in some regional and national competitions. The most significant of these are:
This unrestricted class has been a favourite testing ground for technological innovation. Many research prototypes fall under this class definition, eg. the Akaflieg Darmstadt D-30 of 1938, which had variable-dihedral wings and spars built of light alloys, the extremely large-span SB-10 of 1972, the telescoping-wing Akaflieg Stuttgart FS 29 of 1975 and the solar-powered Icare.
In contests, the Open Class usually delivers the top performances, with daily tasks above 1000 km being possible in favourable weather. To be successful, however, an Open class glider must blend high performance with practicality. "Extreme" designs tend to be failures, of which the Austria of 1931, the Sigma of 1971 and the BJ series are but the most conspicuous examples. Arguably the only 'extreme' glider that ever won a World Championships was the Nimbus I.
The Open class is, notwithstanding its name, rather exclusive. Until the 1960's a fair number of gliders was able to do well in open competition, with smaller-span types occasionally beating larger but more cumbersome types. The composite revolution caused a shake-down, further aggravated when the ASW 22 and Nimbus-3 were introduced in 1981, after which the Open Class became the preserve of only two manufacturers.
Following a couple of decades of small, incremental performance gains, the appearance in 2000 of the eta brought a sudden jump in performance and a further price escalation. This very expensive aircraft has up to now not found outstandingly success in competition, but it will unavoidably impact the cost of remaining competitive in the class. The 'eta biter' (a highly modified ASW 22 first seen at the 2006 World Gliding Championships) and the 'Concordia' single-seater project are both being presented as challengers to eta.
Technological change was fast paced in the years following the introduction of the Standard Class. The transition to fibreglass construction made the existing rules increasingly awkward. The stronger composite structures allowed higher wing loadings, and competitors resorted to fixed ballast to exploit this competitive advantage, which of course increased landing speeds and the risk of damage when alighting in unprepared fields. The fixed undercarriages caused a major fraction of the drag of sleek fibreglass airframes. Designers reacted by recessing the wheels into the fuselage, which further increased the risk of ground-related damage. Manufacturers took to arguing that the single cheapest way to increase performance was to retract the wheel.
In view of these safety and cost-related arguments, the Standard Class rules were updated to allow disposable water ballast and retractable undercarriages. The requirement for large airbrakes able to limit speed in a vertical dive was dropped, and trailing-edge airbrakes, championed especially by the American Richard Schreder as a cheaper glidepath control device, were for the first time allowed.
The later concession would bring difficulties in that the demarcation line between airbrake/landing flaps and performance enhancing flaps is vague. The reluctance within the IGC to allow the later in the Standard Class led to an unsuccessful attempt to codify what constitutes a landing flap. After the LS2 and the PIK-20 exploited this loophole to win the 1974 and 1976 World Championships in the Standard Class, the IGC banned all camber-changing devices from the class and created a parallel 15 metre Class to accommodate them. This decision was polemic as it was the second rule change in a few years and it orphaned several gliders types that did not fit well within either class definition (especially the PIK-20 and the Libelle that had been built in large numbers). Notwithstanding, the decision was vindicated by the great success subsequently enjoyed by both the Standard and 15 metre classes.
Some significant Standard Class types are the Ka-6 and Mucha (1958), the LS1 (1967), the Standard Cirrus (1969), the LS4 (1980) and the Discus (1984).
Significant 15 metre types include the ASW 20 (1977), Ventus (1980), LS6 (1983) and Ventus-2 (1994).
Following a decade of contests at regional level, which permitted the resolution of issues such as mixed glider/motorglider competition, this class came to feature for the first time in a World Championships in 2001.
The very large spans made possible by modern materials have obliterated the performance gap that once existed between single and two seaters in Open Class competition. Today double seaters are increasingly common and often win in this class.
The IGC voted in 2005 to reinstate a Two Seater Class with a span limitation of 20 metres. This class has no relationship to the 'old' two seater class, as it targets the high performance trainers that have been steadily gaining in popularity. Their smaller size sets them apart from the Open Class two seaters which are very expensive and require highly experienced crews. The 20 metre double seaters handle and fly very much like Standard Class single seaters and cost little more than half the price of an Open Class "ship".
The contenders in this class are principally the Duo Discus and DG-1000, with the older Janus and DG-500 and a smattering of other types also being eligible.
The formal recognition by the FAI of a handicapped class is however quite recent, with the first Club Class World Championships having taken place only in 2001. It is intended by the FAI as an affordable entry-level class. It has been extremely successful, attracting some of the most talented and experienced pilots in addition to the young or impecunious it was supposed to target. Among the reasons for this are the long lifespans of gliders that invite their continued use, the relative simplicity of the class rules where e.g. water ballast is not allowed and the typically more relaxed "atmosphere" of Club Class competitions.
The glider types allowed are not explicitly defined. The criterion for admission is given by an interval of performance handicaps, which may be adjusted by the organisers of each event but that is understood to exclude the current state-of-the-art gliders. It is further understood to comprise only standard class types (unflapped, 15 meter span).
The class is perceived as being fair in spite of the diferences in glider performance. This may become compromised by the trend towards modification/customisation of club class gliders in ways that distort the handicapping and are difficult to control by the sporting bodies.
The emergence of the Club Class is a significant factor in the decline of the World Class, as it is equally affordable, yields higher performances and allows a degree of personal choise in equipment that does not exist in the World Class.
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Glider Competition Classes".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world