Davidic line, (also House of David or Davidic dynasty), known in Hebrew as Malchut Beit David ("Monarchy the House * David") refers to the tracing of royal lineage by kings and major leaders in Jewish history to the Biblical King David in Judaism.
Since the monarchy was vouchsafed to David by God in the Book of Samuel:
As well as in the Book of Chronicles:
Thus all subsequent monarchs in both the ancient first united Kingdom of Israel and the later Kingdom of Judah needed to show their direct descent from King David to validate their claim to the throne in order to rule over the Israelite and Jewish people in perpetuity.
In cases where this rule was broken, the verdict of history has not been kind according to classical understandings within traditional Judaism. Two important examples are:
With the cessation of the Jewish monarchy following the destructions of both the Temple of Solomon and the Second Temple, the line of the monarchy was always carefully preserved and guarded even though no kings such as David and his immediate descendants were alive. It was from that supposed Davidic line though that many great rabbis and "princes" of the people were claimed descent. Thus men such as the editor of the Mishnah, Rabbi Judah haNasi and his heirs were considered to be from the Davidic line, hence also the title "Nasi" meaning prince. Many of the heads of the Jewish communities in Babylon, the Reish Galuta were also described as being of the Davidic line.
Subsequently, great rabbis such as Rashi, who was a descendant of Judah haNasi, and the Maharal of Prague, were all considered to be from the Davidic line by Orthodox Judaism.
The future Jewish Messiah is expected to be from the "Davidic line" (The Tree of Life), see Jewish eschatology. Many prayers in the Jewish prayer book, the Siddur make fervent mention for the restoration of King David's monarchy, and the long-awaited Messiah who is referred to as Mashiach ben David, "Messiah son of * David".
Additionally, in many ancient cultures, including Israelites, genealogy was not considered the same as paternity. For instance, under the Mosaic law, if a man died without offspring and he had a brother, the brother was legally required to marry the widow and the dead brother was considered the father of their first child (Genesis 38). Under such broader views, Jesus could be the legal son of Joseph, and therefore be from the line of David, without being Joseph's biological son and without being adopted.
Also, the New Testament lists two different genealogies for Jesus, one at the beginning of Matthew and one in Luke 3:23-38. Matthew says "A was the father of B, B was the father of C", etc. Luke, however, uses a word that can mean either "biological son" or "descendant", in the form "C was the son of B, who was the son of A". Matthew shows a lineage from David, father of Solomon and Luke shows a lineage through Nathan, a son of David. A common explanation offered by Christian biblical scholars is that Matthew is stating Joseph's line and Luke is stating Mary's line. Under this interpretation, Jesus would be a biological descendant of David through his mother.
The issue of Bahá'u'lláh being the heir of David is of substantial importance to a small group known as the Bahá'ís Under the Provisions of the Covenant (BUPC). This group holds that the Old Testament paints a picture of two different Messiah's from the House of David each coming on a separate occasion; not the same Messiah appearing twice. They believe Jesus was the "first" Messiah and Bahá'u'lláh is the "second" and the heir of David.
For the Bahá'í Faith this question is not of general interest, and most read the above reference to the throne of David as symbolic rather than literal. The Central Figures, the Guardian, and the Universal House of Justice, have taken no position on the matter and, therefore, members are free to hold their own personal interpretations. However, the Bahá'í writings use the term "Messiah" exclusively in reference to Jesus.
The question of whether or not Bahá'u'lláh is the actual heir of David is difficult to resolve. A few historians have traced Bahá'u'lláh's descent back to Bostanai. References and documentation in English is scarce and there have been several claimants to the title over the centuries each with their own evidence of ancestry which adds to the difficulty. *
This genealogy, attributed to Grover Gonzales and available on an online Bahá'í reference library, notes significant gaps in the line of descent from Bostanai to Bahá'u'lláh. A more complete genealogy and charts compiled by David Hughes, which discusses the various claims of Davidic ancestry, can be compared to the Gonzales chart and the genealogy prepared by the BUPC, and the various differences noted.
One distinction between the Hughes genealogy and the BUPC's is that Hughes notes several generations where Bahá'u'lláh's line of descent was through younger sons.
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Davidic line".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world