The Eurozone (also called Euro Area, Eurosystem or Euroland) is the subset of European Union member states which have adopted the euro, creating a currency union. The European Central Bank is responsible for the monetary policy within the eurozone.
Euro accession.PNG|thumb|300px|
States outside the EU using the euro are shown with blue crosshatching.]]
Likewise, Montenegro and Kosovo, which used to have the German mark as their de facto currency, also adopted the euro without having entered into any legal arrangements with the EU explicitly permitting them to do so. Kosovo uses the euro instead of the Serbian dinar, mainly for political reasons.
As of 1 December, 2002, North Korea has replaced the US dollar with the euro as its official currency for international trading. (Its internal currency, the won, is not convertible and thus cannot be used to purchase foreign goods.) The euro also enjoys popularity domestically, especially among resident foreigners.
Prior to the 2003 Invasion of Iraq, President Saddam Hussein announced that he intended to price Iraqi oil in euros, rather than US dollars, since the majority of Iraqi oil trade is with the EU, India and the People's Republic of China, not with the USA.
Euro outside.PNG|thumb|300px|
]]
The other 13 countries of the European Union that do not use the euro are: Denmark, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the ten member states that joined the Union on 1 May 2004; namely Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia.
Denmark and the United Kingdom got special derogations in the original Maastricht Treaty of the European Union. Both countries are not legally required to join the Eurozone unless their governments decide otherwise, either by parliamentary vote or referendum. Sweden, however, did not, and is technically obliged to introduce the euro at some point in the future.
| Date of entry | Country | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 January 1999 | The Danish krone entered the ERM II in 1999, when the euro was created. Since then, it floats against the euro in ±2.25% range. | |
| 28 June 2004 | Estonia had pegged its currency to the German Mark, and then the euro. | |
| The Lithuanian litas was pegged to the US dollar until 2 February 2002, when it switched to a euro peg. | ||
| The Slovenian tolar floats in a ±15% range (1 eur = 239.64 sit) against the euro. (Since entering into ERM II it has floated in the range of ±1%) | ||
| 2 May, 2005 | ||
| Latvia has a currency board arrangement whose anchor switched from the SDR to the euro on 1 January, 2005. The current lats fluctuation margin is ±1% against the euro. | ||
| The Maltese lira entered the ERM II on May 2, 2005, and floats in a ±15% range against the euro (1 eur = 0.429300 LM). | ||
| 28 November, 2005 | The koruna now floats in a ±15% range (1 eur = 38.4550 koruna) against the euro. |
In May 2006 Poland finally set its target date for euro introduction on January 1, 2011
The first referendum held in Sweden regarding the adoption of the Euro was on November 13 1994. The adoption of the euro is integral part of its Treaty of Accession to the European Union. The vote was 53% in favour for joining the EU, and thus the Eurozone.
The consultative national referendum on September 14, 2003, resulted in a rejection of adopting the euro, with the following figures: Yes 42.0%, No 55.9%. Consequently, the decision has been postponed, as all political parties have pledged to uphold the results for the time being. Prime Minister Göran Persson said in September 2004 that the Swedish membership will definitely not happen before the 2010 General Election. [http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/ekonomi/story/0,2789,531733,00.html
The decision of Sweden not to adopt the euro in the near future is generally accepted within the European Union. Sweden joined the EU in 1995, and as such did not have the opportunity to gain an opt-out in the Maastricht treaty, which was already concluded in 1992. In 1995, however, the euro didn't exist, neither physically (2002) nor legally (1999), and maybe because of this the European Commission has not taken any legal action about fullfilling this Swedish commitment so far.
It should be noted, however, that Sweden is technically also obliged to introduce the euro, which is not planned to be reconsidered until 2009 after a referendum in 2003 resulted in a clear "no". It has been warned however, that any move similar to that of Sweden in the new states will not be tolerated, as it has been with Sweden.
The British government under Prime Minister Tony Blair has committed itself to a triple-approval procedure before joining the Eurozone, involving approval by the Cabinet, Parliament, and the British electorate in a referendum.
Unlike other European countries, where the euro is seen mostly as an essential building block in a more politically integrated Europe, in the United Kingdom the possible benefits of Eurozone membership are seen mostly as principally economic, and an assessment of British membership based on five economic tests was published on June 9, 2003 by Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown.
Though maintaining the government's positive view on the euro, the report came out against membership because four out of the five tests were not passed.
Chancellor Brown stated * in June 2003 that the best exchange rate for the UK to join the single currency would be around 73 pence per euro (a value which the pair had never reached). This rate has not been formalised as an official condition of entry.
Opinion polls * in the UK show a consistent majority of the British public to be against joining the Eurozone. Some perceive loss of political and economic sovereignty; others are unconvinced of the case for change from their familiar currency. However, one of the main reasons for hostility is the perceived failure of the euro in Eurozone economies — the UK has enjoyed superior economic performance to major Eurozone economies throughout the euro era. The large future unfunded pension liabilities of continental Europe's greying populations (unlike in the UK where pension liabilities are generally well-funded, and the UK's population will not decline) are often cited as a major economic argument against joining. A referendum in the near future has been ruled out.
If Britain were to join the Eurozone, it is unclear what would happen in its overseas territories which use the British pound sterling. It is conceivable that the euro would only become the official currency in those regions which technically use the currency identified by the code GBP (i.e., Great Britain and Northern Ireland, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands), while the regions using their own currencies with a fixed exchange rate of 1 : 1 to the pound sterling might keep their currencies with a fixed rate to the euro. Those regions would be the Falkland Islands (Falkland Islands pound - FKP), the Isle of Man (Isle of Man pound), Jersey (Jersey pound), Guernsey (Guernsey pound - GGP), and Saint Helena (Saint Helenian pound - SHP). France faced a similar situation on joining solved by areas which used the French franc directly (e.g., French Guiana) switching to the euro, and regions which used locally issued francs, pegged to the French franc, maintaining local currencies but switching their pegs to the euro (e.g., the CFP franc). Note that Gibraltar (Gibraltar pound - GIP) is also within the EU, and that as it has a separate pegged currency, it would be subject to a separate referendum on the euro. Also of interest is that Scotland and Northern Ireland, although part of the UK, do not have an official currency defined in law. Here, each bank prints its own paper money, of different design to both the Bank of England issue and each other, and this money is denominated in pounds sterling. It is unclear whether, following a euro changeover, these banks would change denominations of their own issued in euros, or cease issuing their own money. See British banknotes.
The dates these ten states are expected to enter the third stage of the EMU and adopt the euro vary: 1 January, 2007 for Slovenia; 1 January, 2008 for Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia and Malta; 2009 for Lithuania and Slovakia; 2010 for the Czech Republic, 2011 for Poland, and finally 2012 for Hungary. On May 16, 2006 the European Commission recommended Slovenia to become the only new member of the Eurozone.
Showing the ability to move towards full economic and monetary union is one requisite of "good membership". The ECB and European Commission produce reports every two years analysing the economic and other conditions of non-eurozone EU members, reporting on their suitability for joining the Eurozone. The first to include the 10 new members was published in October 2004 *. The German Bundesbank, a major and arguably the most important national bank in the ESCB, is criticising the bloc's rush to enlarge the single currency zone.
| Target date for euro adoption | January 1, 2007 | January 1, 2008 | January 1, 2008 | January 1, 2008 | January 1, 2008 | January 1, 2009 | January 1, 2009 |
| ERM II entry | June 28, 2004 | June 28, 2004 | May 2, 2005 | May 2, 2005 | May 2, 2005 | June 28, 2004 | November 28, 2005 |
| '''Co-ordinating institution | The Coordinating Committee for Technical Preparations, created in July 2004 | The National Changeover Committee, created on Jan 27, 2005 | The Steering Committee for the preparation and coordination of the euro changeover was established on July 18, 2005 | Two Committees appointed on June 13, 2005: a Steering Committee and a Euro Changeover Committee reporting to it | Joint coordination by the Minister of Finance and the Central Bank of Cyprus, created on December 29, 2004 | Commission for the Coordination of the Adoption of the euro in Lithuania, created on May 30, 2005 | Ministry of Finance |
| Approved National Changeover Plan | Masterplan approved in Jan, 2005 | First draft approved on Sept 1, 2005 * | First version approved by the government on Sept 27, 2005 | Approved on July 6, 2005 | |||
| Type of scenario | Big-Bang | Big-Bang | Big-Bang | Big-Bang | Big-Bang | Big-Bang | |
| Dual circulation period | 2 weeks | 2 weeks | 2 weeks | 1 month | 15 days | 16 days | |
| Exchange of national currency | Comm. banks until March 1, Central bank indefinitely | Comm. banks at least 6 months, Central bank indefinitely | Central bank: indefinitely | Central bank: banknotes for 10 years and coins for 2 years. | Commercial banks 60 days, Central bank indefinitely. | Comm. bank: banknotes until end 2009, coins until June 2009. Central bank: banknotes indefinitely, coins for 5 years | |
| Dual display of prices | from March 1, 2006 until June 30, 2007 | 6 months before and after €-day | October 2007-June 2008 | 60 calendar days before until 60 days after €-day | Compulsory: from one month after fixing of conversion rate till one year after euro adoption. Voluntary: for an additional 6 months | ||
| National mint | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| National side | Approved | Approved | Final stage | Approved | Competition launched | Approved | Approved |
| Nr of different coin designs | 8 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Need for banknotes and coins | 74 million banknotes, 235 million coins | 150-200 million coins | 87 million banknotes and 300 million coins | 118.3 million banknotes, 290 million coins | |||
| Law adaptations | Umbrella law | Umbrella law under consideration | Umbrella law and a second and a third group of laws under consideration | Draft law on the adoption of the euro is prepared | |||
| Communication strategy | Endorsed by Bank of Slovenia on May 19 and by government on June 2, 2005 | Endorsed by the National Changeover Committee on June 21, 2005 | In process | In process | Endorsed by the government on September 27, 2005 | ||
| Target date for euro adoption | January 1, 2010 | January 1, 2010 | January 1, 2011 | mid-2009 | Not before 2012 | ||
| ERM II entry | immediately after EU accession * | Not before 2010 | |||||
| '''Co-ordinating institution | Preparatory work is ongoing in the Ministry of Finance and Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary) | Inter-institutional working group MoF-NBP | |||||
| Approved National Changeover Plan | The Czech Republic’s Euro Accession Strategy was approved by the Government in October 2003 * | ||||||
| Type of scenario | Big-Bang with possible phase out features | ||||||
| Dual circulation period | 1 month | ||||||
| Exchange of national currency | |||||||
| Dual display of prices | |||||||
| National mint | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| National side | Competition under consideration | Not yet decided | Public survey | ||||
| Nr of different coin designs | |||||||
| Need for banknotes and coins | 230 million banknotes and 950 million coins | ||||||
| Law adaptations | |||||||
| Communication strategy |
Notes:
Source: European Commission report "Big-bang" refers to a scenario in which, on introduction of the euro, only the euro is legal currency and the former currency is invalid instantly. Preliminary date
Although Bulgaria is not a member state yet (member as of January 1 2007), the Bulgarian National Bank (BNB) and the Bulgarian government have agreed on the introduction of the euro in mid 2009, when the Bulgarian National Bank is expected to become part of the Eurozone and will receive the right to issue Bulgarian euro coins. The early accession to the Eurozone is due to the extremely tight monetary policy currently in use, which is the result of Bulgaria's agreement with the Monetary Board. Even at this point of time Bulgaria has fulfilled the great majority of Eurozone membership criteria.
Eurozona | Ardal Ewro | Eurozone | Zone euro | Limistéar an eoró | Eurozona | Euro-Zon | Eurózóna | Eurozone | Ûrozône | Eurostrefa | Zona Euro | Zona euro | Euroalue | Avro Alanı | 欧元区
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Eurozone".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world