Etymotic Research, Inc. is an Illinois, USA-based research, development and manufacturing company that designs and manufactures in-ear products. It is perhaps best known for being one of the earliest and foremost manufacturers of canalphones for consumer use (other manufacturers had only sold them to musicians, for monitoring use).
Etymotic Research's products are aimed towards scientists, hearing-impaired individuals, audiophiles, and musicians. In addition to their earbuds, ER also has earsets for cellular devices, hearing aids, and microphones.
All of Etymotic's canalphones operate under the closed-canal principle. Etymotic also produces a line of musicians' earplugs, also with the initials of ER. Designed to preserve musicians' hearing while still providing equal attenuation at all frequencies (or, a softer version of what the ear would usually hear), they come in dB levels of 9,15, and 25 dB.
The ER-6i Earphones are Etymotic Research's newer and cheapest model of canalphones, designed specially for the iPod and other low power mp3 players that require a lower impedance. It and its cousin, the ER-6 (with higher impedance and without a bass boost, used in the ER-6i to compensate for low power sources) are basically cheaper versions of the earlier ER-4 family; like the ER-4's, the ER-6's tout high fidelity and very detailed sound reproduction, although their armature drivers are reported to have lower quantities of bass than regular headphones.
Operating under the closed-canal principle (A canalphone uses specially-formulated sleeves to prevent environmental air from entering the ear canal), the ER-6i's specially-formulated sleeves blocks out environmental noises enabling music-listening at lower volumes, leave out no weird sound artifacts, and requires no external power, thus reducing the risks of hearing damage. Etymotic and other canalphone manufacturers market their IEMs against active noise-cancellation headphones by comparing their products against active noise-cancellation headphones, touting that their IEMs cancel out sound against all frequencies plus having a higher level of noise attenuation.
The ER-6 family has its share of critism; two key flaws are the thin, tangle-prone cord used in the Etymotics and the general use of the product, which may be unnerving to many purchasers (The Er-6i's small dimensions require its deep insertion into the ear canal, causing initial discomfort). Some "audio newbies" also complain that the ER-6i earbuds don't have any bass at all—it is likely the earbuds are inserted improperly, although as noted, the ER-6i's drivers cannot produce the same bass quantity or extension as some dynamic headphones. Another flaw of these headphones is the periodic maintenance required, higher than what may be expected for some purchasers. Earphone foam tips and filters must be replaced periodically due to the buildup of earwax, and the user may need to buy new filters from Etymotic Research. The silicone ear tips can be reused, and cleaned carefully with soapy water.
The ER4 comes in the P (portable, with a low impedance), S (stereo, with a higher impedance, though Etymotic sells a cable that switches impedance of ER-4P to ER-4S) and B (binaural, see introduction in headphones). Like the ER-6, the inherent disadvantages of canalphone designs apply to the ER-4. Although the ER-4 MicroPro family aged well, some audiophiles (like those on Head-Fi) believe that canalphones, while providing excellent detail, lack other musical attributes such as soundstage and bass presence, giving them a "cold, analytical" sound not to mention that audiophiles will be expecting Etymotic to deploy a fresher, more updated design with multiple drivers. While others argue that with proper insertion, bass quantity is sufficient and that canalphones do not sound as "cold and analytical" as some believe. However, since frequencies much below 30Hz is more often 'felt' with the body than 'heard' with the ear, headphones in general (and canalphones in particular) cannot reproduce the physical impact of bass as would be experienced with large subwoofers. Ultimately, the only way to be sure of ones's own preference is to try the canalphones for yourself. Since as with most discussions regarding sound quality, the arguments from each side tend to be very subjective, and those making the arguments usually have little understanding of audiology and psychoacoustics.
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Etymotic Research".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world