Energy efficiency in British housing has been attracting greater attention in recent years due to the UK commitment to the United Kingdom Climate Change Programme, and the Kyoto Protocol.
Domestic housing in the United Kingdom is currently one of the major obstacles to achieving the 20% overall cut in UK carbon emissions targeted by the Government for 2010.
Housing accounts for around 30% of all the UK's carbon dioxide emissions (up from 26.42% in 1990 By 2010 they are expected to have risen 18.5% above 1990 levels Select Committee on Environmental Audit noted that emissions from housing could constitute over 55% of the UK's target for carbon emissions in 2050 [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmenvaud/135/13507.htm#a23" target="_blank" >*.
In 2004 housing accounted for 30.23% of all energy use in the UK (up from 27.70% in 1990) DTI.
At the same time as insulation standards have been increasing, so has the standard of home heating. In 1970, only 31% of homes had central heating. By 2003 it had been installed in 92% of British homes (DTI), leading in turn to a rise in the average temperature within them (from 12.1°C to 18.20°C) (DTI). Even in homes with central heating, average temperatures rose 4.55°C during this period.
At the same time, the increase in the number of households, increasing numbers of domestic electrical appliances, an increase in the number of light fittings, reduction in the average number of occupants per household, plus other factors, had lead to an increase in total national domestic energy consumption from around 25% in 1970 to about 30% in 2001, and remained on an upward trend (BRE figures).
The figures for energy consumed by end use for 2003 were:
The energy policy of the United Kingdom through the 2003 White Paper articulated directions for more energy efficient building construction. Hence, the year 2006 saw a significant tightening of energy efficiency requirements within the Building Regulations (for earlier regulations, see separate section below).
With the long term aim of cutting overall emissions by 60% by 2050, and by 80% by 2100, the intention of the 2006 changes was to cut energy use in new housing by 20% compared to a similar building constructed to the 2002 standards. The changes were the first to the regulations brought about by the desire to reduce emissions, though some have raised doubts about whether they will actually achieve the 20% cut (see criticisms section).
In the 2006 regulations, the u-value was replaced as the primary measure of energy efficiency by the Dwelling Carbon Dioxide Emission Rate (DER), an estimate of carbon dioxide emissions per m² of floor area. This is calculated using the Government's Standard Assessment Procedure for Energy Rating of Dwellings (SAP 2005).
In addition to the levels of insulation provide by the structure of the building, the DER also takes into account the airtightness of the building, the efficiency of space and water heating, the efficiency of lighting, and any savings from solar power or other energy generation technologies employed, and other factors. For the first time, it also became compulsory to upgrade the energy efficiency in existing houses when extensions or certain other works are carried out.
Despite the tightening of the requirements and previous loopholes, the regulations have been criticised by some for not going further. Criticisms include the exclusion of domestic appliances from the calculations, not requiring provision to be made for retrofitting of solar or other technologies, lack of remedial requirements if airtightness tests are failed, and for not requiring greater insulation standards.
A more fundamental criticism by some is that even if the expected 20% cut is achieved, this falls far short of achieving the long term goal of a 60% cut in carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. The London Sustainable Development Commission, for example, has calculated that to meet the 60% target, all new developments would have to be constructed to be carbon-neutral with immediate effect (using zero energy building techniques), in addition to cutting energy used in existing housing by 40%.
From June 2007, all homes (and other buildings) in the UK must undergo Energy Performance Certification before they are sold or let *, in order to meet the requirements of the European Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (Directive 2002/91/EC). This will provide the owner or landlord with an 'energy label' so that they can demonstrate the energy efficiency of the property, and is also to be included in the new Home Information Packs.
It is hoped that energy labelling will raise awareness of energy efficiency, and encourage upgrading to make properties more marketable.
For new building, SAP 2005 calculations are to form the basis for the certification, while the National Homes Energy Rating scheme (NHER) will be used to assess existing properties.
A similar scheme, the Scottish Community and Household Renewables Initiative operates in Scotland, which also offers grants towards the cost of air source heat pumps.
In May 2006, a report commissioned by British Gas was published, which showed for the first time annual carbon emissions for housing by local authority area. Properties in Uttlesford produced the highest carbon emissions (8,092 kg of carbon dioxide per dwelling). This was 250% higher than than Camden (averaging 3,255 kg), which had the lowest. Among the 23 towns included, Reading had the highest emissions (6,189 kg), with Hull the lowest (4,395 kg). *
The Beddington Zero Energy Development (BedZED), an environmentally-friendly housing scheme of 82 dwellings near Beddington, included zero energy usage as one of its key features. The project was completed in 2002 and is the UK's largest eco-development. The only energy used is generated from renewables on site. Due to their superinsulation, the properties use 73% less energy for space heating compared to those built to the 2002 Building Regulations, while the reduction for water heating is 44%.
The u-value limits introduced in 1979 were:
1985 saw the first tightening of these limits, to:
These limits were reduced again in 1990:
In the 1995 Building Regulations, insulation standards were cut to the following U-values:
The 2002 regulations reduced the U-values, and made additional elements of the building fabric subject to control. Although there was in practice considerable flexibility and the ability to 'trade off' reductions in one are for increases in another, the 'target' limits became:
Similar limits were introduced into Scotland in 2002, though with a lower limit of 0.3 or 0.27 for walls, and some other variations. It was estimated at the time that these measures should cut the heating requirement by 25% (DTI: Energy efficiency in the UK 1990-2000, pdf file).
While the u-value ceased being the sole consideration in 2006, u-value limits similar to those in the 2002 regulations still apply, but are no longer sufficient by themselves. The DER, calculated through the Government's Standard Assessment Procedure for Energy Rating of Dwellings (SAP rating), 2005 edition, became the only acceptable calculation method. Calculations using previous versions of SAP had been an optional way of demonstrating compliance since 1991(?).
Housing in the United Kingdom | Building | Energy conservation | Energy in the United Kingdom
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Energy efficiency in British housing".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world