A Dot-com company, or simply a dot-com, was any company that promoted itself as an Internet business during the Dot-com boom. The name stems from the popular top-level domain, ".com", in turn derived from the word "commercial". During the subsequent stock market crash, the many failed and failing companies became known as dot-bombs.
Many were startups formed to take advantage of the surplus of venture capital funding. Many were launched with very thin business plans, sometimes with nothing more than an idea and a catchy name. The stated goal was often to "get big fast" i.e. capture a majority share of whatever market was being entered. The exit strategy usually included an IPO and a large payoff for the founders.
Others were existing companies that re-style themselves as Internet companies, many of them legally changing their names to incorporate a .com suffix.
After the crash, many of the surviving firms dropped the .com from their names*.
Definitions of Dot Bombs:
To develop a clearer focus of what an actual “dot bomb” consists of, we provide a few examples of definitions for the term.
“A dot-com company that went out of business or one that is failing.”1 - http://computing-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/dot+bomb
“An internet based company that fails before maturity in the e-commerce market.”2 - Keith Wilson and Michael Olivella
“A failed Internet business.”3 - MSN Encarta, http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_701705660/dot_bomb.html
Reasons why Dot Bombs Fail:
We have identified some key reasons for failure among the dot bombs that should be looked at when deciding to start a dot com company. By looking at the sources of failure, people can learn to avoid those same situations themselves.
A large part of the failures among many of the dot bombs is the inability to manage supply chains. Supply chain management is very important because delivering a product on time satisfies people. They may not remember the product arriving on time, but they will definitely remember how tardy the company was. When all a customer has to do is click on the next Google link down to come across the competitor, customer service becomes essential.4
http://www.istart.co.nz/index/HM20/PC0/PVC197/EX232/AR2425
Another basis for failure that we came across ourselves is a combination of two items that all internet start-up companies were battling against.
First, the usefulness of each and every dot com or dot bomb has to be considered. If a company is offering to ship a product in under a week which any consumer can purchase at the corner store five minutes away is not useful. This company would be adding shipping costs and time. Another small point to make is that time is money and therefore, this type of start-up seems useless. Many of the pharmaceutical internet start-ups fit this description in our humble opinion.
Secondly, the sheer number of dot com companies all emerging around the turn of the century is a hurdle of its own. The simple law of supply and demand solves this mystery. If there are enough internet start-up companies to satisfy a market larger than exists, the market won’t be able to satisfy the supply. Some companies will inevitably disappear. This is what happened to many companies and should not have come as a huge surprise to so many people.
Another aspect of failure lies within how the companies are set up. Some dot bombs tried to make the website perfect, the technology work perfectly, the ideas were good, but they forgot about business fundamentals. Without a solid understanding of business and how to run one, it becomes impossible to make a company successful on the internet, especially considering the fact that the internet is not a traditional place of business. The internet we know today didn’t even exist 20 years ago.5
http://www.oreilly.com/news/deathofdotcom_0601.html
The internet is a massive feeding trough for all companies and competition will always be intense. If leaders of new start-up companies take these ideas into account while planning online business, they will have a greater chance of becoming successful “Dot Coms” instead of unfortunate “Dot Bombs”.6
http://www.digitalwebcast.com/2001/02_feb/editorials/whydotcomsfail.htm
1. thefreedictionary.com. “http://computing-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/dot+bomb”. Retrieved June 26, 2006.
2. Wilson & Olivella, 2006
3. MSN Encarta. “http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_701705660/dot_bomb.html”. Retrieved June 26, 2006.
4. istart.co.nz. “http://www.istart.co.nz/index/HM20/PC0/PVC197/EX232/AR2425”. Retrieved June 26, 2006.
5. oreilly.com. “http://www.oreilly.com/news/deathofdotcom_0601.html”. Retrieved June 26, 2006.
6. digitalwebcast.com. “http://www.digitalwebcast.com/2001/02_feb/editorials/whydotcomsfail.htm”. Retrieved June 26, 2006.
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Dot-com company".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world