Fermat's little theorem (not to be confused with Fermat's last theorem) states that if p is a prime number, then for any integer a,
A variant of this theorem is stated in the following form: if p is a prime and a is an integer coprime to p, then
In other words, if p is a prime number and a is any integer that does not have p as a factor, then a^(p-1) will leave a remainder of 1 when divided by p.
Fermat's little theorem is the basis for the Fermat primality test.
Examples of the theorem include:
Pierre de Fermat first stated the theorem in a letter dated October 18, 1640 to his friend and confidant Frénicle de Bessy as the following *: p divides whenever p is prime and a is coprime to p.
As usual, Fermat did not prove his assertion, only stating:
Euler first published a proof in 1736 in a paper entitled "Theorematum Quorundam ad Numeros Primos Spectantium Demonstratio", but Leibniz left virtually the same proof in an unpublished manuscript from sometime before 1683.
The term "Fermat's Little Theorem" was first used in 1913 in Zahlentheorie by Kurt Hensel:
It was first used in English in an article by Irving Kaplansky, "Lucas's Tests for Mersenne Numbers," American Mathematical Monthly, 52 (Apr., 1945).
Chinese mathematicians independently made the related hypothesis (sometimes called the Chinese Hypothesis) that p is a prime if and only if . It is true that if p is prime, then (this is a special case of Fermat's little theorem). However, the converse (if then p is prime), and therefore the hypothesis as a whole, is false (e.g. 341=11×31 is a pseudoprime, see below).
It is widely stated that the Chinese hypothesis was developed about 2000 years before Fermat's work in the 1600's. Despite the fact that the hypothesis is partially incorrect, it is noteworthy that it may have been known to ancient mathematicians. Some, however, claim that the widely propagated belief that the hypothesis was around so early sprouted from a misunderstanding, and that it was actually developed in 1872. For more on this, see (Ribenboim, 1995).
Fermat explained his theorem without a proof. The first one who gave a proof was Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in a manuscript without a date, where he wrote also that he knew a proof before 1683.
See Proofs of Fermat's little theorem.
A slight generalization of the theorem, which immediately follows from it, is as follows: if p is prime and m and n are positive integers with , then In this form, the theorem is used to justify the RSA public key encryption method.
Fermat's little theorem is generalized by Euler's theorem: for any modulus n and any integer a coprime to n, we have
This can be further generalized to Carmichael's theorem.
The theorem has a nice generalization also in finite fields.
If a and p are coprime numbers such that is divisible by p, then p need not be prime. If it is not, then p is called a pseudoprime to base a. F. Sarrus in 1820 found 341 = 11×31 as one of the first pseudoprimes, to base 2.
A number p that is a pseudoprime to base a for every number a coprime to p is called a Carmichael number (e.g. 561 is a Carmichael number).
Modular arithmetic | Mathematical theorems
Малка теорема на Ферма | Malá Fermatova věta | Kleiner fermatscher Satz | Pequeño teorema de Fermat | Petit théorème de Fermat | 페르마의 소정리 | Teorema kecil Fermat | Piccolo teorema di Fermat | המשפט הקטן של פרמה | Kis Fermat-tétel | Kleine stelling van Fermat | フェルマーの小定理 | Małe twierdzenie Fermata | Малая теорема Ферма | Fermatov mali izrek | Fermat'n pieni lause | Fermats lilla sats | 费马小定理
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Fermat's little theorem".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world