The copyright law of Switzerland is based on the concept of "author's rights" (Urheberrecht in German, droit d'auteur in French), similarly to the French copyright law, instead of the concept of Copyright used in common law jurisdictions. The current copyright law of Switzerland is the Swiss Federal Copyright Act of 1992, which dates from October 9 1992 and has only seen minor revisions since then. As of March 2006, a major revision is being undertaken to implement the WIPO Copyright Treaty in the act.
Copyright in Swiss law last for 70 years after the death of the author (50 years after the death of the author for computer programs). All "works" in the sense of the law, i.e. "creations of the mind, literary or artistic, that have an individual character"Art. 2 par. 1 URG. are automatically protected by copyright, irrespective of whether copyright is asserted or not, but provided that it passes the threshold of originality necessary to constitute a protected work. In the case of photographs, the level of protection has been defined in two decisions of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court, the “Bob Marley” case (2003) and the “Meili” case (2004).See the list of authorities supra for citations.
Certain documents are specifically excluded from benefiting from copyright protection in Switzerland; they are mostly official documents, such as laws or ordinances, or pieces of currency, but patents or patent applications are also excluded from protection. These exceptions are covered in detail below.
Copyright protection for most protected works expires 70 years after the death of the author under Swiss law, the only exception being computer programs, which are protected for 50 years after the death of the author.Art. 29 URG/LDA par. 2 The protection also expires if the death must be assumed.Ibid, par. 3. The date of death of the last author is relevant in cases of coauthorship, unless the contributions are separable.Art. 30 URG/LDA. The 50 or 70 years of protection are counted starting at the end of the year when the author (or last author) died.Art. 32 URG/LDA. Works of unknown authors enter the public domain 70 years after the date of publication (even if the author is identified once the protection has ended).Art. 31 URG/LDA.
Swiss law also protects performer's rights; the duration of protection is 50 years, starting from the end of the year when the work was performed.Art. 39 URG/LDA.
Before the last major revision of the Swiss Copyright Act, in 1992, the duration of copyright was 50 years after the death of the author for all works. Works that were already in the public domain as of 1 July 1993, when the new law started being applied, do not benefit from renewed protection; therefore, all works made by authors deceased in 1942 or before are in the public domain in Switzerland.Bloch.
The following are ineligible for copyright by law:Art. 5 URG/LDA.
It follows that photographs taken from or of these documents are also in the public domain. However:
Only "works" in the sense of the law, i.e. "creations of the mind, literary or artistic, that have an individual character",Art. 2 par. 1 URG. are protected by copyright. What exactly individuality (also referred to as originality) means for photographs has long been a focus of dispute.
In its 2003 Marley decision, the Federal Supreme Court found that the picture at issue (shot by a spectator with a handheld camera) had the required individual character by virtue of the aesthetic appeal of the picture, combined with the orientation of the picture's components and the distribution and light and shadow. It also found that it was a "creation of the mind" by being shot at a specific time during the singer's movement on the stage.Marley, p. 175. Accordingly, the Court held that the picture was protected by copyright.
In its 2004 Meili decision, the Court found that the picture at issue, shot by a reporter to document Christoph Meili with the files he had taken from his employer, lacked individual character. It found that the scope of conceptional and technical possibilities was not exploited, and that the photograph did not distinguish itself in any way from what was common use.Meili, p. 720. For lack of an individual expression of thought,Ibid, p. 717. therefore, the Court held that the image was not copyrighted.
Legal scholarship has attempted to summarise the Federal Supreme Court's jurisprudence on the threshold of originality as follows:The following is adapted from Wild, p. 92 et seq.
In March 2006, the Swiss Federal Council released a draft project of a revision of the Swiss Copyright Law. One of the main goals of this revision is the implementation of the WIPO Copyright Treaty. See the Legal information page at the Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property.
Photojournalism | Copyright law by country | Copyright case law | Swiss law
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Copyright law of Switzerland".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world