The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) is an international treaty administered by the World Trade Organization (WTO) which sets down minimum standards for most forms of intellectual property (IP) regulation within all member countries of the World Trade Organization. It was negotiated at the end of the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) treaty in 1994.
Specifically, TRIPs deals with copyright and related rights, such as rights of performers, producers of sound recordings and broadcasting organisations; geographical indications, including appellations of origin; industrial designs; integrated circuit layout-designs; patents, including the protection of new varieties of plants; trademarks; trade dress; and undisclosed or confidential information, including trade secrets and test data. TRIPs also specifies enforcement procedures, remedies, and dispute resolution procedures.
The obligations under TRIPs apply equally to all member states, however developing countries are allowed a longer period in which to implement the applicable changes to their national laws.
Although subsequent developments have expanded the original requirements of TRIPs, the agreement itself introduced intellectual property law into the international trading system for the first time, and remains the most comprehensive international agreement on intellectual property to date. TRIPS has been criticised by the alter-globalization movement, concerning for example its consequences for the AIDS pandemic in Africa.
TRIPs was added to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) treaty at the end of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations in 1994. Its inclusion was the culmination of a program of intense lobbying by the United States, supported by the European Union, Japan and other developed nations. Campaigns of unilateral economic encouragement under the Generalized System of Preferences and coercion under Section 301 of the Trade Act were also influential. In turn, the United States strategy of linking trade policy to intellectual property standards can be traced back to the entrepreneurship of senior management at Pfizer in the early 1980s, who mobilised corporations in the United States and made maximising intellectual property privileges the number one priority of trade policy in the United States (Braithwaite and Drahos, 2000, Chapter 7).
After the Uruguay round, the GATT became the basis for the establishment of the World Trade Organization. As ratification of TRIPs is a compulsory requirement of World Trade Organization membership, any country seeking to obtain easy access to the numerous international markets opened by the World Trade Organization must enact the strict intellectual property laws mandated by TRIPs.
Furthermore, unlike other international agreements on intellectual property, TRIPs has a powerful enforcement mechanism. States which do not adopt TRIPs-compliant intellectual property systems can be disciplined through the WTO's dispute settlement mechanism, which is capable of authorising trade sanctions against non-compliant states.
TRIPs requires member states to provide strong protection for intellectual property rights. For example, under TRIPs:
Many of the TRIPs provisions on copyright were imported from the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works and many of its trademark and patent provisions were imported from the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property.
Since TRIPs came into force it has received a growing level of criticism from developing countries, academics, and Non-governmental organizations. Some of this criticism is against the WTO as a whole, but many advocates of trade liberalisation also regard TRIPS as bad policy. TRIPS' wealth redistribution effects (moving money from people in developing countries to copyright and patent owners in developed countries) and its imposition of artificial scarcity on the citizens of countries that would otherwise have had weaker intellectual property laws, are a common basis for such criticisms.
The most visible conflict has been over AIDS drugs in Africa. Despite the role which patents have played in maintaining higher drug costs for public health programs across Africa, this controversy has not led to a revision of TRIPs. Instead, an interpretive statement, the Doha Declaration, was issued in November 2001, which indicated that TRIPs should not prevent states from dealing with public health crises. After that point, PhRMA, the United States and, to a lesser extent, other developed nations, began working to minimise the effect of the declaration. TRIPs provides for "compulsory licencing", which allows a national government to issue a licence for the production of drugs without the consent of the patent owner as long as those drugs are primarily for the domestic market. A 2003 agreement loosened the domestic market requirement, and allows developing countries to export to other countries where there is a national health problem as long as drugs exported are not part of a commercial or industrial policy *. Drugs exported under such a regime may be packaged or colored differently to prevent them from prejudicing markets in the developed world.
Indeed, in 2004, the main way that Intellectual Property rules hinders access to medicines comes not so much from the TRIPs Agreement itself but rather from regional trade agreements with more stringent IP requirements, or from the way the TRIPs Agreement has been implemented at the national level.
Another recent controversy has been over the TRIPs Article 27 requirements for patentability "in all fields of technology", and whether or not this necessitates the granting of software and business method patents.
Although the requirements of TRIPs are, from a policy perspective, extremely stringent, the lobby groups working to expand various IP laws ("intellectual property laws") have certainly found "limitations" in it.
These have formed the basis for various bilateral and multilateral initatives since 1994:
According to WTO 10th Anniversary, Highlights of the first decade, Annual Report 2005 page 142 *, in the first ten years, 25 complaints have been lodged leading to the panel reports and appellate body reports on TRIPS listed below.
The WTO website has a gateway to all TRIPS disputes (including those that did not lead to panel reports) here *.
Споразумение относно свързаните с търговията аспекти на правата на интелектуалната собственост (ТРИПС) | Übereinkommen über handelsbezogene Aspekte der Rechte des geistigen Eigentums | Συμφωνία για τα δικαιώματα πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας στον τομέα του εμπορίου | Acuerdo sobre los Aspectos de los Derechos de Propiedad Intelectual relacionados con el Comercio | Aspects des droits de propriété intellectuelle qui touchent au commerce | TRIPs | Acordo TRIPs | TRIPS
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the
"Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights".
Home Page • arts • business • computers • games • health • hospitals • home • kids & teens • news • physicians • recreation• reference • regional • science • shopping • society • sports • world