article

A 527 group is a type of tax-exempt organization, named after a section of the United States tax code, that is created primarily to influence the nomination, election, appointment or defeat of candidates for public office. Although candidate committees and political action committees are also created under Section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code, the term is generally used to refer to political organizations which are not regulated by the Federal Election Commission or a state elections commission and not subject to the same contribution limits as PACs.

Current legislation


Congress is currently considering new limits on 527s (comment on bill, analysis of bill.)

Because 527 organizations do not make expenditures to directly advocate the election or defeat of any candidate for federal elective office they avoid regulation by the Federal Elections Commission. The line between issue advocacy and candidate advocacy is the source of heated debate and litigation.

Many 527s are run by special interest groups and used to raise unlimited amounts of money to spend on issue advocacy and voter mobilization.

Examples of 527s include Americans for Dr. Rice, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, Texans for Truth, The Media Fund, America Coming Together, the Moveon.org Voter Fund, the Progress for America Voter Fund, and the November Fund.

During April of 2004, the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) held hearings to determine whether or not 527s should be regulated under campaign finance rules; see campaign finance reform for additional details. In May, they decided to delay any ruling for an additional 90 days, almost certainly pushing it to past the 2004 presidential election.

2004 election controversy


Under federal election law, coordination between an election campaign and a 527 group is not allowed. The heavy spending of key 527 groups to attack presidential candidates brought complaints to the Federal Elections Commission of illegal coordination between the groups and rival political campaigns. These formal complaints included:

Several people who are involved with both organizations have removed themselves to avoid the appearance of conflict. Attorney Benjamin Ginsberg pointed out that it was not uncommon or illegal for lawyers to represent campaigns or political parties while also representing 527 groups. For example, Washington attorney Joe Sandler simultaneously represents the Democratic National Committee and a 527 group airing anti-Bush ads, the MoveOn.org Voter Fund.

Top 20 527 groups, 2004 election cycle


Some of these listings identify a parent organization that has created a 527 group but that also engages in many nonpolitical activities. Democratic/liberal leaning groups are highlighted in blue, Republican/conservative leaning groups are highlighted in red.

Rank Name 2004 Fundraising 2004 Expenditures
1 America Coming Together $78,652,163 $76,270,931
2 Joint Victory Campaign 2004* $71,809,666 $72,347,983
3 Media Fund $59,394,183 $54,429,053
4 Progress for America $44,929,174 $35,437,204
5 Service Employees International Union $42,609,668 $43,979,395
6 American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees $24,998,802 $25,465,222
7 Swift Boat Veterans for Truth $16,818,390 $22,424,420
8 Club for Growth $13,383,974 $16,575,435
9 MoveOn.org $12,517,365 $21,205,288
10 New Democratic Network $12,221,608 $12,194,451
11 Citizens for a Strong Senate $12,848,730 $10,143,121
12 Sierra Club $8,727,127 $6,147,176
13 EMILY's List $7,684,046 $7,938,328
14 Voices for Working Families $7,466,056 $6,809,102
15 College Republican National Committee $6,372,843 $8,207,393
16 AFL-CIO $6,322,226 $6,380,028
17 League of Conservation Voters $6,049,500 $4,947,072
18 Club for Growth $4,115,037 $3,927,530
19 Democratic Victory $3,824,969 $2,603,654
20 Laborers Union $3,294,410 $3,274,785
As of January 11, 2005. Source: *
*Joint Victory Campaign 2004 is a joint fund-raising committee run by America Coming Together and the Media Fund. Money raised by JVC is divided between these two beneficiaries. Combining receipts for these three groups would result in double-counting.

Top 20 527 groups, 2006 election cycle


Rank Name Current Fundraising Current Expenditures
1 Service Employees International Union $12,074,296 $15,079,470
2 American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees $6,968,353 $6,174,618
3 Progress for America $4,675,000 $8,162,701
4 America Votes $4,604,988 $2,023,266
5 America Coming Together $4,494,107 $6,987,907
6 Club for Growth $3,508,841 $3,486,420
7 EMILY's List $3,352,254 $3,143,569
8 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers $1,959,821 $2,168,669
9 College Republican National Committee $1,909,389 $3,855,647
10 National Federation of Republican Women $1,584,092 $2,694,795
11 Laborers Union $1,536,975 $1,499,410
12 League of Conservation Voters $1,290,000 $443,607
13 GOPAC $1,013,209 $2,688,954
14 Senate Accountability Project $990,526 $987,173
11 Sheet Metal Workers Union $888,263 $935,827
12 Media Fund $810,000 $1,925,627
13 Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund $793,805 $855,184
14 Grassroots Democrats $740,040 $1,189,984
15 Illinois Hospital & Health Systems Association $675,189 $564,500
16 AFL-CIO $584,405 $689,848
17 New Democrat Network $516,994 $226,356
19 Voices for Working Families $511,281 $734,014
20 Operating Engineers Union $500,000 $127,500
As of February 7, 2006. Source: *

See also


External links


Taxation in the United States | Political advocacy groups in the United States | 527 groups | Tax Acts of the United States

527er-Gruppe

 

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the "527 group".

Home Pageartsbusinesscomputersgameshealthhospitalshomekids & teensnewsphysiciansrecreationreferenceregionalscienceshoppingsocietysportsworld